-
Target Test Prep 20% Off Flash Sale is on! Code: FLASH20
Redeem
How to Analyze a GMATPrep Problem Solving Question
Last week, we took a look at how to analyze a Critical Reasoning question. This week, were going to do the same with a Problem Solving question. The GMATPrep problem were using this week is one that weve already discussed how to solve in a previous article; click here to read that article and try the problem first.
Heres the problem again; if you didnt read the first article and try the problem already, then try this problem now:
Three boxes of supplies have an average (arithmetic mean) weight of 7 kilograms and a median weight of 9 kilograms. What is the maximum possible weight, in kilograms, of the lightest box?(A) 1
(B) 2
(C) 3
(D) 4
(E) 5
After trying the problem, checking the answer, and reading and understanding the solution (read the original article, linked above), I try to answer these questions:
1. Did I know WHAT they were trying to test?
Was I able to CATEGORIZE this question by topic and subtopic? By process / technique? If I had to look something up in my books, would I know exactly where to go?
- The question is a Problem Solving question from the Statistics chapter of my Word Translations book. Its specifically testing the concept of average (arithmetic mean) and median, plus its a max / min problem. There are real numbers, so I wont be using lots of variables or picking my own numbers here I will have to somehow set up and solve using the numbers they gave me.
Did I COMPREHEND the symbols, text, questions, statements, and answer choices? Can I comprehend it all now, when I have lots of time to think about it? What do I need to do to make sure that I do comprehend everything here? How am I going to remember whatever I've just learned for future?
- Average / mean is characterized by the formula A = S/n, where A is the average of the set, S is the sum of the items in the set, and n is the number of items in the set. The median is the middle number in a set with an odd number of terms (which is the case in this problem: there are 3 boxes). (How would I have handled it if there had been an even number of terms? If I dont remember, I go check my book, even though I dont need to know for this specific problem.)
Did I understand the actual CONTENT (facts, knowledge) being tested?
- See last answer. Also, they want me to find the maximum (highest) possible weight of one particular box. The problem uses kilograms throughout, so I dont need to worry about keeping track of units or converting anything (but I still needed to check!).
2. How well did I HANDLE what they were trying to test?
Did I choose the best APPROACH? Or is there a better way to do the problem? (There's almost always a better way!) What is that better way? How am I going to remember this better approach the next time I see a similar problem?
- (See the original article, linked at the top, for a detailed discussion of the best approach. Here, Ill pretend that I didnt use the best approach.) Max / min questions require me to figure out what I have to maximize and what I have to minimize. I should have been thinking about that from the moment I saw the word maximum in the problem, but I forgot about that and just tested various numbers for the heaviest box instead, so I took longer than I should have to solve. Next time I see a max / min problem, Im going to write down the relevant word (max or min) and put a circle around it immediately.
Did I have the SKILLS to follow through? Or did I fall short on anything?
- I did get it right eventually, but I took too long, because I didnt think the problem through from the point of view of what needed to be minimized in order to maximize the lightest box. I need to do a few max / min problems to drill the process so that I can do this problem as efficiently as possible.
Did I make any careless mistakes? If so, WHY did I make each mistake? What habits could I make or break to minimize the chances of repeating that careless mistake in future?
- I didnt make any mistakes that caused me to get this one wrong, but I can guess what kinds of mistakes people might make. People might not notice that the information about the median tells us the exact weight of the middle box, so that figure cannot change. The only two that we dont know for sure are the lightest and the heaviest. Alternatively, even if I had used the proper max / min approach, I might have made the mistake of thinking that the heaviest box had to be 10 instead of 9 (that is, I would have made the mistake of thinking the heaviest box had to be heavier than the middle one, when they could actually have the same weight). That would have led me to pick wrong answer B.
Am I comfortable with OTHER STRATEGIES that would have worked, at least partially? How should I have made an educated guess?
- I tried testing random numbers for the weight of the heaviest box. If Im going to pick numbers anyway, I should let the problem guide me. The five answers are all small integers; I could have just tried those to see which one worked. When plugging the answers back into the problem, I want to start with either B or D (it doesnt matter which; pick whichever one looks like it will be the easiest to calculate). Lets try D first. The lightest box is 4 kg and the middle box is still 9 kg; together, they add up to 13. The total weight for all three boxes is 21, so the heaviest box would be 21 13 = 8. Is that okay? No that makes the heaviest box lighter than the middle box. So 4 kg is too heavy for the lightest box; cross off choices D and E (because E is even heavier than D!). Now, try B.
- If the lightest box is 2 kg, and the middle box is 9 kg, then the two boxes add up to 11. The total weight for all three boxes is 21, so that would mean the heaviest box would be 21 11 = 10 kg. Is that possible? Sure, because 10 is greater than or equal to 9. Could I make the lightest box even heavier, though? Possibly; I should try answer C. If the lightest box is 3 kg, that will make the heaviest 9 kg. Is that possible? Yep! And thats the largest remaining answer choice, so its the right answer.
Do I understand every TRAP & TRICK that the writer built into the question, including wrong answers?
- Someone might pick E because the question asks for the maximum, and E represents the largest of the five answer choices; likewise, someone might mis-read the question and pick A because the question asks us to calculate the weight of the lightest box and A represents the smallest of the answer choices. I already figured out the trap for B earlier: thinking that the largest box has to be heavier than the middle box. I would guess B is the biggest trap the most common mistake.
3. How well did I or could I RECOGNIZE what was going on?
Did I make a CONNECTION to previous experience? If so, what problem(s) did this remind me of and what, precisely, was similar? Or did I have to do it all from scratch? If so, see the next bullet.
Can I make any CONNECTIONS now, while I'm analyzing the problem? What have I done in the past that is similar to this one? How are they similar? How could that recognition have helped me to do this problem more efficiently or effectively? (This may involve looking up some past problem and making comparisons between the two!)
- Yes. I recognized that this was a mean + median question and I knew how to deal with both of those concepts. I could have done better with my handling of max / min though; I did know how to deal with max / min problems already, but I glossed over the word maximum when I first read this problem.
HOW will I recognize similar problems in the future? What can I do now to maximize the chances that I will remember and be able to use lessons learned from this problem the next time I see a new problem that tests something similar?
- I need to do everything I already described in my notes above. Im also going to re-do this problem actually make myself write out the best way to do it, alternate ways to do it, and so on, so that I really remember the lessons. Then, because my big problem on this one was with the max / min stuff, Im going to find another max / min problem and practice: (1) immediately writing max or min down and circling it, (2) thinking through the problem using the max / min process from the start, and (3) if appropriate, try to use the answer choices to solve. (And Im going to do the full analysis on any new problems I do, too.) Ill also find some other problems of different types in which the answer choices are small easy numbers and practice plugging in the answers on those as well.
And thats it! Note that, of course, the details above are specific to each individual person such a write-up would be different for every single one of you, depending upon your particular strengths, weaknesses, and mistakes. Hopefully, though, this gives you a better idea of the way to analyze a problem. This framework also gives you a valuable way to discuss problems with fellow online students or in study groups this is the kind of discussion that really helps to maximize scores.
* GMATPrep question courtesy of the Graduate Management Admissions Council. Usage of this question does not imply endorsement by GMAC.
Recent Articles
Archive
- April 2024
- March 2024
- February 2024
- January 2024
- December 2023
- November 2023
- October 2023
- September 2023
- July 2023
- June 2023
- May 2023
- April 2023
- March 2023
- February 2023
- January 2023
- December 2022
- November 2022
- October 2022
- September 2022
- August 2022
- July 2022
- June 2022
- May 2022
- April 2022
- March 2022
- February 2022
- January 2022
- December 2021
- November 2021
- October 2021
- September 2021
- August 2021
- July 2021
- June 2021
- May 2021
- April 2021
- March 2021
- February 2021
- January 2021
- December 2020
- November 2020
- October 2020
- September 2020
- August 2020
- July 2020
- June 2020
- May 2020
- April 2020
- March 2020
- February 2020
- January 2020
- December 2019
- November 2019
- October 2019
- September 2019
- August 2019
- July 2019
- June 2019
- May 2019
- April 2019
- March 2019
- February 2019
- January 2019
- December 2018
- November 2018
- October 2018
- September 2018
- August 2018
- July 2018
- June 2018
- May 2018
- April 2018
- March 2018
- February 2018
- January 2018
- December 2017
- November 2017
- October 2017
- September 2017
- August 2017
- July 2017
- June 2017
- May 2017
- April 2017
- March 2017
- February 2017
- January 2017
- December 2016
- November 2016
- October 2016
- September 2016
- August 2016
- July 2016
- June 2016
- May 2016
- April 2016
- March 2016
- February 2016
- January 2016
- December 2015
- November 2015
- October 2015
- September 2015
- August 2015
- July 2015
- June 2015
- May 2015
- April 2015
- March 2015
- February 2015
- January 2015
- December 2014
- November 2014
- October 2014
- September 2014
- August 2014
- July 2014
- June 2014
- May 2014
- April 2014
- March 2014
- February 2014
- January 2014
- December 2013
- November 2013
- October 2013
- September 2013
- August 2013
- July 2013
- June 2013
- May 2013
- April 2013
- March 2013
- February 2013
- January 2013
- December 2012
- November 2012
- October 2012
- September 2012
- August 2012
- July 2012
- June 2012
- May 2012
- April 2012
- March 2012
- February 2012
- January 2012
- December 2011
- November 2011
- October 2011
- September 2011
- August 2011
- July 2011
- June 2011
- May 2011
- April 2011
- March 2011
- February 2011
- January 2011
- December 2010
- November 2010
- October 2010
- September 2010
- August 2010
- July 2010
- June 2010
- May 2010
- April 2010
- March 2010
- February 2010
- January 2010
- December 2009
- November 2009
- October 2009
- September 2009
- August 2009