# Executive Assessment: Fast Math for Faster Solutions - Part 2

*by*, Sep 24, 2017

Last time, I gave you a couple of questions to try and then we discussed how to minimize your work on the first one. (If you havent read the first installment yet, go do that now.) Today, were going to review the second problem.

Heres the second Executive Assessment problem from the official free practice set (this one is labeled #3 in the PS set on the EA website, as of September 2017):

According to the table below, the number of fellows was approximately what percent of the total membership of Organization X?(A) 9%

(B) 12%

(C) 18%

(D) 25%

(E) 35%

Before we dive in, what principles do you remember from our discussion of the first problem?

Think about it.

Keep thinking about it.

Dont read below yet.

Okay, here are some things I remember. :) Dont do math unless / until I have to. If I do have to do some calculations, lay things out first, then look at everything to decide what the best path is (and to see whether I can spot any shortcuts!).

These principles are reflected in the below graphic:

When a new problem first pops up, I glance: What have I got, big picture? Without reading the full text, I can see the following things: a tablewith some fairly annoying numbers. Also, the answers are percentages, so this is a percent problem of some kind.

The annoying numbers are making me wonder whether Ill be able to estimate. Im going to keep an eye out for that possibility as I go to my next step, Read.

Yep, its a percent problem. What do they want? Jot it down.

Dont start solving yet! Go to the second row: Reflect & Organize.

Glance at the Fellows number. Annoying. And then the total? I have to add that up. Ugh.

Look at the answers again. The bottom three are decently far apartestimation would probably be close enough.

(A) 9%(B) 12%

(C) 18% 20% = 1/5

(D) 25% = 25% = 1/4

(E) 35% 33.3% = 1/3

But answers (A) and (B) are both around 10% ... hmm.

I know! If it does seem to be between those two, then I can estimate whether the number is greater than 10% or less than 10%thats not a hard estimate to make.

Great, now that I actually have an angle to solve, I can go ahead and do the work.

Oh, wait, one more annoying part to consider: adding up the five numbers to get the total. I only need to estimate, so I can estimate the individual numbers, first of all. I can also try to put them together into pairs that add up to nice numbers. Okay, let's do this.

The first one is 78, which is almost 100. Look for another number that would pair well with 100: how about Associate Members, at 27,909? Add them up to get about 28,000, a nice number.

Any others?

9,200 and 2,300 equal 11,500, another nice-ish number.

That leaves 35,500oh, lets pair that with 11,500 to get an even 47k. Then add in the 28k to get about 75k. Nice!

Now, the top of the fraction is the 9,200 number. Maybe 9k is close enough. Whats 9k / 75k? Or 9 / 75?

Reflect for a moment again. Dividing that fraction is kind of annoying.

Im trying to find a percent. Percent literally means of 100wouldnt it have been nice if the fraction had already had 100 on the bottom? SO annoying that it doesnt

Hmm

Is there any way to get that number on the bottom to be 100 instead of 75 ?

What did we do with that 75% in the first problem (in the first installment of this series)? Go back and take a look.

(Seriously, go look! See what, if anything, you can figure out on your own before you keep reading.)

To go from 75% to 100%, take the 75% figure, divide by 3 to get 25%, then multiply by 4 to get 100%.

BUT, if Im going to do that with the bottom of the fraction, then I have to do the same thing to the top of the fraction. I can manipulate a fraction in any way that I like as long as I do the same thing to the top and the bottom.

So, take 9, divide by 3 to get 3, then multiply by 4 to get 12. Boom! The new fraction is 12 / 100. Look at the answerswe have an exact match at 12%. :)

The correct answer is (B).

What did you learn on this problem? Think about your takeaways before you read mine.

Join me next time, for another installment in this series.

## Key Takeaways for EA Fast Math:

(1) You often dont need to calculate exact values. Look for opportunities to estimate and do back-of-the-envelope calculations wherever possible.

(2) Different problems might have some shortcuts in common; when you learn something on one problem, look for opportunities to apply that learning on different-but-similar-in-some-way problems. The 75% 100% thing doesnt require a table or even necessarily a story. It doesnt even need to be 75% to startit just requires you to know that youre trying to get to 100% from a number thats a little annoying.

(3) Turn that knowledge into Know the Code flash cards:

* Executive Assessment questions courtesy of the Graduate Management Admissions Council. Usage of this question does not imply endorsement by GMAC.

###### Recent Articles

###### Archive

- February 2020
- January 2020
- December 2019
- November 2019
- October 2019
- September 2019
- August 2019
- July 2019
- June 2019
- May 2019
- April 2019
- March 2019
- February 2019
- January 2019
- December 2018
- November 2018
- October 2018
- September 2018
- August 2018
- July 2018
- June 2018
- May 2018
- April 2018
- March 2018
- February 2018
- January 2018
- December 2017
- November 2017
- October 2017
- September 2017
- August 2017
- July 2017
- June 2017
- May 2017
- April 2017
- March 2017
- February 2017
- January 2017
- December 2016
- November 2016
- October 2016
- September 2016
- August 2016
- July 2016
- June 2016
- May 2016
- April 2016
- March 2016
- February 2016
- January 2016
- December 2015
- November 2015
- October 2015
- September 2015
- August 2015
- July 2015
- June 2015
- May 2015
- April 2015
- March 2015
- February 2015
- January 2015
- December 2014
- November 2014
- October 2014
- September 2014
- August 2014
- July 2014
- June 2014
- May 2014
- April 2014
- March 2014
- February 2014
- January 2014
- December 2013
- November 2013
- October 2013
- September 2013
- August 2013
- July 2013
- June 2013
- May 2013
- April 2013
- March 2013
- February 2013
- January 2013
- December 2012
- November 2012
- October 2012
- September 2012
- August 2012
- July 2012
- June 2012
- May 2012
- April 2012
- March 2012
- February 2012
- January 2012
- December 2011
- November 2011
- October 2011
- September 2011
- August 2011
- July 2011
- June 2011
- May 2011
- April 2011
- March 2011
- February 2011
- January 2011
- December 2010
- November 2010
- October 2010
- September 2010
- August 2010
- July 2010
- June 2010
- May 2010
- April 2010
- March 2010
- February 2010
- January 2010
- December 2009
- November 2009
- October 2009
- September 2009
- August 2009