BREAKING: Target Test Prep releases Brand New 2026 On Demand GMAT prep course

Redeem

Target Test Prep · GMAT

Choose how you want to prepare

Learn live with an expert or move at your own pace. Every option includes the complete TTP study system.

★★★★★5.0559 reviews
GMATLiveTeach Starts Oct 17
Chris Peckover, Target Test Prep GMAT expert
LIVE ONLINE CLASSES

Get Ready for GMAT Test Day Faster with Live Online Classes

with Chris Peckover, 100th-Percentile GMAT Scorer

Oct 17 · Chris Peckover
Sat · 11:00 AM to 2:00 PM ET
Oct 20 · Chris Peckover
Tue, Thu · 8:00 to 10:00 PM ET
Oct 25 · Josh Braslow
Sun · 1:00 to 4:00 PM ET
Included
40 hours of live online classes + 6 months of TTP OnDemand
  • Attend the first class for free
  • Every class is recorded, so you never fall behind
View classes & enroll
Limited seats availableTarget Test Prep
EALiveTeachOnDemand 5 seats left Start anytime
EXECUTIVE ASSESSMENT

Target Test Prep EA OnDemand

Self-paced EA prep. Study on your schedule.

Logan Thompson
EXECUTIVE ASSESSMENT

Sep 6 to Dec 6, 2026

with Logan Thompson

165+ EA score guarantee
$05-day trial no automatic billing
Schedule
Sun · 9:30 AM to 12:30 PM ET
Included
40 hours of live online classes plus six months of access to the complete TTP EA OnDemand course.
  • 165+ EA Score Guarantee
  • 4,100+ Quant, Verbal, and Integrated Reasoning practice questions
  • 400+ hours of in-depth video lessons
  • 3,000+ step-by-step video solutions
View EA class & enroll Start free 5-day trial
Limited cohort · enrollment openTrial includes full course accessTarget Test Prep
GMATOnDemand Start anytime
SELF-PACED MASTERCLASS

Target Test Prep GMAT OnDemand

Complete access from day one. Study on your schedule.

715+ score guarantee
$0to start then $127/mo
  • Personalized study plan and analytics
  • Thousands of lessons and practice questions

Compare the format, schedule, and included access before enrolling. Prices and seat counts shown reflect the supplied offer details.

combo

Expert replies
by yellowho » Fri Jan 21, 2011 12:51 am
In how many ways can 16 different gifts be divided among four children if there is
no restriction on the number of gifts that each child can receive? In other words, a
child can receive as few as zero gifts and as many as 16 gifts?
Join the discussion
Source: — Problem Solving |

by Rahul@gurome » Fri Jan 21, 2011 1:19 am
yellowho wrote:In how many ways can 16 different gifts be divided among four children if there is
no restriction on the number of gifts that each child can receive? In other words, a
child can receive as few as zero gifts and as many as 16 gifts?
This type of problems can be solved by the famous "stick-separator" method. Which I have discussed in detail in another post, https://www.beatthegmat.com/oranges-t70953.html#320828.

The problem in the above mentioned post is slightly different, but the concept I used is applicable here too. Go through it and let me know if any further assistance is needed.
Rahul Lakhani
Quant Expert
Gurome, Inc.
https://www.GuroMe.com
On MBA sabbatical (at ISB) for 2011-12 - will stay active as time permits
1-800-566-4043 (USA)
+91-99201 32411 (India)
Join the discussion

by yellowho » Fri Jan 21, 2011 9:55 pm
Actually I applied your method originally and still got it wrong. I must be doing something wrong. Can you please take a look:

1) Since you can have zero gifts. there are 16 bars and 3 seperators and 4 regions that will make up the 4 children
2) 19!/3!16!

Answer is OA is 4^16 which also makes sense since there are 4 places each of the 16 items can be placed. My real question is what am I doing wrong the seperator method??



[quote="Rahul@gurome"][quote="yellowho"]In how many ways can 16 different gifts be divided among four children if there is
no restriction on the number of gifts that each child can receive? In other words, a
child can receive as few as zero gifts and as many as 16 gifts?[/quote]

This type of problems can be solved by the famous "stick-separator" method. Which I have discussed in detail in another post, [url]https://www.beatthegmat.com/oranges-t70953.html#320828[/url].

The problem in the above mentioned post is slightly different, but the concept I used is applicable here too. Go through it and let me know if any further assistance is needed.[/quote]
Join the discussion

by jaxis » Fri Jan 21, 2011 11:37 pm
yellowho ,

In the question Rahul is talking about, ALL THE 16 GIFTS ARE CONSIDERED SAME.

where as your question deals with 16 DIFFERENT. GIFTS,

So just to clear your doubt:

16 different gifts => Ans 4^16,
16 identical gifts => ans 19!/3!16! .
Join the discussion

by gmat1011 » Sat Jan 22, 2011 1:29 am
Beautiful method - Rahul. Thanks. This is great.

In this specific case since the items are all "different"

I think it can be thought of as assigning the children to each distinct gift and not the other way around.

There are 16 different gifts sitting in a row. How many ways can the 4 children be "packed" into each of the gifts if there is no restriction on the number of gifts the children can get?

First gift: 4
Second gift: 4
Third gift: 4
.....
Sixteenth gift: 4

4 * 4 * 4 *.... => 4^16

Quick question for Rahul: In your stick method ---

If I put 16 different sticks (each standing for a gift) + 3 separators

Then why doesn't (19!)/3!*1! yield the same result... If the gifts are all different then its like dividing by 1! 16 times in the denominator, right? Just as you divide by 16! if the items are all identical. Why doesn't that work here?

Thanks again.
Join the discussion

by Rahul@gurome » Sat Jan 22, 2011 2:06 am
Thanks jaxis for pointing out the difference.
Here the gifts are different hence there is exist a much more intuitive and easy method as gmat1011 explained.
gmat1011 wrote:Quick question for Rahul: In your stick method ---

If I put 16 different sticks (each standing for a gift) + 3 separators

Then why doesn't (19!)/3!*1! yield the same result... If the gifts are all different then its like dividing by 1! 16 times in the denominator, right? Just as you divide by 16! if the items are all identical. Why doesn't that work here?
Let's analyze for a small number of gifts, say 3 and 2 children.
Say the 4 gifts are A, B, and C and the children are x and y.

Now according to simple application of "stick-separator" method, there are four possible combinations: (0, 3), (1, 2), (2, 1), and (3, 0).

But as the gifts are different, (1, 2) can have three possible sub-arrangements : (A, B + C), (B, A + C), and (C, A + B). Same goes for (2, 1). Hence a total of 8 different combinations.

Whereas if you try to modify the "stick-separator" method as you did, then the number is much more because it takes some false sub-arrangements into account. Such as it interprets (0, 3) as (0, A + B + C), (0, A + C + B), (0, B + A + C), (0, B + C + A), (0, C + A + B), and (0, C + B + A).

Hope this helps to clear the confusion.
Rahul Lakhani
Quant Expert
Gurome, Inc.
https://www.GuroMe.com
On MBA sabbatical (at ISB) for 2011-12 - will stay active as time permits
1-800-566-4043 (USA)
+91-99201 32411 (India)
Join the discussion

by DarkKnight » Sat Jan 22, 2011 1:32 pm
Rahul@gurome wrote:Thanks jaxis for pointing out the difference.
Here the gifts are different hence there is exist a much more intuitive and easy method as gmat1011 explained.
gmat1011 wrote:Quick question for Rahul: In your stick method ---

If I put 16 different sticks (each standing for a gift) + 3 separators

Then why doesn't (19!)/3!*1! yield the same result... If the gifts are all different then its like dividing by 1! 16 times in the denominator, right? Just as you divide by 16! if the items are all identical. Why doesn't that work here?
Let's analyze for a small number of gifts, say 3 and 2 children.
Say the 4 gifts are A, B, and C and the children are x and y.

Now according to simple application of "stick-separator" method, there are four possible combinations: (0, 3), (1, 2), (2, 1), and (3, 0).

But as the gifts are different, (1, 2) can have three possible sub-arrangements : (A, B + C), (B, A + C), and (C, A + B). Same goes for (2, 1). Hence a total of 8 different combinations.

Whereas if you try to modify the "stick-separator" method as you did, then the number is much more because it takes some false sub-arrangements into account. Such as it interprets (0, 3) as (0, A + B + C), (0, A + C + B), (0, B + A + C), (0, B + C + A), (0, C + A + B), and (0, C + B + A).

Hope this helps to clear the confusion.
Hi Rahul,

I can't visualize how we got to 4^16???? I don't understand what to make out of "I think it can be thought of as assigning the children to each distinct gift and not the other way around. " statement. Can you please explain how to get to 4^16? Thanks for your help.
Join the discussion

by Rahul@gurome » Sat Jan 22, 2011 1:36 pm
DarkKnight wrote:I can't visualize how we got to 4^16???? I don't understand what to make out of "I think it can be thought of as assigning the children to each distinct gift and not the other way around. " statement. Can you please explain how to get to 4^16? Thanks for your help.
We have 16 different gifts and we have to distribute them among 4 children.

Now, each of the 16 gifts can be given to any one of the 4 children.
Hence each gift can be distributed in 4 ways.
Thus, 16 gifts can be distributed by 4^16 ways.

Hope it helps.
Rahul Lakhani
Quant Expert
Gurome, Inc.
https://www.GuroMe.com
On MBA sabbatical (at ISB) for 2011-12 - will stay active as time permits
1-800-566-4043 (USA)
+91-99201 32411 (India)
Join the discussion

by DarkKnight » Sat Jan 22, 2011 1:49 pm
Rahul@gurome wrote:
DarkKnight wrote:I can't visualize how we got to 4^16???? I don't understand what to make out of "I think it can be thought of as assigning the children to each distinct gift and not the other way around. " statement. Can you please explain how to get to 4^16? Thanks for your help.
We have 16 different gifts and we have to distribute them among 4 children.

Now, each of the 16 gifts can be given to any one of the 4 children.
Hence each gift can be distributed in 4 ways.
Thus, 16 gifts can be distributed by 4^16 ways.

Hope it helps.
Understood. I was focusing on groupings but not on counting method. Thanks for clearing it up.
Join the discussion

by nikhilgmat31 » Wed Sep 09, 2015 10:57 pm
Since there is no limitation on number of Gift for each kid. This makes it confusing.

1 kid can have 13 gifts & other 3 hold 1 gift each.
OR
1 kid can have 12 gifts & second kid has 2 gift & other 2 kids hold 1 gift each.


We need Mitch's help to solve this question.
Join the discussion

by GMATGuruNY » Thu Sep 10, 2015 3:17 am
yellowho wrote:In how many ways can 16 different gifts be divided among four children if there is no restriction on the number of gifts that each child can receive? In other words, a child can receive as few as zero gifts and as many as 16 gifts?
Let the 4 children be A, B, C and D.
Each gift must be assigned to a child.
Number of options for the 1st gift = 4. (A, B, C or D)
Number of options for the 2nd gift = 4. (A, B, C or D)
Number of options for the 3rd gift = 4. (A, B, C or D)
Until...
Number of options for the 16th gift = 4. (A, B, C or D)
To combine these options, we multiply:
4*4*4*...*4*4*4 = [spoiler]4¹�[/spoiler].
Private tutor exclusively for the GMAT and GRE, with over 20 years of experience.
Followed here and elsewhere by over 1900 test-takers.
I have worked with students based in the US, Australia, Taiwan, China, Tajikistan, Kuwait, Saudi Arabia -- a long list of countries.
My students have been admitted to HBS, CBS, Tuck, Yale, Stern, Fuqua -- a long list of top programs.

As a tutor, I don't simply teach you how I would approach problems.
I unlock the best way for YOU to solve problems.

For more information, please email me (Mitch Hunt) at [email protected].
Student Review #1
Student Review #2
Student Review #3
Join the discussion

by gmatdriller » Thu Sep 10, 2015 5:02 am
What is the difference if the question had asked:

In how many ways can 4 children be assigned 16 different gifts...?
Assume a child can receive as few as 0 gifts and as many as 16.

Thanks
Join the discussion

by GMATGuruNY » Thu Sep 10, 2015 5:18 am
gmatdriller wrote:What is the difference if the question had asked:

In how many ways can 4 children be assigned 16 different gifts...?
Assume a child can receive as few as 0 gifts and as many as 16.

Thanks
Same problem.
Since it is possible for a child not to receive a gift, but each gift MUST be given to a child, we count from the perspective of the gifts:
Number of options for the 1st gift = 4. (Any of the 4 children.)
Number of options for the 2nd gift = 4. (Any of the 4 children.)
Number of options for the 3rd gift = 4. (Any of the 4 children.)
Until...
Number of options for the 16th gift = 4. (Any of the 4 children.)
To combine these options, we multiply:
4*4*4*...*4*4*4 = 4¹�.
Private tutor exclusively for the GMAT and GRE, with over 20 years of experience.
Followed here and elsewhere by over 1900 test-takers.
I have worked with students based in the US, Australia, Taiwan, China, Tajikistan, Kuwait, Saudi Arabia -- a long list of countries.
My students have been admitted to HBS, CBS, Tuck, Yale, Stern, Fuqua -- a long list of top programs.

As a tutor, I don't simply teach you how I would approach problems.
I unlock the best way for YOU to solve problems.

For more information, please email me (Mitch Hunt) at [email protected].
Student Review #1
Student Review #2
Student Review #3
Join the discussion

by Brent@GMATPrepNow » Thu Sep 10, 2015 6:34 am
yellowho wrote:In how many ways can 16 different gifts be divided among four children if there is no restriction on the number of gifts that each child can receive? In other words, a child can receive as few as zero gifts and as many as 16 gifts?
Take the task of distributing the 16 gifts and break it into stages.

Stage 1: Select which child gets the 1st gift
There are 4 children who can receive this gift, so we can complete stage 1 in 4 ways

Stage 2: Select which child gets the 2nd gift
There are 4 children who can receive this gift, so we can complete stage 2 in 4 ways

Stage 3: Select which child gets the 3rd gift
There are 4 children who can receive this gift, so we can complete stage 3 in 4 ways
.
.
.

Stage 16: Select which child gets the 16th gift
There are 4 children who can receive this gift, so we can complete stage 16 in 4 ways

By the Fundamental Counting Principle (FCP), we can complete all 16 stages (and thus distribute all 16 gifts) in (4)(4)(4)(4)(4)(4)(4)(4)(4)(4)(4)(4)(4)(4)(4)(4) ways ([spoiler]= 4¹� ways[/spoiler])

--------------------------

Note: the FCP can be used to solve the MAJORITY of counting questions on the GMAT. For more information about the FCP, watch our free video: https://www.gmatprepnow.com/module/gmat- ... /video/775

Then you can try solving the following questions:

EASY
- https://www.beatthegmat.com/what-should- ... 67256.html
- https://www.beatthegmat.com/counting-pro ... 44302.html
- https://www.beatthegmat.com/picking-a-5- ... 73110.html
- https://www.beatthegmat.com/permutation- ... 57412.html
- https://www.beatthegmat.com/simple-one-t270061.html
- https://www.beatthegmat.com/mouse-pellets-t274303.html


MEDIUM
- https://www.beatthegmat.com/combinatoric ... 73194.html
- https://www.beatthegmat.com/arabian-hors ... 50703.html
- https://www.beatthegmat.com/sub-sets-pro ... 73337.html
- https://www.beatthegmat.com/combinatoric ... 73180.html
- https://www.beatthegmat.com/digits-numbers-t270127.html
- https://www.beatthegmat.com/doubt-on-sep ... 71047.html
- https://www.beatthegmat.com/combinatoric ... 67079.html


DIFFICULT
- https://www.beatthegmat.com/wonderful-p- ... 71001.html
- https://www.beatthegmat.com/ps-counting-t273659.html
- https://www.beatthegmat.com/permutation- ... 73915.html
- https://www.beatthegmat.com/please-solve ... 71499.html
- https://www.beatthegmat.com/no-two-ladie ... 75661.html
- https://www.beatthegmat.com/laniera-s-co ... 15764.html

Cheers,
Brent
Brent Hanneson - Creator of GMATPrepNow.com
Image
Join the discussion

by gmatdriller » Thu Sep 10, 2015 11:46 am
GMATGuruNY wrote:
gmatdriller wrote:What is the difference if the question had asked:

In how many ways can 4 children be assigned 16 different gifts...?
Assume a child can receive as few as 0 gifts and as many as 16.

Thanks
Same problem.
Since it is possible for a child not to receive a gift, but each gift MUST be given to a child, we count from the perspective of the gifts:
Number of options for the 1st gift = 4. (Any of the 4 children.)
Number of options for the 2nd gift = 4. (Any of the 4 children.)
Number of options for the 3rd gift = 4. (Any of the 4 children.)
Until...
Number of options for the 16th gift = 4. (Any of the 4 children.)
To combine these options, we multiply:
4*4*4*...*4*4*4 = 4¹�.
Thanks GmatGuru for the response.
Because some children may not receive a gift, we cannot tell who it is.
Better to start from the perspective of the gifts.

But, In the event each child MUST receive at least a gift:

Would this be a reasonable question on the gmat?

Regards.
Join the discussion