BREAKING: Target Test Prep releases Brand New 2026 On Demand GMAT prep course

Redeem

Target Test Prep · GMAT

Choose how you want to prepare

Learn live with an expert or move at your own pace. Every option includes the complete TTP study system.

★★★★★5.0559 reviews
Vote for Target Test Prep, Newsweek Readers’ Choice Awards 2026
NEWSWEEK READERS’ CHOICE 2026

BIG NEWS! Target Test Prep has been nominated, and they’d love your vote!

TTP has worked incredibly hard to build the best test prep experience possible, and winning Newsweek’s 2026 Readers’ Choice Award for Best Test Prep would mean a lot to them. If TTP has helped you, they’d be incredibly grateful for your vote. You can vote once each day through September 9.

Vote for TTP
GMATLiveTeach 7 seats left
Chris Peckover
NEXT LIVE COHORT

Oct 13 to Jan 7, 2027

with Chris Peckover

Schedule
Tue, Thu · 8:00 to 10:00 PM ET
Included
40 live hours + 6 months of GMAT OnDemand
  • Live instruction and real-time questions
  • Class recordings and assigned practice
View class & enroll
Limited cohort · enrollment openTarget Test Prep
EALiveTeach 5 seats left
Logan Thompson
EXECUTIVE ASSESSMENT

Sep 6 to Dec 6, 2026

with Logan Thompson

Schedule
Sun · 9:30 AM to 12:30 PM ET
Included
40 hours of live online classes plus six months of access to the complete TTP EA OnDemand course.
  • 165+ EA Score Guarantee
  • 4,100+ Quant, Verbal, and Integrated Reasoning practice questions
  • 400+ hours of in-depth video lessons
  • 3,000+ step-by-step video solutions
View EA class & enroll
Limited cohort · enrollment openTarget Test Prep
GMATOnDemand Start anytime
SELF-PACED MASTERCLASS

Target Test Prep GMAT OnDemand

Complete access from day one. Study on your schedule.

715+ score guarantee
$0to start then $127/mo
  • Personalized study plan and analytics
  • Thousands of lessons and practice questions

Compare the format, schedule, and included access before enrolling. Prices and seat counts shown reflect the supplied offer details.

GMAT Official Guide 2019 Boreal owls range over a much

Expert replies
by BTGmoderatorDC » Mon Aug 06, 2018 3:26 pm

Timer

00:00

Answers

A

B

C

D

E

Stats

Difficulty

Boreal owls range over a much larger area than do other owls of similar size. Scientists have hypothesized that it is scarcity of prey that leads the owls to range so widely. This hypothesis would be hard to confirm directly, since it is not possible to produce a sufficiently accurate count of the populations of small mammals inhabiting the forests where boreal owls live. Careful study of owl behavior has, however, shown that boreal owls do range over larger areas when they live in regions where food of the sort eaten by small mammals is comparatively sparse. This indicates that the scientists' hypothesis is not sheer speculation.

In the argument given, the two boldfaced portions play which of the following roles?

A. The first presents an explanatory hypothesis; the second states the main conclusion of the argument.
B. The first presents an explanatory hypothesis; the second presents evidence tending to support this hypothesis.
C. The first presents an explanatory hypothesis; the second presents evidence to support an alternative explanation.
D. The first describes a position that the argument opposes; the second presents evidence to undermine the support for the position being opposed.
E. The first describes a position that the argument opposes; the second states the main conclusion of the argument.

B
Join the discussion
Source: — Critical Reasoning |

by ceilidh.erickson » Tue Aug 07, 2018 10:25 am
With BOLDFACE questions in CR, you need to determine the following:

- what is the author's position? (or someone else's position presented by the author)?
- what is given in support of that position?
- are there opposing viewpoints presented?
- is each statement and OPINION or a FACT?


Then for each of the bolded statements, label the role that it's playing. Let's break down the argument, statement by statement:

1. Boreal owls range over a much larger area than do other owls of similar size. --> Fact that scientists will seek to explain.
2. Scientists have hypothesized that it is scarcity of prey that leads the owls to range so widely. --> The scientists' position/conclusion (opinion)
3. This hypothesis would be hard to confirm directly, since it is not possible to produce a sufficiently accurate count of the populations of small mammals inhabiting the forests where boreal owls live. --> Fact that weighs against the scientists' position.
4. Careful study of owl behavior has, however, shown that boreal owls do range over larger areas when they live in regions where food of the sort eaten by small mammals is comparatively sparse. --> Fact that supports the scientists' position about range & food scarcity.
5. This indicates that the scientists' hypothesis is not sheer speculation. --> the author states that there is merit to the scientists' position.

Sentences 2 and 4 are the bolded ones in this case, so when looking at the answer choices, we're looking for:
boldface 1: The scientists' position/conclusion (opinion)
boldface 2: Fact that supports the scientists' position about range & food scarcity.


Tip for boldface questions: Just look at the 1st part first, and eliminate answers. Then look at the 2nd part.

For the 1st part of each answer choice, we want: The scientists' position/conclusion (opinion)

A. The first presents an explanatory hypothesis... --> yes, hypothesis = position/conclusion.
B. The first presents an explanatory hypothesis... --> yes, same
C. The first presents an explanatory hypothesis... --> yes, same
D. The first describes a position that the argument opposes... --> no, the argument does not oppose this position.
E. The first describes a position that the argument opposes... --> no, same

We can eliminate D and E, and just look at the 2nd part of A, B, and C. We're looking for: Fact that supports the scientists' position about range & food scarcity.

A. ... the second states the main conclusion of the argument. --> no, it's a FACT, not a conclusion
B. ... the second presents evidence tending to support this hypothesis. yes, evidence = fact, and it's supporting the earlier position.
C. ... the second presents evidence to support an alternative explanation. --> no, there is no alternative explanation. The author agrees with the merits of the scientists' explanation.

The answer is B.
Ceilidh Erickson
EdM in Mind, Brain, and Education
Harvard Graduate School of Education
Join the discussion