
Target Test Prep's 2024 GMAT Focus Edition prep is discounted for the BTG community!
Redeem
The GMAT Official Guide 2019 edition, part 1
Ah, June. The days are long, the snow is a distant memory (for a few more months at least), and I get to work through the new problems in the Official Guide!
Thats right, the Official Guide for GMAT Review 2019, aka the OG, has landed. Lets dive right in!
If you have already bought the 2018 edition, youre okay; you can continue to work through that guide. About 15% of the questions in OG2019 are new. If, later, you feel you want more, you can decide at that point whether you want to get the 2019 OG or whether you want to get some other officialsource questions, such as the online Official Practice Questions or GMAT Focus.
Chapter 3 is a Diagnostic test consisting of the same 100 questions that were in the previous editions. The Diagnostic questions are, on the whole, good questions, so I can understand why the makers of the GMAT (GMAC) are not swapping out these questions.
Chapter 4, the math review, has the same math content (it does have a slightly expanded introduction3 paragraphs vs. 1).
In this installment, well concentrate on chapter 5 (Problem Solving, PS). There are some trends in the mix of new questions that I find really interesting.
Note: I cant reproduce the text of questions for copyright reasons, but Ill cite the problem number of any question I discuss so that you can look it up if you do decide to buy the 2019 edition.
Whats new in Problem Solving for the 2019 edition?
There are 35 new PS problems (and 35 old problems were dropped).
As has been the trend for multiple years now, the lowestnumbered new problems (such as #2 and #4) really do just require you to have some basic computation skills. But I noticed even more of a trend throughout toward not having to truly calculate / compute everything. You can use a ton of estimation and logic to save yourself steps while trying to answer these questions.
And this is fantastic! After all, bschool isnt a math programand when you do need to do real math, youll have Excel. I love that the GMAT keeps moving more and more towards the idea of can you think about quantitative topics? After all, thats extremely relevant for graduate management education.
Multiple times, I was able to stop solving before getting to the final answer because it was clear that only one answer among the five given could actually work. It almost felt Data Sufficiencylike at times! Try out problems 8 and 9 and tell me where you can stop.
There were multiple opportunities to Work Backwards, in particular on some long story problem where the answers represented the first number in the story. In that case, we might as well start from the answers and just take the numbers straight on through the story. Try out #22 to see what I mean.
I also saw multiple Max/Min variations. Any problem can be turned into a Maximum or Minimum problem. Basically, I just write a problem that asks you to find the maximum possible value of X (rather than the more common What is the value of X?"). In this case, while youre going through the steps of the solution, youll have to minimize or maximize other values in order to minimize or maximize the desired ending value. I already referenced #2 as a more straightforward computation problem; its also a Max/Min. If you want to see a harder one, try #80.
And if you want to combine Working Backwards and Max / Min, youre in luck! Try #40.
Overall, of the 35 new questions, 32 of them are numbered 80 or lowerthat is, theyre on the easier side of the spectrum. Only 3 problems are up in the 100s and the highestnumbered new problem is #137.
I still do think there are great lessons to learn in these new problems, so dont neglect them. Youll be able to pick up some tricks that can help you on other, harder problems in this chapter and elsewhere.
Finally, want to test yourself?
Try #70. This is a lot of work! How can you streamline this? (The official solution shows a longer way to do it.)
Now try #62. Despite the seeminglylow number, I think it can be quite easy to get turned around on this one.
And finally, try the one that I think is the hardest of all of the new PS problems: #55. Is there a good way to make a guess if you cant figure this one out?
Stuck? Here are some hints. Dont look until you really need to!
#70: Dont dive right in and start solving. Think about the story; in fact, pretend this is your small business. Make it your story!
Youve got your costs and your revenues. What do you really care about in business? It's not the costs or the revenues individually but what they tell you together
#62: What does it mean to divide by 1/2? What really happens?
#55: Wow this is a beast. And thats my first clue. Nobody can calculate this in 2 minutes without a calculator. So there must be some kind of pattern. Whats the pattern?
Need another hint? Here you go.
#70: Profits. You have startup costs of $9,900. And you have profits of $0.55 per unit ($1.20 $0.65). How can you use the profit figure to streamline the math you need to do?
#62: The problem asks which answer is closest to the given fraction.
#55: Look at the answers. Whats the range of options? Can you get rid of some possibilities?
Solutions
#70: I had to sink $9,900 into this business just to get up and running. So how much profit do I need to make until Ive covered that initial cost? Thats the real question here.
For each unit I sell, I make back $0.55. How many units do I need to sell to get to $9,900?
Glance at the answers. Theyre really far apart. Excellent! Lets estimate. Lets say I make $0.50 per unit and I want to make $10,000. Id need to sell 20,000 units to get there. Is that the answer?
Not quite. We estimated, remember? First, we actually only need $9,900, so thats slightly under 20,000 units. Plus, were actually making $0.55 per unit, not just $0.50, so we need even fewer units to make back that initial investment. The next lower number is 18,000, and the one below that is all the way down at 15,000. Thats too low; the answer must be 18,000.
The correct answer is (D).
#62: First, rewrite. Dividing by 1/2 is the same thing as multiplying by 2.
(7/8 + 1/9)(2)
Next, we could multiply that 2 into the other stuff in the fractionbut that doesnt actually make it any easier to add up those fractions. Im still stuck dealing with those different common denominators.
Now, I could do straight up computation herebut the problem asked me what answer is closest to this thing. Why do more work than I have to?
The problem wouldve been a whole lot easier if theyd just given me the same denominators, so lets make it so. Lets change 1/9 to the slightly larger fraction 1/8:
(7/8 + 1/8)(2) = (8/8)(2) = (1)(2) = 2
This value is slightly higher than the real value, but not all that much higher. Glance at the answers. 2 is closest.
Are you worried that maybe the fact that we rounded could mean that 3/2 is the answer? By how much did we round in this case?
We went from 1/9 to 1/8; the difference there is a really tiny fraction. Thats not enough to kick the answer all the way down to 3/2, which is a whole 1/2 lower than the number 2. So were good here.
The correct answer is (A).
#55: Write out the first few values so that you can examine the pattern:
1 + 1/4 + 1/9 + 1/16 +
Now glance at the answers. It could be 2. Or 3. Or less than 2, between 2 and 3, or greater than 3.
So lets call 2 and 3 our anchor pointsthe easiest of the possible answers. Can you tell whether the sum can get at least up to 2? Or, if it crosses 2, can you get up to 3?
1 + 1/4 = 1.25. Still have another 0.75 to go.
Wed need another 1/4 just to get up to 1.5. But the next number in the sequence is 1/9, which is less than half of 1/4. So adding 1/9 isnt even going to get us up to 1.5. Maybe were at like 1.3 or 1.35 now? (Pro tip: 1/9 is really close to 1/10. In fact, 1/9 = 11.1%, so technically were up to about 1.36 now. But you dont really need to know thata rough estimate is good enough.)
Okay, so were at 1.35ish. The next number to add is 1/16, which is even smaller than 1/9. Even if we could add another 1/9 right now, we still wouldnt get up to 1.5so were maybe at about 1.4 now.
We do keep adding a little bit each time, but that little bit that we add keeps getting smaller and smaller and smaller. The last number added is a minuscule 1/100. So were not even going to get up close to 2.
The correct answer is (E).
(Turns out, the sum is about 1.54 and changeif you care to know!)
Join me next time, when well review the new Data Sufficiency problems in OG 2018. Until then, happy studying!
Recent Articles
Archive
 March 2024
 February 2024
 January 2024
 December 2023
 November 2023
 October 2023
 September 2023
 July 2023
 June 2023
 May 2023
 April 2023
 March 2023
 February 2023
 January 2023
 December 2022
 November 2022
 October 2022
 September 2022
 August 2022
 July 2022
 June 2022
 May 2022
 April 2022
 March 2022
 February 2022
 January 2022
 December 2021
 November 2021
 October 2021
 September 2021
 August 2021
 July 2021
 June 2021
 May 2021
 April 2021
 March 2021
 February 2021
 January 2021
 December 2020
 November 2020
 October 2020
 September 2020
 August 2020
 July 2020
 June 2020
 May 2020
 April 2020
 March 2020
 February 2020
 January 2020
 December 2019
 November 2019
 October 2019
 September 2019
 August 2019
 July 2019
 June 2019
 May 2019
 April 2019
 March 2019
 February 2019
 January 2019
 December 2018
 November 2018
 October 2018
 September 2018
 August 2018
 July 2018
 June 2018
 May 2018
 April 2018
 March 2018
 February 2018
 January 2018
 December 2017
 November 2017
 October 2017
 September 2017
 August 2017
 July 2017
 June 2017
 May 2017
 April 2017
 March 2017
 February 2017
 January 2017
 December 2016
 November 2016
 October 2016
 September 2016
 August 2016
 July 2016
 June 2016
 May 2016
 April 2016
 March 2016
 February 2016
 January 2016
 December 2015
 November 2015
 October 2015
 September 2015
 August 2015
 July 2015
 June 2015
 May 2015
 April 2015
 March 2015
 February 2015
 January 2015
 December 2014
 November 2014
 October 2014
 September 2014
 August 2014
 July 2014
 June 2014
 May 2014
 April 2014
 March 2014
 February 2014
 January 2014
 December 2013
 November 2013
 October 2013
 September 2013
 August 2013
 July 2013
 June 2013
 May 2013
 April 2013
 March 2013
 February 2013
 January 2013
 December 2012
 November 2012
 October 2012
 September 2012
 August 2012
 July 2012
 June 2012
 May 2012
 April 2012
 March 2012
 February 2012
 January 2012
 December 2011
 November 2011
 October 2011
 September 2011
 August 2011
 July 2011
 June 2011
 May 2011
 April 2011
 March 2011
 February 2011
 January 2011
 December 2010
 November 2010
 October 2010
 September 2010
 August 2010
 July 2010
 June 2010
 May 2010
 April 2010
 March 2010
 February 2010
 January 2010
 December 2009
 November 2009
 October 2009
 September 2009
 August 2009