• NEW! FREE Beat The GMAT Quizzes
Hundreds of Questions Highly Detailed Reporting Expert Explanations
• 7 CATs FREE!
If you earn 100 Forum Points

Engage in the Beat The GMAT forums to earn
100 points for $49 worth of Veritas practice GMATs FREE VERITAS PRACTICE GMAT EXAMS Earn 10 Points Per Post Earn 10 Points Per Thanks Earn 10 Points Per Upvote ## GMAT Official Guide 2019 In countries where automobile tagged by: BTGmoderatorDC ##### This topic has 1 expert reply and 0 member replies ### Top Member ## GMAT Official Guide 2019 In countries where automobile ## Timer 00:00 ## Your Answer A B C D E ## Global Stats Difficult In countries where automobile insurance includes compensation for whiplash injuries sustained in automobile accidents, reports of having suffered such injuries are twice as frequent as they are in countries where whiplash is not covered. Presently; no objective test for whiplash exists, so it is true that spurious reports of whiplash injuries cannot be readily identified. Nevertheless, these facts do not warrant the conclusion drawn by some commentators that in the countries with the higher rates of reported whiplash injuries, half of the reported cases are spurious. Clearly, in countries where automobile insurance does not include compensation for whiplash, people often have little incentive to report whiplash injuries that they actually have suffered. In the argument given, the two boldfaced portions play which of the following roles? A) The first is a claim that the argument disputes; the second is a conclusion that has been based on that claim. B) The first is a claim that has been used to support a conclusion that the argument accepts; the second is that conclusion. C) The first is evidence that has been used to support a conclusion for which the argument provides further evidence; the second is the main conclusion of the argument. D) The first is a finding whose implications are at issue in the argument; the second is a claim presented in order to argue against deriving certain implications from that finding. E) The first is a finding whose accuracy is evaluated in the argument; the second is evidence presented to establish that the finding is accurate. D ### GMAT/MBA Expert GMAT Instructor Joined 04 Dec 2012 Posted: 2047 messages Followed by: 238 members Upvotes: 1443 Top Reply The goal in any BOLDFACE question is to deconstruct the argument, and determine the role of each statement: - author's conclusion / position - support for the author - the counterpoint / what others believe - support for the counterpoint - neutral / background information This whiplash argument is a common argument structure for boldface questions: we have a phenomenon presented, and two explanations offered: the one the author believes, and the opposite. Phenomenon: In countries where automobile insurances includes compensation for whiplash injuries sustained in automobile accidents, reports of having suffered such injuries are twice as frequent as they are in countries where whiplash is not covered. Explanation 1 (not the author's): Given: there is presently no objective test for whiplash, spurious reports of whiplash injuries cannot be readily identified, Conclusion: half of the reported cases are spurious Explanation 2 (the author's): Hypothesis: in countries where automobile insurances does not include compensation for whiplash, people often have little incentive to report whiplash injuries that they actually have suffered, Conclusion: These commentators are wrong to draw the further conclusion that half of the reported cases are spurious . Boldface 1 = the phenomenon that both explanations are seeking to explain. Boldface 2 = the hypothesis given by the author to explain the phenomenon, supporting the larger conclusion that the other explanation is wrong. Tip for boldface questions: When looking at answer choices, just look at the 1st part first, and eliminate answers. Then look at the 2nd part of the answers that remain. For the 1st part of each answer choice, we want: the phenomenon that both explanations are seeking to explain (fact). A) The first is a claim that the argument disputes... --> no. It's not a claim, it's a fact. B) The first is a claim that has been used to support a conclusion that the argument accepts... --> no. It's not a claim, it's a fact. C) The first is evidence that has been used to support a conclusion for which the argument provides further evidence... --> maybe?. You *could* argue that this phenomenon is evidence for other people's viewpoint... it's not a great answer, but we'll leave it for now. D) The first is a finding whose implications are at issue in the argument... --> yes. That means a fact that we're not sure how to interpret. E) The first is a finding whose accuracy is evaluated in the argument... --> no. We're not disputing the accuracy of differences in whiplash compensation. We're disputing *why* that's the case. Eliminate A, B, and E. Now look at the 2nd part of C and D. We're looking for: the hypothesis given by the author to explain the phenomenon, supporting the larger conclusion that the other explanation is wrong. C) ... the second is the main conclusion of the argument. --> no. It's supporting a larger conclusion, so it's not the main conclusion. (Plus the 1st part was iffy). D) ... the second is a claim presented in order to argue against deriving certain implications from that finding. --> yes. Yes! This statement is supporting the broader idea "don't believe what those other people think." The answer is D. _________________ Ceilidh Erickson Manhattan Prep GMAT & GRE instructor EdM in Mind, Brain, and Education Harvard Graduate School of Education Manhattan Prep instructors all have 99th+ percentile scores and expert teaching experience. Sign up for a FREE TRIAL, and learn why we have the highest ratings in the GMAT industry! Free Manhattan Prep online events - The first class of every online Manhattan Prep course is free. Classes start every week. • Award-winning private GMAT tutoring Register now and save up to$200

Available with Beat the GMAT members only code

• Free Practice Test & Review
How would you score if you took the GMAT

Available with Beat the GMAT members only code

• Free Veritas GMAT Class
Experience Lesson 1 Live Free

Available with Beat the GMAT members only code

• Get 300+ Practice Questions

Available with Beat the GMAT members only code

• 5-Day Free Trial
5-day free, full-access trial TTP Quant

Available with Beat the GMAT members only code

• FREE GMAT Exam
Know how you'd score today for \$0

Available with Beat the GMAT members only code

• 5 Day FREE Trial
Study Smarter, Not Harder

Available with Beat the GMAT members only code

• Magoosh
Study with Magoosh GMAT prep

Available with Beat the GMAT members only code

• Free Trial & Practice Exam
BEAT THE GMAT EXCLUSIVE

Available with Beat the GMAT members only code

• 1 Hour Free
BEAT THE GMAT EXCLUSIVE

Available with Beat the GMAT members only code

### Top First Responders*

1 Jay@ManhattanReview 71 first replies
2 Brent@GMATPrepNow 67 first replies
3 GMATGuruNY 43 first replies
4 Ian Stewart 27 first replies
5 Scott@TargetTestPrep 18 first replies
* Only counts replies to topics started in last 30 days
See More Top Beat The GMAT Members

### Most Active Experts

1 Scott@TargetTestPrep

Target Test Prep

221 posts
2 Max@Math Revolution

Math Revolution

93 posts
3 Brent@GMATPrepNow

GMAT Prep Now Teacher

90 posts
4 Jay@ManhattanReview

Manhattan Review

73 posts
5 GMATGuruNY

The Princeton Review Teacher

66 posts
See More Top Beat The GMAT Experts