-
Target Test Prep 20% Off Flash Sale is on! Code: FLASH20
Redeem
The GMAT Official Guide 2019 edition, part 3
Welcome back to our series on the new Official Guide (OG) books! (If youd like, you can start with the first installment of this article series.) Todays post focuses on the Sentence Correction questions in the big OG.
Sentence Correction
The OG 2019 edition added 21 new SC questions (and lost 21 old ones). I didnt see anything particularly new or surprising in the new questions, though I do think there are some quite nice ones from a study perspective.
I noticed a lot of issues around Sentence Structure, Modifiers, Meaning, and Parallelismand that didnt surprise me at all. The GMAT has continued to move more towards these global issues in recent years, so the new edition just follows that trend.
SC problems do test multiple issues at once, but I also assign a main category to each onethe thing that I think is most helpful in either parsing the original sentence or eliminating as many answer choices as possible (or, ideally, both). By that measure, heres how I labeled the 21 problems:
Sentence Structure: 5
Modifiers: 5
Meaning: 2*
Parallelism: 4
Comparisons: 2
Verbs: 2
Idioms: 1
*I had to put an asterisk next to Meaning for this reason: A lot of the time, I really want to label something, for example, Modifiers / Meaning, because half the time, its really that a grammar rule isnt quite properly appliedand that leads to a meaning issue. But I make myself choose just one category, so I mostly end up labeling something Meaning only when meaning is messed up in multiple different ways or when the main issue is some sort of redundancy or illogical meaning in the overall language usage.
I also do a secondary labeling of everything that that problem testsso pronouns don't show up at all in my main categorization but they do in the sub-categories (still not much though).
A Couple of Problems
Ill definitely be teaching #678 to my students. Its a great problem for learning about core sentence structure and how to unpack a complicated sentence. I cant give you the exact language (copyright law!) but you could go onto Amazon and look up this book. Use the search inside feature to find this problem (search for the text Travelers from Earth including the quote marks).
Kind of messy, huh? The technical nature of the topic makes it hard to tell whether the intention is to list four totally separate things that are each equally parallel? Or whether some of these things are modifiers and so they should be introduced with -ing words?
Compare each item with the next. I have to endure low gravity. And is that whats helping me avoid radiation? Not really. Presumably, the spaceship Im riding in will shield me from radiation. And that stuff definitely isnt how Ill be contending with (the) soil of Mars.
These really are just four separate things Id have to do if I ever want to go to Mars. (And...I kind of do want to go to Mars. How about you? ;) )
Heres a similar sentence structure that makes the overall idea more clear:
To go to business school, you would have to write multiple essays, studying for the GMAT, plus asking colleagues for recommendations, and perhaps even move to a new city.
That sentence structure is built off of the original sentence (which is incorrect in this problem). Mine doesnt look as bad because the topic is a normal oneso its easier to see that these different items are not parallel but should be. (In other words, the correct answer should use a 4-item List structure.)
If I can make these kinds of connectionsfrom easier sentences with the same structure to the actual hard ones they give me on the testI have a better shot at understanding what the sentence is really trying to say. And if I can do that, Im more likely to be able to avoid the traps and get myself to the correct answer.
Im also a big fan of #727. The various options combine a verb tense (either attracted or have attracted) with a time marker beginning with either the word after or the word since. Heres my own version of whats going on in part of this problem:
(A) The roses have attracted bees after I placed them outside.
(B) The roses attracted bees since I placed them outside.
(C) The roses have attracted bees since I placed them outside.
What do you notice?
Have attracted is in the present perfect tensea tense that crosses over from past to present. So I shouldnt use it in combination with after (something happened in the past), since after implies that the action is over and done. I need to pair have attracted with since in order to convey that started in the past but crossing over into the present sense that present perfect is designed to give.
And, for that same reason, I don't want to pair the past tense attracted with the word since. That word, since, also introduces the idea of something that started in the past but carries over into the present (ever since thenfrom then until now).
So answers (A) and (B) are incorrect. Answer (C) is fine.
I could also write a correct sentence this way:
The roses attracted bees after I placed them outside.
But of course, I cant give you both that option and option (C) aboveor Ill have made you choose between two correct answers. :)
Thats all for today; join me next time when Ill cover Critical Reasoning and Reading Comprehension. And happy studying!
Recent Articles
Archive
- April 2024
- March 2024
- February 2024
- January 2024
- December 2023
- November 2023
- October 2023
- September 2023
- July 2023
- June 2023
- May 2023
- April 2023
- March 2023
- February 2023
- January 2023
- December 2022
- November 2022
- October 2022
- September 2022
- August 2022
- July 2022
- June 2022
- May 2022
- April 2022
- March 2022
- February 2022
- January 2022
- December 2021
- November 2021
- October 2021
- September 2021
- August 2021
- July 2021
- June 2021
- May 2021
- April 2021
- March 2021
- February 2021
- January 2021
- December 2020
- November 2020
- October 2020
- September 2020
- August 2020
- July 2020
- June 2020
- May 2020
- April 2020
- March 2020
- February 2020
- January 2020
- December 2019
- November 2019
- October 2019
- September 2019
- August 2019
- July 2019
- June 2019
- May 2019
- April 2019
- March 2019
- February 2019
- January 2019
- December 2018
- November 2018
- October 2018
- September 2018
- August 2018
- July 2018
- June 2018
- May 2018
- April 2018
- March 2018
- February 2018
- January 2018
- December 2017
- November 2017
- October 2017
- September 2017
- August 2017
- July 2017
- June 2017
- May 2017
- April 2017
- March 2017
- February 2017
- January 2017
- December 2016
- November 2016
- October 2016
- September 2016
- August 2016
- July 2016
- June 2016
- May 2016
- April 2016
- March 2016
- February 2016
- January 2016
- December 2015
- November 2015
- October 2015
- September 2015
- August 2015
- July 2015
- June 2015
- May 2015
- April 2015
- March 2015
- February 2015
- January 2015
- December 2014
- November 2014
- October 2014
- September 2014
- August 2014
- July 2014
- June 2014
- May 2014
- April 2014
- March 2014
- February 2014
- January 2014
- December 2013
- November 2013
- October 2013
- September 2013
- August 2013
- July 2013
- June 2013
- May 2013
- April 2013
- March 2013
- February 2013
- January 2013
- December 2012
- November 2012
- October 2012
- September 2012
- August 2012
- July 2012
- June 2012
- May 2012
- April 2012
- March 2012
- February 2012
- January 2012
- December 2011
- November 2011
- October 2011
- September 2011
- August 2011
- July 2011
- June 2011
- May 2011
- April 2011
- March 2011
- February 2011
- January 2011
- December 2010
- November 2010
- October 2010
- September 2010
- August 2010
- July 2010
- June 2010
- May 2010
- April 2010
- March 2010
- February 2010
- January 2010
- December 2009
- November 2009
- October 2009
- September 2009
- August 2009