-
BREAKING: Target Test Prep releases Brand New 2026 On Demand GMAT prep course
Redeem
The Distinction Between a 700 Score and a 760 Score
Recently, a Beat The GMAT member asked me to write an article addressing what it takes to score in the 99th percentile. I have some reservations about writing such an article, but I agreed to write it.
First, Im going to tell you why I have reservations about writing this article. A lot of people may read this article and think: Great! I can just do this and score in the 99th percentile! In order to have this conversation in the first place, however, we have to assume that the tester is already scoring at least 700, if not higher.
In other words, you cannot start with the information in this article (unless youre already at 700+!). In addition, I cant write an article that tells anyone, at any current level, how to get to 760. What I can do is write an article detailing the differences between a 700-level scorer and a 760-level scorer. What you can do, if you really want a 760, is first get yourself to a very solid 700-level using other articles and resources, not this one. (A very solid 700-level refers to someone who can consistently score 700 under full, official test conditions; it does not refer to someone who got 700 once after skipping the essays.)
I also have to discuss something about the designations Ive chosen here, 700 versus 760. The quant and verbal subscores combine to give us our three digit scores, and we can earn quite different subscores to get a 700 (or any score). This article will assume that the subscores are roughly similar (that is, the person does not have a big disparity between the two subscores). If someone does have such a disparity for example, a 70th percentile quant score and a 95th percentile verbal score then that person may score a 700, but will not have mastered everything listed under the 700-level section below for the quant portion. At the same time, that person will likely have mastered many, if not most, things listed under the 760-level section below for the verbal portion.
This is important enough that I will repeat it: This article will assume that the subscores are roughly similar (that is, the person does not have a big disparity between the two subscores).
Okay, now that we have that out of the way, lets start with:
The Obvious
Obviously, a 760-level scorer has mastered all of the common and the vast majority of the less common facts and information tested on the exam, as well as all of the common and less common question sub-types. The 760-level scorer has also mastered multiple techniques for tackling any one particular type of question. A 700-level scorer has mastered all of the common items and many of the less common items; this tester has also mastered at least two approaches for tackling any one particular type of question. Finally, 700+ testers have mastered the per-question and per-section timing (though a lower-700s tester may still have some minor per-question timing problems).
Beyond that, what are the significant differences between these two groups?
A 700-level scorer has mastered:
- How to recognize (see below) what to do for approximately 40+ percent of the questions that student sees on the official test
- Effective educated guessing for the 5 question type categories, as well as the major sub-types within each category
- How to minimize careless mistakes (this tester makes perhaps three to four careless mistakes per section)
- The stamina to perform consistently for 3.5 hours
Recognizing what to do
This skill how to recognize what to do is the single biggest difference seen in a higher-level scorer vs. lower-level scorers. Recognizing what to do means that, when you see a new question, you quickly (within about 20 to 30 seconds) make a connection to some problem youve done in the past; theres some similarity between the two problems and you recognize that similarity. As a result of that recognition, you now know what to do in order to solve this problem, because you can use the same (or a very similar) solution method that you used on the past, similar problem. You will also be aware of the common mistakes you might make or traps you might fall into on a question like this one. This ability to recognize gives you two advantages: you save time and youre more likely to answer the problem correctly. By contrast, if you dont recognize what to do, you have to figure out what to do from scratch (from the beginning); that slows you down and doesnt give you any advantage in terms of accuracy.
A 760-level scorer has mastered everything from the 700 list plus:
- How to recognize what to do, within 20 seconds or so, for 80+ percent of the questions that student sees on the official test; (that is, to determine very quickly and accurately the best approach for the problem)
- The ability to determine (again, quickly and accurately) when to let go of a problem (yes, even 760+ scorers have to make this call sometimes)
- An effective educated guessing process, specifically tailored to any particular sub-type of problem
- The ability to avoid making careless mistakes (this tester makes perhaps one careless mistake per section)
- The stamina to perform at peak levels for 3.5 hours
Wildcards
There are a couple of wildcards to take into account. First, serendipity plays a part in our performance on the GMAT, and the higher we go, the more of an impact serendipity can have. (Serendipity is just a prettier word for luck, basically.) A few additional questions in an area of strength vs. an area of weakness can make a 20 or 30 point difference in your score, especially at higher levels.
Second, the mastery described above relies heavily upon an ability to create and recall memories. Those with a greater capacity to remember and recall a large volume of information will find it easier to reach higher levels on the test. The mastery described above also relies heavily upon an ability to recognize patterns. Again, those with a greater capacity to study patterns and to recognize similar patterns in new information will also find it easier to reach higher levels on the test.
Take-aways
If youre going to score 700+ on the GMAT, you have to develop the ability to recognize what to do on at least some of the problems that you see on the official test (problems that, by definition, youll never have seen before). Then, you need to get better at this skill; the single biggest difference between a 760-level tester and a 700-level tester is the ability to recognize a larger percentage of the problems you see. (Remember, however, that even a 700-level tester does recognize a decent percentage of the problems. This is part of why I said, at the beginning of this article, that you cant start with this article. Most of the difference between a 760-level tester and a 700-level tester has to do with expert-level mastery of the same set of skills.)
How to do that? Start with this article that BTG published in the past:
Then, move on to these articles that demonstrate how to conduct the above analysis on specific problems:
- How To Analyze an SC Problem
- How To Analyze a CR Problem
- How to Analyze an RC Problem
- How To Analyze a PS Problem
- How To Analyze a DS Problem
Use these analyses to help give you an idea of what questions to ask and what to analyze when studying a problem. (I can spend 10 or 15 minutes studying a single problem, after Ive tried doing it.) Every time you finish a problem, ask yourself: When I see a problem of this same type in the future, or testing this same fact or concept, how will I recognize that its really the same thing as this problem, so that I can use the same technique to solve? Then test yourself to see whether you really are starting to recognize what to do (quickly!) when starting a new problem.
Recent Articles
- Best MBA for Real Estate: Top Schools, Career Paths & How to Choose
- The Best MBA Programs for Private Equity and Venture Capital
- Do You Need a Finalized Test Score Before You Hire an MBA Admissions Consultant?
- Best MBA for Entrepreneurship: Top Programs for Founders, Startups & Family Business Owners
- Am I Too Young for a Top MBA Program? Or Too Old?
Archive
- May 2026
- April 2026
- March 2026
- February 2026
- January 2026
- December 2025
- October 2025
- September 2025
- August 2025
- July 2025
- June 2025
- February 2025
- January 2025
- December 2024
- November 2024
- October 2024
- September 2024
- August 2024
- July 2024
- June 2024
- May 2024
- April 2024
- March 2024
- February 2024
- January 2024
- December 2023
- November 2023
- October 2023
- September 2023
- July 2023
- June 2023
- May 2023
- April 2023
- March 2023
- February 2023
- January 2023
- December 2022
- November 2022
- October 2022
- September 2022
- August 2022
- July 2022
- June 2022
- May 2022
- April 2022
- March 2022
- February 2022
- January 2022
- December 2021
- November 2021
- October 2021
- September 2021
- August 2021
- July 2021
- June 2021
- May 2021
- April 2021
- March 2021
- February 2021
- January 2021
- December 2020
- November 2020
- October 2020
- September 2020
- August 2020
- July 2020
- June 2020
- May 2020
- April 2020
- March 2020
- February 2020
- January 2020
- December 2019
- November 2019
- October 2019
- September 2019
- August 2019
- July 2019
- June 2019
- May 2019
- April 2019
- March 2019
- February 2019
- January 2019
- December 2018
- November 2018
- October 2018
- September 2018
- August 2018
- July 2018
- June 2018
- May 2018
- April 2018
- March 2018
- February 2018
- January 2018
- December 2017
- November 2017
- October 2017
- September 2017
- August 2017
- July 2017
- June 2017
- May 2017
- April 2017
- March 2017
- February 2017
- January 2017
- December 2016
- November 2016
- October 2016
- September 2016
- August 2016
- July 2016
- June 2016
- May 2016
- April 2016
- March 2016
- February 2016
- January 2016
- December 2015
- November 2015
- October 2015
- September 2015
- August 2015
- July 2015
- June 2015
- May 2015
- April 2015
- March 2015
- February 2015
- January 2015
- December 2014
- November 2014
- October 2014
- September 2014
- August 2014
- July 2014
- June 2014
- May 2014
- April 2014
- March 2014
- February 2014
- January 2014
- December 2013
- November 2013
- October 2013
- September 2013
- August 2013
- July 2013
- June 2013
- May 2013
- April 2013
- March 2013
- February 2013
- January 2013
- December 2012
- November 2012
- October 2012
- September 2012
- August 2012
- July 2012
- June 2012
- May 2012
- April 2012
- March 2012
- February 2012
- January 2012
- December 2011
- November 2011
- October 2011
- September 2011
- August 2011
- July 2011
- June 2011
- May 2011
- April 2011
- March 2011
- February 2011
- January 2011
- December 2010
- November 2010
- October 2010
- September 2010
- August 2010
- July 2010
- June 2010
- May 2010
- April 2010
- March 2010
- February 2010
- January 2010
- December 2009
- November 2009
- October 2009
- September 2009
- August 2009