BREAKING: Target Test Prep releases Brand New 2026 On Demand GMAT prep course

Redeem

Target Test Prep · GMAT

Choose how you want to prepare

Learn live with an expert or move at your own pace. Every option includes the complete TTP study system.

★★★★★5.0563 reviews
Newsweek Readers’ Choice Awards 2026 winner: Target Test Prep, #1 Test Prep
NEWSWEEK READERS’ CHOICE AWARDS 2026

Target Test Prep was voted #1 Best Test Prep in the 2026 Newsweek Readers’ Choice™ Awards.

GMATLiveTeach Starts Oct 17
Chris Peckover, Target Test Prep GMAT expert
LIVE ONLINE CLASSES

Get Ready for GMAT Test Day Faster with Live Online Classes

with Chris Peckover, 100th-Percentile GMAT Scorer

Oct 17 · Chris Peckover
Sat · 11:00 AM to 2:00 PM ET
Oct 20 · Chris Peckover
Tue, Thu · 8:00 to 10:00 PM ET
Oct 25 · Josh Braslow
Sun · 1:00 to 4:00 PM ET
Included
40 hours of live online classes + 6 months of TTP OnDemand
  • Attend the first class for free
  • Every class is recorded, so you never fall behind
View classes & enroll
Limited seats availableTarget Test Prep
EALiveTeachOnDemand 5 seats left Start anytime
EXECUTIVE ASSESSMENT

Target Test Prep EA OnDemand

Self-paced EA prep. Study on your schedule.

Logan Thompson
EXECUTIVE ASSESSMENT

Sep 6 to Dec 6, 2026

with Logan Thompson

165+ EA score guarantee
$05-day trial no automatic billing
Schedule
Sun · 9:30 AM to 12:30 PM ET
Included
40 hours of live online classes plus six months of access to the complete TTP EA OnDemand course.
  • 165+ EA Score Guarantee
  • 4,100+ Quant, Verbal, and Integrated Reasoning practice questions
  • 400+ hours of in-depth video lessons
  • 3,000+ step-by-step video solutions
View EA class & enroll Start free 5-day trial
Limited cohort · enrollment openTrial includes full course accessTarget Test Prep
GMATOnDemand Start anytime
SELF-PACED MASTERCLASS

Target Test Prep GMAT OnDemand

Complete access from day one. Study on your schedule.

715+ score guarantee
$0to start then $127/mo
  • Personalized study plan and analytics
  • Thousands of lessons and practice questions

Compare the format, schedule, and included access before enrolling. Prices and seat counts shown reflect the supplied offer details.

GMAT PREP CR40

Expert replies
by poonam1279 » Sun Dec 07, 2008 12:36 pm
Need help with this CR
You do not have the required permissions to view the files attached to this post.
Join the discussion
Source: — Critical Reasoning |

by acecoolan » Sun Dec 07, 2008 7:11 pm
This one seems Evil.

IMO B though not sure
Join the discussion

by cramya » Sun Dec 07, 2008 7:31 pm
I would go with C)

The argument is more three trailer trucks should be employed.

C) says that most accidents have been between trucks and other vehicles. So by increasing the three trailers trucks there is no guarantee that the accidents will reduce.
Join the discussion

by ronniecoleman » Mon Dec 08, 2008 1:26 am
IMO B
Admission champion, Hauz khaz
011-27565856
Join the discussion

by vishubn » Mon Dec 08, 2008 2:25 am
One more for B !!

between trucks can be any two trucks !!

more experienced drivng the single and double trailer can decrease the accidents !!

vishu
KILL !! DIE !! or BEAT my FEAR !!! de@D END!!
Join the discussion

by niraj_a » Mon Dec 08, 2008 5:25 am
B

argument asserts that trucks are safer. B says its the driver who is safe, not the truck. weakening achieved.
Join the discussion

by orel » Mon Dec 08, 2008 6:59 am
another vote for B
Join the discussion

by gl750raj » Mon Dec 08, 2008 7:37 am
B is the answer as it puts the 'cause' and 'effect' in the right perspective and the other way around to seriously weaken the inference quoted from the argument.
Attitude is everything!
Join the discussion

by parallel_chase » Mon Dec 08, 2008 9:10 am
I dont know why you guys think B should be answer.

B is actually in forms is strengthening the argument.

More experienced drivers - better driving

Accidents are caused either by drivers or due to weather conditions. If there is no weather involvement, it means triple trailer trucks would be safer.

The argument says larger trucks i.e. triple trailer trucks cause less number of accidents as compared with single or double ones.

Conclusion: triple trailer trucks should be used to reduce the number of highway deaths.

Lets see other options.

A) - smaller roads restrict large trucks - if roads cannot permit large trucks then companies will be forced to use single or double trailers - ANSWER IMO


B) Check the above reasoning

C) - few collisions are between trucks - out of scope - we are talking about deaths in general

D) - this could be the answer, had it mentioned specific information about single or double trailers

E) - this also strengthens the argument - highest load of the single trailer would still be less than the lowest load of the triple trailer.


OA?

Kindly post the OA with spoiler tags
No rest for the Wicked....
Join the discussion

by vivek.kapoor83 » Mon Dec 08, 2008 10:07 am
parallel chase,
suppose you have 100 drivers who drive large trucks and if u have more large trucks, ur small truck drivers will not be able to drive as they are not xprienced.So, more accidents and B weakn the argument. So, IMO B.
Join the discussion

by scoobydooby » Mon Dec 08, 2008 10:19 am
may be the drivers of the very large trucks are very experienced which is why they cause less accidents. so if the use of large trucks large increases, road accidents would decrease. this would support the plan and not weaken it
Join the discussion

by karmayogi » Mon Dec 08, 2008 10:19 am
IMO B.

My reasoning is same as Vivek's.

You can't increase the number of the best drivers in a country. If you increase the number of triple trailer trucks then many low quality drivers will shift to triple trailer trucks, and that could increase the number of accidents. Also, the option shows that problem is not trucks but something else.

OA plz? It's a very good question; I would like to see the answer and official explanation also.
Each soul is potentially divine. The goal is to manifest this divine within.
--By Swami Vivekananda
Join the discussion

by parallel_chase » Mon Dec 08, 2008 10:33 am
vivek.kapoor83 wrote:parallel chase,
suppose you have 100 drivers who drive large trucks and if u have more large trucks, ur small truck drivers will not be able to drive as they are not xprienced.So, more accidents and B weakn the argument. So, IMO B.
there are 2 assumptions in your reasoning

1) the number of small truck drivers are same as large truck drivers

2) small truck drivers wont be given special training to drive the large truck drivers.

Now, there must be some reason why large trucks are driven by the best drivers ~ safe drivers

any thoughts.
Last edited by parallel_chase on Mon Dec 08, 2008 10:46 am, edited 1 time in total.
No rest for the Wicked....
Join the discussion

by niraj_a » Mon Dec 08, 2008 10:45 am
care to post the OA poonam?
Join the discussion

by niraj_a » Mon Dec 08, 2008 6:04 pm
i agree with PC, changing my answer to A now.
Join the discussion