BREAKING: Target Test Prep releases Brand New 2026 On Demand GMAT prep course

Redeem

Target Test Prep · GMAT

Choose how you want to prepare

Learn live with an expert or move at your own pace. Every option includes the complete TTP study system.

★★★★★5.0563 reviews
Newsweek Readers’ Choice Awards 2026 winner: Target Test Prep, #1 Test Prep
NEWSWEEK READERS’ CHOICE AWARDS 2026

Target Test Prep was voted #1 Best Test Prep in the 2026 Newsweek Readers’ Choice™ Awards.

GMATLiveTeach Starts Oct 17
Chris Peckover, Target Test Prep GMAT expert
LIVE ONLINE CLASSES

Get Ready for GMAT Test Day Faster with Live Online Classes

with Chris Peckover, 100th-Percentile GMAT Scorer

Oct 17 · Chris Peckover
Sat · 11:00 AM to 2:00 PM ET
Oct 20 · Chris Peckover
Tue, Thu · 8:00 to 10:00 PM ET
Oct 25 · Josh Braslow
Sun · 1:00 to 4:00 PM ET
Included
40 hours of live online classes + 6 months of TTP OnDemand
  • Attend the first class for free
  • Every class is recorded, so you never fall behind
View classes & enroll
Limited seats availableTarget Test Prep
EALiveTeachOnDemand 5 seats left Start anytime
EXECUTIVE ASSESSMENT

Target Test Prep EA OnDemand

Self-paced EA prep. Study on your schedule.

Logan Thompson
EXECUTIVE ASSESSMENT

Sep 6 to Dec 6, 2026

with Logan Thompson

165+ EA score guarantee
$05-day trial no automatic billing
Schedule
Sun · 9:30 AM to 12:30 PM ET
Included
40 hours of live online classes plus six months of access to the complete TTP EA OnDemand course.
  • 165+ EA Score Guarantee
  • 4,100+ Quant, Verbal, and Integrated Reasoning practice questions
  • 400+ hours of in-depth video lessons
  • 3,000+ step-by-step video solutions
View EA class & enroll Start free 5-day trial
Limited cohort · enrollment openTrial includes full course accessTarget Test Prep
GMATOnDemand Start anytime
SELF-PACED MASTERCLASS

Target Test Prep GMAT OnDemand

Complete access from day one. Study on your schedule.

715+ score guarantee
$0to start then $127/mo
  • Personalized study plan and analytics
  • Thousands of lessons and practice questions

Compare the format, schedule, and included access before enrolling. Prices and seat counts shown reflect the supplied offer details.

In countries where automobile insurance includes

Expert replies
by BTGmoderatorDC » Tue Oct 30, 2018 6:15 pm

Timer

00:00

Answers

A

B

C

D

E

Stats

Difficulty—

In countries where automobile insurance includes compensation for whiplash injuries sustained in automobile accidents, reports of having suffered such injuries are twice as frequent as they are in countries where whiplash is not covered. Some commentators have argued, correctly, that since there is presently no objective test for whiplash, spurious reports of whiplash injuries cannot be readily identified. These commentators are, however, wrong to draw the further conclusion that in the countries with the higher rates of reported whiplash injuries, half of the reported cases are spurious: clearly, in countries where automobile insurance does not include compensation for whiplash, people often have little incentive to report whiplash injuries that they actually have suffered.

In the agreement given, the two boldfaced portions play which of the following roles?

(A) The first is evidence that has been used to support a conclusion that the argument criticizes; the second is that conclusion.

(B) The first is evidence that has been used to support a conclusion that the argument criticizes; the second is the position that the argument defends.

(C) The first is a claim that has been used to support a conclusion that the argument accepts; the second is the position that the argument defends.

(D) The first is an intermediate conclusion that has been used to support a conclusion that the argument defends; the second is the position that the argument opposes.

(E) The first presents a claim that is disputed in the argument; the second is the conclusion that has been drawn on the basis of that claim.

OA A

Source: GMAT Prep
Join the discussion
Source: — Critical Reasoning |

by ceilidh.erickson » Wed Oct 31, 2018 7:38 am
The goal in any BOLDFACE question is to deconstruct the argument, and determine the role of each statement:

- author's conclusion / position
- support for the author
- the counterpoint / what others believe
- support for the counterpoint
- neutral / background information


This particular argument presents a common structure for arguments in boldface questions: we have a phenomenon presented, and two explanations offered - the one that the author believes, and the one that the author opposes.

Phenomenon:
In countries where automobile insurances includes compensation for whiplash injuries sustained in automobile accidents, reports of having suffered such injuries are twice as frequent as they are in countries where whiplash is not covered.

Explanation 1 (not the author's):
Given: there is presently no objective test for whiplash, spurious reports of whiplash injuries cannot be readily identified,
Conclusion: half of the reported cases are spurious

Explanation 2 (the author's):
Hypothesis: in countries where automobile insurances does not include compensation for whiplash, people often have little incentive to report whiplash injuries that they actually have suffered,
Conclusion: These commentators are wrong to draw the further conclusion that half of the reported cases are spurious.

Now, we label the boldface portions according to this breakdown:

boldface 1: "there is presently no objective test for whiplash"
= a piece of evidence (a fact) that supports explanation 1, which the author does NOT believe


boldface 2: "in the countries with the higher rates of reported whiplash injuries, half of the reported cases are spurious"
= explanation 1, which the author does NOT believe


Tip for boldface questions: When looking at answer choices, just look at the 1st part first, and eliminate answers. Then look at the 2nd part of the answers that remain.

For the 1st part of each answer choice, we want: a piece of evidence (a fact) that supports explanation 1, which the author does NOT believe

(A) The first is evidence that has been used to support a conclusion that the argument criticizes...
- yes, this could work

(B) The first is evidence that has been used to support a conclusion that the argument criticizes...
- same as A. Keep it.

(C) The first is a claim that has been used to support a conclusion that the argument accepts...
- no, that would mean support for the author's side. Eliminate C.

(D) The first is an intermediate conclusion that has been used to support a conclusion that the argument defends...
- this isn't a conclusion; it's a fact. Eliminate D.

(E) The first presents a claim that is disputed in the argument...
- it's not a claim; it's a fact. Eliminate E.



We've eliminated C, D, and E. So we only have to look at the 2nd parts of A and B. We're looking for: explanation 1, which the author does NOT believe

(A) ...the second is that conclusion.
- yes, that fits. "That" conclusion = the conclusion that the argument criticizes.

(B) ...the second is the position that the argument defends.
- no, the 2nd is the opposing explanation, not the author's explanation.

The answer is A.
Ceilidh Erickson
EdM in Mind, Brain, and Education
Harvard Graduate School of Education
Join the discussion

by ceilidh.erickson » Wed Oct 31, 2018 7:43 am
By the way, it's interesting to note that the GMAT will sometimes use the same argument but ask different questions about it. Here is the same argument from the OG, but with different portions bolded: https://www.beatthegmat.com/gmat-offici ... tml#818265

If you want more on BOLDFACE questions in general, see:
https://www.beatthegmat.com/og-2018-cr- ... tml#796614
https://www.beatthegmat.com/gmat-offici ... tml#818059
https://www.beatthegmat.com/gmat-offici ... tml#818656
https://www.beatthegmat.com/although-th ... tml#821876
https://www.beatthegmat.com/scientists- ... tml#538772
https://www.manhattanprep.com/gmat/blog ... -question/
Ceilidh Erickson
EdM in Mind, Brain, and Education
Harvard Graduate School of Education
Join the discussion