BREAKING: Target Test Prep releases Brand New 2026 On Demand GMAT prep course
Redeem
Featured Course
Target Test Prep GMAT OnDemand
Scott Woodbury-Stewart’s private virtual classroom — 400 hours of master-class video lessons for the GMAT Focus Edition.
- 715+ score guarantee — highest in the industry (99th percentile)
- 52 chapters · 1,500+ lessons · 4,000+ practice questions
- 400 hours of video · 1,500+ instructor-led HD smartboard lessons
- 300,000+ students accepted to Harvard, Stanford, Wharton, Booth & Sloan & more
- 24/7 live support + weekly Zoom office hours with GMAT instructors
- TTP AI Assist — 24/7 AI-powered virtual tutor for instant help
- 1,200+ flashcards + AI-powered study assistant & daily calendar
- OnDemand, LiveTeach & GMAT Bootcamp formats available
- Also: GRE, SAT Math & Executive Assessment courses
- MBA Admissions Consulting now available
- 🏆 2025 EdTech Breakthrough Award: Test Prep Solution Provider of the Year
- 200,000+ students served
- 5-day free trial — $0 to start, no auto-billing, cancel anytime
★★★★★
5.0
(559 reviews)
130-pt guarantee
$0 to start
then $127/mo
GMAT PREP CR40
It can't be A as A only refers to large trucks and not the 3 trailer ones. I would go with B - what's the OA ?
Parallel chase - Just a clarification - are u not assuming that the place has only small roads?A) - smaller roads restrict large trucks - if roads cannot permit large trucks then companies will be forced to use single or double trailers - ANSWER IMO
What if the large trucks can use bigger roads to ship the materials?
we dont know if smaller roads will completely prohibit the usage of large trucks..fair?
IMO, B.
Absolutely correct. I am somehow lacking in CR. Need to hit the books again to get the logic straight.raajan_p wrote:Parallel chase - Just a clarification - are u not assuming that the place has only small roads?A) - smaller roads restrict large trucks - if roads cannot permit large trucks then companies will be forced to use single or double trailers - ANSWER IMO
What if the large trucks can use bigger roads to ship the materials?
we dont know if smaller roads will completely prohibit the usage of large trucks..fair?
IMO, B.
No rest for the Wicked....
You just cant lie more...you are one of those folks keeping this forum, alive.parallel_chase wrote:Absolutely correct. I am somehow lacking in CR. Need to hit the books again to get the logic straight.raajan_p wrote:Parallel chase - Just a clarification - are u not assuming that the place has only small roads?A) - smaller roads restrict large trucks - if roads cannot permit large trucks then companies will be forced to use single or double trailers - ANSWER IMO
What if the large trucks can use bigger roads to ship the materials?
we dont know if smaller roads will completely prohibit the usage of large trucks..fair?
IMO, B.
B
it shows that the accidents are dependent on drivers
the reason why accidents for 3 trailer trucks was less was because they were driven by better drivers..
increase in 3 trailer trucks can cause increase in accidents as they might be driven by less exp ( 2 or 1 trailer truck drivers )
it shows that the accidents are dependent on drivers
the reason why accidents for 3 trailer trucks was less was because they were driven by better drivers..
increase in 3 trailer trucks can cause increase in accidents as they might be driven by less exp ( 2 or 1 trailer truck drivers )
IMO C. The reason is it merely introduces a new variable for the reason of accident rate. What if the other vehicle which was present in all the accident was the cause?
The assumption in the argument is accident rate is lower for three trailer trucks. But it never states the reason.
To me B actually strengthens the argument. Because it is consistent with the reasoning that lower accident rate is because best drivers are driving the three trailer vehicles.
Answer C totally does not need an ASSUMPTION.
The assumption in the argument is accident rate is lower for three trailer trucks. But it never states the reason.
To me B actually strengthens the argument. Because it is consistent with the reasoning that lower accident rate is because best drivers are driving the three trailer vehicles.
Answer C totally does not need an ASSUMPTION.
