-
BREAKING: Target Test Prep releases Brand New 2026 On Demand GMAT prep course
Redeem
GMATPrep Reading Comp: Tackling a Tough Passage - Part 3
In the first installment of this series, we deconstructed a challenging Reading Comprehension passage from the GMATPrep free exams. Pull up that page, as Im not going to repeat the full text of the passage here. (And if youre just starting here, go through parts 1 and 2 first before you read this one!)
At the end of the second installment, I posted the second problem for the passage. Lets figure it out!
Here it is again:
According to the passage, which of the following is true of comparable worth as a policy?(A) Comparable worth policy decisions in pay-inequity cases have often failed to satisfy the complainants.
(B) Comparable worth policies have been applied to both public-sector and private-sector employee pay schedules.
(C) Comparable worth as a policy has come to be widely criticized in the past decade.
(D) Many employers have considered comparable worth as a policy but very few have actually adopted it.
(E) Early implementations of comparable worth policies resulted in only transitory gains in pay equity.
Whats the first step?
Right, figure out what kind of RC problem this is. The language according to the passage signals that this is a Specific Detail question. On SD questions, your task is to find something that is specifically stated in the passage and spit it back to them as an answer.
So move to step 2: find the proof. What information do you need from the passage and where is that info located? The question stem asks what is true of comparable worth as a policy. Where do they talk about that?
The whole passage, of course, is about this CW idea, so it might be good to start by reminding yourself of what this idea is. Its a way to help close pay gaps and it works well even when youre dealing with different jobs, unlike some other methods.
Where, in general, does the passage detail the whole CW idea as a policy? Glance at your notes if needed; that was in paragraph 1. Review the text:
Comparable worth, as a standard applied to eliminate inequities in pay, insists that the values of certain tasks performed in dissimilar jobs can be compared. In the last decade, this approach has become a critical social policy issue, as large numbers of private-sector firms and industries as well as federal, state, and local governmental entities have adopted comparable worth policies or begun to consider doing so.
Now, I just want to caution you about something. The rest of the passage gets more at how CW has actually worked in practice (versus what the underlying policy is) and how it compares to some other policies. Its possible that youll need info from one of those paragraphs to answer the question, but dont go searching everything now. Thats a mistaketheyre trying to suck you into spending too much time.
Most likely, what you need is in paragraph 1, because paragraph 1 is where they discuss the overall policy, and thats what the question specifically asks.
In short: start with the most likely paragraph. If that doesnt work, you can decide at that point whether to look in another paragraph or whether to guess and move on. But dont try to review the entire passage now; just go for the most likely paragraph.
Okay, step 3: try to predict what you need in the answer. There are a few big details in this paragraph. CW applies when youre talking about dissimilar jobs. This approach has become a critical social policy issue. (In this sense, critical means important, not negative. Its critical that you study hard!) Finally, lots of organizations have started using CW or are considering doing so.
Now, you can take your final step: look at those answers and find a match.
(A) Comparable worth policy decisions in pay-inequity cases have often failed to satisfy the complainants.
This choice doesnt match anything in paragraph 1, but could it be somewhere else in the passage? Wait! Dont go searching yet. First, ask yourself: how does this choice fit in with the overall main point?
The main point of the passage was that this CW thing worked well in cases where other methods failed. CW didn't fail (at least, not according to this passage). So this choice doesnt fit with the main idea. Eliminate it.
(B) Comparable worth policies have been applied to both public-sector and private-sector employee pay schedules.
What does public-sector mean? Thats a synonym for government, as private-sector is typically a synonym for for-profit companies (whether the companies are privately-held or publicly-held). They do expect you to be familiar with this type of language, but note that they also gave you a clue in paragraph 1:
as large numbers of private-sector firms and industries as well as federal, state, and local governmental entities
They use the word private-sector in the passage, and they contrast that with governmental entities, so you can infer that the private ones are non-governmental. And then when you see public-sector, you can infer that this is the opposite of private, so this is a synonym for those governmental entities.
In short, this choice says that CW has been used by companies and by government groups. Hey! Thats exactly what paragraph 1 did say. This is the correct answer.
Do run your eye over the other answers, just to be thorough.
(C) Comparable worth as a policy has come to be widely criticized in the past decade.
Again, this doesnt match with the main idea, which generally praises CW. No good.
(D) Many employers have considered comparable worth as a policy but very few have actually adopted it.
We call this one a Direct Contradiction trap. The passage says the opposite: large numbers of employees have adopted it or are considering doing so.
These Direct Contradiction traps can be really tempting when you dont take the time to re-read the passage. You remember reading something about thatwhat was it again? And then you might fall into the trap of thinking that the passage said the opposite of what it really said.
(E) Early implementations of comparable worth policies resulted in only transitory gains in pay equity.
Transitory means temporary or not-long-lasting. If you dont know the word, then pay attention to the word only: it signals some kind of a negative. Only (blank) gains in pay equity isnt a good thing.
Paragraph 1 said nothing about early implementations of CW. It is possible that CW didnt work as well early on. And if you hadnt already found a good answer, maybe youd go look elsewhere in the passage for a discussion of the early implementation. But since you already know that (B) works and since the point of the passage was really that this CW thing has generally worked well at least in the longer-term, cross this one off.
The correct answer is (B).
I want to summarize the process here, because a consistent process is really whats going to help you most on these questions.
First, identify the question. According to the passage signals a Specific Detail question.
Second, find the proof. Figure out what you need to re-read in the passage in order to answer the question. (Do NOT skip this step. Do NOT rely on your memory. This is an open-book test! Re-read the needed material.)
Third, read that text and use it to formulate your own answer to the question. Your wording of course wont match the wording of the correct answer. Thats okay. Youre just trying to articulate to yourself the kinds of things you want the answer to say or address. Get that clear in your head (or even jot down a note or two) before you go to the final step.
Fourth, eliminate wrong answers and find a match! This is what I want to emphasize here: look at how much work comes before you get to look at the answers. Dont jump straight to the answers. Figure out whats going on with the question first!
All right, are you ready for the third problem in the set? Here you go!
Which of the following best describes an application of the principles of comparable worth as they are described in the passage?(A) The current pay, rates of increase, and rates of promotion for female mechanics are compared with those of male mechanics.
(B) The training, skills, and experience of computer programmers in one division of a corporation are compared to those of programmers making more money in another division.
(C) The number of women holding top executive positions in a corporation is compared to the number of women available for promotion to those positions, and both tallies are matched to the tallies for men in the same corporation.
(D) The skills, training, and job responsibilities of the clerks in the township tax assessors office are compared to those of the much better-paid township engineers.
(E) The working conditions of female workers in a hazardous-materials environment are reviewed and their pay schedules compared to those of all workers in similar environments across the nation.
In the next installment of this series, well talk about how to work your way through the above problem. I'll also give you another new problem from the set.
Key Takeaways for Specific Detail questions
(1) Follow the process. Dont skip steps!
(2) Even though these are detail questions, you can still use the main idea / main point to help you eliminate answer choices. If something contradicts the main point, its probably incorrect (unless that question was worded in such a way as to contradict the main point: e.g., what would the author disagree with?).
(3) Reading Comp is an open-book test. The passage is always there while youre answering questions. Dont feel like you need to learn everything the first time you read it and dont hesitate to go back to it whenever you need to do so.
* GMATPrep questions courtesy of the Graduate Management Admissions Council. Usage of this question does not imply endorsement by GMAC.
Recent Articles
- Best MBA for Real Estate: Top Schools, Career Paths & How to Choose
- The Best MBA Programs for Private Equity and Venture Capital
- Do You Need a Finalized Test Score Before You Hire an MBA Admissions Consultant?
- Best MBA for Entrepreneurship: Top Programs for Founders, Startups & Family Business Owners
- Am I Too Young for a Top MBA Program? Or Too Old?
Archive
- May 2026
- April 2026
- March 2026
- February 2026
- January 2026
- December 2025
- October 2025
- September 2025
- August 2025
- July 2025
- June 2025
- February 2025
- January 2025
- December 2024
- November 2024
- October 2024
- September 2024
- August 2024
- July 2024
- June 2024
- May 2024
- April 2024
- March 2024
- February 2024
- January 2024
- December 2023
- November 2023
- October 2023
- September 2023
- July 2023
- June 2023
- May 2023
- April 2023
- March 2023
- February 2023
- January 2023
- December 2022
- November 2022
- October 2022
- September 2022
- August 2022
- July 2022
- June 2022
- May 2022
- April 2022
- March 2022
- February 2022
- January 2022
- December 2021
- November 2021
- October 2021
- September 2021
- August 2021
- July 2021
- June 2021
- May 2021
- April 2021
- March 2021
- February 2021
- January 2021
- December 2020
- November 2020
- October 2020
- September 2020
- August 2020
- July 2020
- June 2020
- May 2020
- April 2020
- March 2020
- February 2020
- January 2020
- December 2019
- November 2019
- October 2019
- September 2019
- August 2019
- July 2019
- June 2019
- May 2019
- April 2019
- March 2019
- February 2019
- January 2019
- December 2018
- November 2018
- October 2018
- September 2018
- August 2018
- July 2018
- June 2018
- May 2018
- April 2018
- March 2018
- February 2018
- January 2018
- December 2017
- November 2017
- October 2017
- September 2017
- August 2017
- July 2017
- June 2017
- May 2017
- April 2017
- March 2017
- February 2017
- January 2017
- December 2016
- November 2016
- October 2016
- September 2016
- August 2016
- July 2016
- June 2016
- May 2016
- April 2016
- March 2016
- February 2016
- January 2016
- December 2015
- November 2015
- October 2015
- September 2015
- August 2015
- July 2015
- June 2015
- May 2015
- April 2015
- March 2015
- February 2015
- January 2015
- December 2014
- November 2014
- October 2014
- September 2014
- August 2014
- July 2014
- June 2014
- May 2014
- April 2014
- March 2014
- February 2014
- January 2014
- December 2013
- November 2013
- October 2013
- September 2013
- August 2013
- July 2013
- June 2013
- May 2013
- April 2013
- March 2013
- February 2013
- January 2013
- December 2012
- November 2012
- October 2012
- September 2012
- August 2012
- July 2012
- June 2012
- May 2012
- April 2012
- March 2012
- February 2012
- January 2012
- December 2011
- November 2011
- October 2011
- September 2011
- August 2011
- July 2011
- June 2011
- May 2011
- April 2011
- March 2011
- February 2011
- January 2011
- December 2010
- November 2010
- October 2010
- September 2010
- August 2010
- July 2010
- June 2010
- May 2010
- April 2010
- March 2010
- February 2010
- January 2010
- December 2009
- November 2009
- October 2009
- September 2009
- August 2009