BREAKING: Target Test Prep releases Brand New 2026 On Demand GMAT prep course

Redeem

Target Test Prep · GMAT

Choose how you want to prepare

Learn live with an expert or move at your own pace. Every option includes the complete TTP study system.

★★★★★5.0559 reviews
GMATLiveTeach 7 seats left
Chris Peckover
NEXT LIVE COHORT

Oct 13 to Jan 7, 2027

with Chris Peckover

Schedule
Tue, Thu · 8:00 to 10:00 PM ET
Included
40 live hours + 6 months of GMAT OnDemand
  • Live instruction and real-time questions
  • Class recordings and assigned practice
View class & enroll
Limited cohort · enrollment openTarget Test Prep
EALiveTeach 5 seats left
Logan Thompson
EXECUTIVE ASSESSMENT

Sep 6 to Dec 6, 2026

with Logan Thompson

Schedule
Sun · 9:30 AM to 12:30 PM ET
Included
Live EA class + 6 months of EA OnDemand
  • Expert-led weekly online sessions
  • EA Masterclass access between classes
View EA class & enroll
Limited cohort · enrollment openTarget Test Prep
GMATOnDemand Start anytime
SELF-PACED MASTERCLASS

Target Test Prep GMAT OnDemand

Complete access from day one. Study on your schedule.

130-point score guarantee
$0to start then $127/mo
  • Personalized study plan and analytics
  • Thousands of lessons and practice questions
Start free 5-day trial
Read 559 reviewsTarget Test Prep

Compare the format, schedule, and included access before enrolling. Prices and seat counts shown reflect the supplied offer details.

Plursl/Singular

Expert replies
Post new topic Locked
Previous Topic Next Topic
Legendary Member
Posts: 683
Joined: Tue Jul 22, 2008 1:58 pmFollowed by: 2 members
Location: Dubai
Thanked: 73 times
by mals24 » Sat Nov 22, 2008 11:43 am
Should the verb in the following sentence be singular or plural.

Time and tide waits/wait for none

The horse and carriage is/are at the door.

Explain your answers.
Top
Join the discussion
Log in to postLogin with Googleuse password
QUOTE IN REPLY
Source: — Sentence Correction |
Legendary Member
Posts: 940
Joined: Tue Aug 26, 2008 3:22 amFollowed by: 1 member
Thanked: 55 times

Re: Plursl/Singular

by iamcste » Sat Nov 22, 2008 12:35 pm
mals24 wrote:Should the verb in the following sentence be singular or plural.

Time and tide waits/wait for none

The horse and carriage is/are at the door.

Explain your answers.

compound plural subjects always take plural verbs

But there is an exception.

if other word relates to the previous one ( 2 different words for the same thing or synonms) consider singular

hence waits and is
Top
Join the discussion
Log in to postLogin with Googleuse password
QUOTE IN REPLY
Legendary Member
Posts: 683
Joined: Tue Jul 22, 2008 1:58 pmFollowed by: 2 members
Location: Dubai
Thanked: 73 times

by mals24 » Sat Nov 22, 2008 12:44 pm
iamcste

Thanks for the reply. If you don't mind can you elaborate a bit more on this point.
if other word relates to the previous one
Top
Join the discussion
Log in to postLogin with Googleuse password
QUOTE IN REPLY
Legendary Member
Posts: 940
Joined: Tue Aug 26, 2008 3:22 amFollowed by: 1 member
Thanked: 55 times

by iamcste » Sat Nov 22, 2008 12:52 pm
mals24 wrote:iamcste

Thanks for the reply. If you don't mind can you elaborate a bit more on this point.
if other word relates to the previous one
tide is related to time

Tide is nothing but period of time ( low tide and high tide)

so, you can see the other word " tide " is related to the previous one "time"

Carriage and horse form one unit
Top
Join the discussion
Log in to postLogin with Googleuse password
QUOTE IN REPLY
Legendary Member
Posts: 683
Joined: Tue Jul 22, 2008 1:58 pmFollowed by: 2 members
Location: Dubai
Thanked: 73 times

by mals24 » Sat Nov 22, 2008 12:59 pm
Ohh okk finally made sense

If the 2 nouns are related to each other (logically), we will use a singular verb.

Thanks a ton iamcste :)
Top
Join the discussion
Log in to postLogin with Googleuse password
QUOTE IN REPLY
Legendary Member
Posts: 1153
Joined: Wed Jun 20, 2007 6:21 amFollowed by: 2 members
Thanked: 146 times

by parallel_chase » Sat Nov 22, 2008 1:04 pm
Here is another one.

The verb is singular if the two subjects separated by "and" refer to the same person or thing.

Red beans and rice is my mom's favorite dish.
No rest for the Wicked....
Top
Join the discussion
Log in to postLogin with Googleuse password
QUOTE IN REPLY
Legendary Member
Posts: 708
Joined: Sun Jun 01, 2008 4:59 amFollowed by: 1 member
Location: USA
Thanked: 13 times

by niraj_a » Sat Nov 22, 2008 1:04 pm
mals

do you have any SCs that deal with this? itd be nice to see this in action.
Top
Join the discussion
Log in to postLogin with Googleuse password
QUOTE IN REPLY
Legendary Member
Posts: 683
Joined: Tue Jul 22, 2008 1:58 pmFollowed by: 2 members
Location: Dubai
Thanked: 73 times

by mals24 » Sat Nov 22, 2008 1:27 pm
Exception to the 'and' rule:

1. If the 2 items are related.
2. If the items refer to the same person or thing.

Perfect I'm finally understanding this exception to the 'and' rule.

Thanks guys :)

@ niraj

Sorry niraj but I don't have a SC question which tests this exception. I found this rule in a grammar book so I kind of got confused. If I come across such a SC question I'll post it in the forum for sure.
Top
Join the discussion
Log in to postLogin with Googleuse password
QUOTE IN REPLY
Master | Next Rank: 500 Posts
Posts: 458
Joined: Sun Aug 31, 2008 10:44 amFollowed by: 1 member
Thanked: 3 times

by gmat009 » Sat Nov 22, 2008 6:24 pm
iamcste wrote:
mals24 wrote:iamcste

Thanks for the reply. If you don't mind can you elaborate a bit more on this point.
if other word relates to the previous one
tide is related to time

Tide is nothing but period of time ( low tide and high tide)

so, you can see the other word " tide " is related to the previous one "time"

Carriage and horse form one unit
What do you think about this sentence............

The skill and the precision of the Anasazi, ancient
inhabitants of the Southwest, in measuring the
movements of the Sun and Moon is evidenced not
only at Chaco Canyon but at a number of other sites.

(A) in measuring the movements of the Sun and
Moon is evidenced not only at
(B) in measuring the movements of the Sun and
Moon are evidenced not only at
(C) in measuring the movements of the Sun and
Moon is evidenced at not only
(D) to measure the movements of the Sun and Moon
is evidenced at not only
(E) to measure the movements of the Sun and Moon
are evidenced not only at

"Skill and precision" is one unit or not.
What would we prefer "is" or "are"
Top
Join the discussion
Log in to postLogin with Googleuse password
QUOTE IN REPLY
Legendary Member
Posts: 940
Joined: Tue Aug 26, 2008 3:22 amFollowed by: 1 member
Thanked: 55 times

by iamcste » Sat Nov 22, 2008 6:51 pm
gmat009 wrote:
iamcste wrote:
mals24 wrote:iamcste

Thanks for the reply. If you don't mind can you elaborate a bit more on this point.
if other word relates to the previous one
tide is related to time

Tide is nothing but period of time ( low tide and high tide)

so, you can see the other word " tide " is related to the previous one "time"

Carriage and horse form one unit
What do you think about this sentence............

The skill and the precision of the Anasazi, ancient
inhabitants of the Southwest, in measuring the
movements of the Sun and Moon is evidenced not
only at Chaco Canyon but at a number of other sites.

(A) in measuring the movements of the Sun and
Moon is evidenced not only at
(B) in measuring the movements of the Sun and
Moon are evidenced not only at
(C) in measuring the movements of the Sun and
Moon is evidenced at not only
(D) to measure the movements of the Sun and Moon
is evidenced at not only
(E) to measure the movements of the Sun and Moon
are evidenced not only at

"Skill and precision" is one unit or not.
What would we prefer "is" or "are"
"Is"

( albeit -also is missing)
Top
Join the discussion
Log in to postLogin with Googleuse password
QUOTE IN REPLY
Master | Next Rank: 500 Posts
Posts: 458
Joined: Sun Aug 31, 2008 10:44 amFollowed by: 1 member
Thanked: 3 times

by gmat009 » Sat Nov 22, 2008 7:37 pm
iamcste wrote:
gmat009 wrote:
iamcste wrote:
mals24 wrote:iamcste

Thanks for the reply. If you don't mind can you elaborate a bit more on this point.
if other word relates to the previous one
tide is related to time

Tide is nothing but period of time ( low tide and high tide)

so, you can see the other word " tide " is related to the previous one "time"

Carriage and horse form one unit
What do you think about this sentence............

The skill and the precision of the Anasazi, ancient
inhabitants of the Southwest, in measuring the
movements of the Sun and Moon is evidenced not
only at Chaco Canyon but at a number of other sites.

(A) in measuring the movements of the Sun and
Moon is evidenced not only at
(B) in measuring the movements of the Sun and
Moon are evidenced not only at
(C) in measuring the movements of the Sun and
Moon is evidenced at not only
(D) to measure the movements of the Sun and Moon
is evidenced at not only
(E) to measure the movements of the Sun and Moon
are evidenced not only at

"Skill and precision" is one unit or not.
What would we prefer "is" or "are"
"Is"

( albeit -also is missing)
Ans is "are"
Top
Join the discussion
Log in to postLogin with Googleuse password
QUOTE IN REPLY
Legendary Member
Posts: 683
Joined: Tue Jul 22, 2008 1:58 pmFollowed by: 2 members
Location: Dubai
Thanked: 73 times

by mals24 » Sun Nov 23, 2008 1:21 am
I think in GMATLAND if you see two items separated by 'and' just use the plural verb.

So I guess in GMATLAND the sentence will be

Time and tide WAIT for none.

Sheesh GMAT should make its own grammar books!!!
Top
Join the discussion
Log in to postLogin with Googleuse password
QUOTE IN REPLY
Legendary Member
Posts: 940
Joined: Tue Aug 26, 2008 3:22 amFollowed by: 1 member
Thanked: 55 times

by iamcste » Thu Dec 18, 2008 5:53 am
CITI29 wrote:The skill and the precision of the Anasazi, ancient
inhabitants of the Southwest, in measuring the
movements of the Sun and Moon is evidenced not
only at Chaco Canyon but at a number of other sites.

(A) in measuring the movements of the Sun and
Moon is evidenced not only at
(B) in measuring the movements of the Sun and
Moon are evidenced not only at
(C) in measuring the movements of the Sun and
Moon is evidenced at not only
(D) to measure the movements of the Sun and Moon
is evidenced at not only
(E) to measure the movements of the Sun and Moon
are evidenced not only at


source is 'gmat paper test'...ans is 'd'

https://www.beatthegmat.com/is-or-are-t13834.html

Top
Join the discussion
Log in to postLogin with Googleuse password
QUOTE IN REPLY
Legendary Member
Posts: 683
Joined: Tue Jul 22, 2008 1:58 pmFollowed by: 2 members
Location: Dubai
Thanked: 73 times

by mals24 » Thu Dec 18, 2008 6:10 am
source is 'gmat paper test'...ans is 'd'
okies the answer to the anasazi one is actually B.

check this out
https://www.beatthegmat.com/paper-test-e ... ht=anasazi
Top
Join the discussion
Log in to postLogin with Googleuse password
QUOTE IN REPLY
Legendary Member
Posts: 940
Joined: Tue Aug 26, 2008 3:22 amFollowed by: 1 member
Thanked: 55 times

by iamcste » Thu Dec 18, 2008 6:12 am
Same question, multiple ans..Gang let us sort this out....
Top
Join the discussion
Log in to postLogin with Googleuse password
QUOTE IN REPLY
Post new topic Locked