BREAKING: Target Test Prep releases Brand New 2026 On Demand GMAT prep course

Redeem

Target Test Prep · GMAT

Choose how you want to prepare

Learn live with an expert or move at your own pace. Every option includes the complete TTP study system.

★★★★★5.0559 reviews
Vote for Target Test Prep, Newsweek Readers’ Choice Awards 2026
NEWSWEEK READERS’ CHOICE 2026

BIG NEWS! Target Test Prep has been nominated, and they’d love your vote!

TTP has worked incredibly hard to build the best test prep experience possible, and winning Newsweek’s 2026 Readers’ Choice Award for Best Test Prep would mean a lot to them. If TTP has helped you, they’d be incredibly grateful for your vote. You can vote once each day through September 9.

Vote for TTP
GMATLiveTeach 7 seats left
Chris Peckover
NEXT LIVE COHORT

Oct 13 to Jan 7, 2027

with Chris Peckover

Schedule
Tue, Thu · 8:00 to 10:00 PM ET
Included
40 live hours + 6 months of GMAT OnDemand
  • Live instruction and real-time questions
  • Class recordings and assigned practice
View class & enroll
Limited cohort · enrollment openTarget Test Prep
EALiveTeach 5 seats left
Logan Thompson
EXECUTIVE ASSESSMENT

Sep 6 to Dec 6, 2026

with Logan Thompson

Schedule
Sun · 9:30 AM to 12:30 PM ET
Included
40 hours of live online classes plus six months of access to the complete TTP EA OnDemand course.
  • 165+ EA Score Guarantee
  • 4,100+ Quant, Verbal, and Integrated Reasoning practice questions
  • 400+ hours of in-depth video lessons
  • 3,000+ step-by-step video solutions
View EA class & enroll
Limited cohort · enrollment openTarget Test Prep
GMATOnDemand Start anytime
SELF-PACED MASTERCLASS

Target Test Prep GMAT OnDemand

Complete access from day one. Study on your schedule.

715+ score guarantee
$0to start then $127/mo
  • Personalized study plan and analytics
  • Thousands of lessons and practice questions

Compare the format, schedule, and included access before enrolling. Prices and seat counts shown reflect the supplied offer details.

In countries where automobile insurance includes

Expert replies
by BTGmoderatorDC » Tue Oct 30, 2018 6:15 pm

Timer

00:00

Answers

A

B

C

D

E

Stats

Difficulty

In countries where automobile insurance includes compensation for whiplash injuries sustained in automobile accidents, reports of having suffered such injuries are twice as frequent as they are in countries where whiplash is not covered. Some commentators have argued, correctly, that since there is presently no objective test for whiplash, spurious reports of whiplash injuries cannot be readily identified. These commentators are, however, wrong to draw the further conclusion that in the countries with the higher rates of reported whiplash injuries, half of the reported cases are spurious: clearly, in countries where automobile insurance does not include compensation for whiplash, people often have little incentive to report whiplash injuries that they actually have suffered.

In the agreement given, the two boldfaced portions play which of the following roles?

(A) The first is evidence that has been used to support a conclusion that the argument criticizes; the second is that conclusion.

(B) The first is evidence that has been used to support a conclusion that the argument criticizes; the second is the position that the argument defends.

(C) The first is a claim that has been used to support a conclusion that the argument accepts; the second is the position that the argument defends.

(D) The first is an intermediate conclusion that has been used to support a conclusion that the argument defends; the second is the position that the argument opposes.

(E) The first presents a claim that is disputed in the argument; the second is the conclusion that has been drawn on the basis of that claim.

OA A

Source: GMAT Prep
Join the discussion
Source: — Critical Reasoning |

by ceilidh.erickson » Wed Oct 31, 2018 7:38 am
The goal in any BOLDFACE question is to deconstruct the argument, and determine the role of each statement:

- author's conclusion / position
- support for the author
- the counterpoint / what others believe
- support for the counterpoint
- neutral / background information


This particular argument presents a common structure for arguments in boldface questions: we have a phenomenon presented, and two explanations offered - the one that the author believes, and the one that the author opposes.

Phenomenon:
In countries where automobile insurances includes compensation for whiplash injuries sustained in automobile accidents, reports of having suffered such injuries are twice as frequent as they are in countries where whiplash is not covered.

Explanation 1 (not the author's):
Given: there is presently no objective test for whiplash, spurious reports of whiplash injuries cannot be readily identified,
Conclusion: half of the reported cases are spurious

Explanation 2 (the author's):
Hypothesis: in countries where automobile insurances does not include compensation for whiplash, people often have little incentive to report whiplash injuries that they actually have suffered,
Conclusion: These commentators are wrong to draw the further conclusion that half of the reported cases are spurious.

Now, we label the boldface portions according to this breakdown:

boldface 1: "there is presently no objective test for whiplash"
= a piece of evidence (a fact) that supports explanation 1, which the author does NOT believe


boldface 2: "in the countries with the higher rates of reported whiplash injuries, half of the reported cases are spurious"
= explanation 1, which the author does NOT believe


Tip for boldface questions: When looking at answer choices, just look at the 1st part first, and eliminate answers. Then look at the 2nd part of the answers that remain.

For the 1st part of each answer choice, we want: a piece of evidence (a fact) that supports explanation 1, which the author does NOT believe

(A) The first is evidence that has been used to support a conclusion that the argument criticizes...
- yes, this could work

(B) The first is evidence that has been used to support a conclusion that the argument criticizes...
- same as A. Keep it.

(C) The first is a claim that has been used to support a conclusion that the argument accepts...
- no, that would mean support for the author's side. Eliminate C.

(D) The first is an intermediate conclusion that has been used to support a conclusion that the argument defends...
- this isn't a conclusion; it's a fact. Eliminate D.

(E) The first presents a claim that is disputed in the argument...
- it's not a claim; it's a fact. Eliminate E.



We've eliminated C, D, and E. So we only have to look at the 2nd parts of A and B. We're looking for: explanation 1, which the author does NOT believe

(A) ...the second is that conclusion.
- yes, that fits. "That" conclusion = the conclusion that the argument criticizes.

(B) ...the second is the position that the argument defends.
- no, the 2nd is the opposing explanation, not the author's explanation.

The answer is A.
Ceilidh Erickson
EdM in Mind, Brain, and Education
Harvard Graduate School of Education
Join the discussion

by ceilidh.erickson » Wed Oct 31, 2018 7:43 am
By the way, it's interesting to note that the GMAT will sometimes use the same argument but ask different questions about it. Here is the same argument from the OG, but with different portions bolded: https://www.beatthegmat.com/gmat-offici ... tml#818265

If you want more on BOLDFACE questions in general, see:
https://www.beatthegmat.com/og-2018-cr- ... tml#796614
https://www.beatthegmat.com/gmat-offici ... tml#818059
https://www.beatthegmat.com/gmat-offici ... tml#818656
https://www.beatthegmat.com/although-th ... tml#821876
https://www.beatthegmat.com/scientists- ... tml#538772
https://www.manhattanprep.com/gmat/blog ... -question/
Ceilidh Erickson
EdM in Mind, Brain, and Education
Harvard Graduate School of Education
Join the discussion