-
BREAKING: Target Test Prep releases Brand New 2026 On Demand GMAT prep course
Redeem
Square Roots
Have you ever gotten a GMAT question wrong because you thought you were supposed to take a square root and get two different numbers but the answer key said only the positive root counted? Alternatively, have you ever gotten one wrong because you took the square root and wrote down just the positive root but the answer key said that, this time, both the positive and the negative root counted? Whats going on here?
There are a couple of rules we need to keep straight in terms of how standardized tests (including the GMAT) deal with square roots. The Official Guide does detail these rules, but enough students have questioned us about the OG explanation that we decided to write an article in hopes of clearing everything up. :)
I want to mention one thing before we dive in: the vast majority of the time, both roots do count, and its rare to miss an official question as long as you do take both roots. You could just decide that youre not going to worry about it and youre going to solve normally (always taking both square roots). Many students do still stress about this topic, though, so if youre in that group, read on!
Doesnt the OG say that were only supposed to take the positive root?
Sometimes this is true but not always. This is where the confusion arises. Heres a quote from the OG 13th edition, page 114:
Every positive number n has two square roots, one positive and one negative, but [pmath]sqrt{n}[/pmath]denotes the positive number whose square is n.
Hmm. Okay, so the first half seems quite clear that, if you take the square root, you should get two values. The second half of the sentence is a bit confusing though. Read the examples they give in the next two sentences:
For example, [pmath]sqrt{9}[/pmath]denotes 3. [However] The two square roots of 9 are [pmath]sqrt{9}[/pmath]= 3 and -[pmath]sqrt{9}[/pmath]= -3.
Huh? (The added However is mine, by the way.) Think of it this way: when they give us a square root symbol with an actual number underneath it not a variable then we should take only the positive root. If I ask you for the value of [pmath]sqrt{9}[/pmath], then the answer is 3, but not -3. That leads us to our first rule.
Rule #1: [pmath]sqrt{9}[/pmath]= 3 only, not -3
If the problem gives you an actual number below an actual square root symbol, then take only the positive root.
Note that there are no variables in that rule. Lets insert one: [pmath]sqrt{9}[/pmath]= x. What is x? In this case, x = 3, because whenever they give us a square root symbol with an actual number underneath, we take only the positive root; the rule doesnt change.
Okay, what if I change the problem to this: [pmath]sqrt{x}[/pmath]= 3. Now what is x? In this case, x = 9, but not -9. How do we know? Try plugging the actual number back into the problem. [pmath]sqrt{9}[/pmath]does equal 3. What does [pmath]sqrt{-9}[/pmath]equal? Nothing! Were not allowed to have negative signs underneath square root signs, so [pmath]sqrt{-9}[/pmath]doesnt work. The OG indicates this on page 114:
The square root of a negative number is not a real number.
Just as an aside, if the test did want us to take the negative root of some positive number under a square root sign, theyd give us this: -[pmath]sqrt{9}[/pmath]. First, wed take the square root of 9 to get 3 and then that negative sign would still be hanging out there. Voil! We have -3.
Im going to give you one more chance to bail. If youd like, you can stop here and just remember they give square root symbol with real number underneath, I take positive root. That will be enough for the vast majority of applications. If youd like to dig deeper, though, read on.
How else can this vary?
What if they dont give us a square root symbol? Lets say they ask for something that will require us to take the square root of 9 without showing the square root symbol themselves (perhaps they ask for x when [pmath]x^2[/pmath]= 9). What should I do? That brings us to our next rule.
Rule #2: [pmath]x^2[/pmath]= 9 means x = 3, x = -3
How are things different in this example? We no longer have a square root sign here, were dealing with an exponent. If we square the number 3, we get 9. If we square the number -3, we also get 9. Therefore, both numbers are possible values for x, because both make the equation true.
Mathematically, we would say that x = 3 or x = -3. If youre doing a Data Sufficiency problem, think of it this way: either one is a possible value for x, so both have to be considered possible values when deciding whether some piece of information is sufficient.
Were almost done, but theres one more (very rare) possibility. Again, feel free to skip if youve had enough.
Rule #3:[pmath]sqrt{x^2}[/pmath]= 3 means x = 3, x = -3
Okay, were back to our square root sign, but we also have an exponent this time! Now what? Do we take only the positive root, because we have a square root sign? Or do we take both positive and negative roots, because we have an exponent?
First, solve for the value of x: square both sides of [pmath]sqrt{x^2}[/pmath]= 3 to get [pmath]x^2[/pmath]= 9. Now, this looks just like our rule #2: we take the square root to get x = 3, x = -3.
If youre not sure that rule #2 (take both roots) should apply, try plugging the two answers into the original equation, x2 = 3 to see whether they make the equation true. If we plug 3 into the equation [pmath]sqrt{x^2}[/pmath]= 3, we get: [pmath]sqrt{3^2}[/pmath]= 3. Is this true? Yes: [pmath]sqrt{3^2}[/pmath]= [pmath]sqrt{9}[/pmath]and that does indeed equal 3.
Now, try plugging -3 into the equation:[pmath]sqrt{(-3)^2}[/pmath]= 3. We have a negative under the square root sign, but we also have an exponent. Follow the order of operations: square the number first to get [pmath]sqrt{9}[/pmath]. No more negative number under the exponent! Finishing off the problem, we get [pmath]sqrt{9}[/pmath]and once again that does equal 3, so -3 is also a possible value for x. The variable x could equal 3 or -3.
How am I going to remember all that?
Notice something: the first example has either a real number or a plain variable (no exponent) under the square root sign. In both circumstances, we solve only for the positive value of the root, not the negative one.
The second and third examples both include an exponent. Our second rule doesnt include any square root symbol at all if we have only exponents, no roots at all, then we can have both positive and negative roots. Our third rule does have a square root symbol, but it also has an exponent. In cases like this, well usually solve for both roots; if youre not sure, check the math just as we did in the above example. First, we solve for both solutions and then we plug both back into the original equation. Any answer that works, or gives us a true equation, is a valid possible solution.
Takeaways for Square Roots:
(1) If there is an actual number shown under an actual square root sign, then take only the positive root.
(2) If, on the other hand, there are variables and exponents involved, be careful. If you have only exponents and no square root sign, then take both roots. If you have both an exponent and a square root sign, youll have to do the math to see, but most of the time both the positive and negative roots will be valid.
(3) If youre not sure whether to include the negative root, try plugging it back into the original to see whether it produces a true answer (such as [pmath]sqrt{(-3)^2}[/pmath]= 3) or an invalid situation (such as [pmath]sqrt{-9}[/pmath], which doesnt equal any rational number).
* The text excerpted above from The Official Guide for GMAT Review 13th Edition is copyright GMAC (the Graduate Management Admissions Council). The short excerpts are quoted under fair-use statutes for scholarly or journalistic work; use of these excerpts does not imply endorsement of this article by GMAC.
Recent Articles
- Best MBA for Real Estate: Top Schools, Career Paths & How to Choose
- The Best MBA Programs for Private Equity and Venture Capital
- Do You Need a Finalized Test Score Before You Hire an MBA Admissions Consultant?
- Best MBA for Entrepreneurship: Top Programs for Founders, Startups & Family Business Owners
- Am I Too Young for a Top MBA Program? Or Too Old?
Archive
- May 2026
- April 2026
- March 2026
- February 2026
- January 2026
- December 2025
- October 2025
- September 2025
- August 2025
- July 2025
- June 2025
- February 2025
- January 2025
- December 2024
- November 2024
- October 2024
- September 2024
- August 2024
- July 2024
- June 2024
- May 2024
- April 2024
- March 2024
- February 2024
- January 2024
- December 2023
- November 2023
- October 2023
- September 2023
- July 2023
- June 2023
- May 2023
- April 2023
- March 2023
- February 2023
- January 2023
- December 2022
- November 2022
- October 2022
- September 2022
- August 2022
- July 2022
- June 2022
- May 2022
- April 2022
- March 2022
- February 2022
- January 2022
- December 2021
- November 2021
- October 2021
- September 2021
- August 2021
- July 2021
- June 2021
- May 2021
- April 2021
- March 2021
- February 2021
- January 2021
- December 2020
- November 2020
- October 2020
- September 2020
- August 2020
- July 2020
- June 2020
- May 2020
- April 2020
- March 2020
- February 2020
- January 2020
- December 2019
- November 2019
- October 2019
- September 2019
- August 2019
- July 2019
- June 2019
- May 2019
- April 2019
- March 2019
- February 2019
- January 2019
- December 2018
- November 2018
- October 2018
- September 2018
- August 2018
- July 2018
- June 2018
- May 2018
- April 2018
- March 2018
- February 2018
- January 2018
- December 2017
- November 2017
- October 2017
- September 2017
- August 2017
- July 2017
- June 2017
- May 2017
- April 2017
- March 2017
- February 2017
- January 2017
- December 2016
- November 2016
- October 2016
- September 2016
- August 2016
- July 2016
- June 2016
- May 2016
- April 2016
- March 2016
- February 2016
- January 2016
- December 2015
- November 2015
- October 2015
- September 2015
- August 2015
- July 2015
- June 2015
- May 2015
- April 2015
- March 2015
- February 2015
- January 2015
- December 2014
- November 2014
- October 2014
- September 2014
- August 2014
- July 2014
- June 2014
- May 2014
- April 2014
- March 2014
- February 2014
- January 2014
- December 2013
- November 2013
- October 2013
- September 2013
- August 2013
- July 2013
- June 2013
- May 2013
- April 2013
- March 2013
- February 2013
- January 2013
- December 2012
- November 2012
- October 2012
- September 2012
- August 2012
- July 2012
- June 2012
- May 2012
- April 2012
- March 2012
- February 2012
- January 2012
- December 2011
- November 2011
- October 2011
- September 2011
- August 2011
- July 2011
- June 2011
- May 2011
- April 2011
- March 2011
- February 2011
- January 2011
- December 2010
- November 2010
- October 2010
- September 2010
- August 2010
- July 2010
- June 2010
- May 2010
- April 2010
- March 2010
- February 2010
- January 2010
- December 2009
- November 2009
- October 2009
- September 2009
- August 2009