GMAT PREP CR40
-
- Master | Next Rank: 500 Posts
- Posts: 145
- Joined: Thu Nov 13, 2008 7:18 am
- Location: United Kingdom
- Thanked: 5 times
-
- Master | Next Rank: 500 Posts
- Posts: 145
- Joined: Thu Nov 13, 2008 7:18 am
- Location: United Kingdom
- Thanked: 5 times
-
- Senior | Next Rank: 100 Posts
- Posts: 75
- Joined: Wed Aug 27, 2008 7:19 am
- Location: Orlando
- Thanked: 6 times
Parallel chase - Just a clarification - are u not assuming that the place has only small roads?A) - smaller roads restrict large trucks - if roads cannot permit large trucks then companies will be forced to use single or double trailers - ANSWER IMO
What if the large trucks can use bigger roads to ship the materials?
we dont know if smaller roads will completely prohibit the usage of large trucks..fair?
IMO, B.
-
- Legendary Member
- Posts: 1153
- Joined: Wed Jun 20, 2007 6:21 am
- Thanked: 146 times
- Followed by:2 members
Absolutely correct. I am somehow lacking in CR. Need to hit the books again to get the logic straight.raajan_p wrote:Parallel chase - Just a clarification - are u not assuming that the place has only small roads?A) - smaller roads restrict large trucks - if roads cannot permit large trucks then companies will be forced to use single or double trailers - ANSWER IMO
What if the large trucks can use bigger roads to ship the materials?
we dont know if smaller roads will completely prohibit the usage of large trucks..fair?
IMO, B.
No rest for the Wicked....
-
- Senior | Next Rank: 100 Posts
- Posts: 75
- Joined: Wed Aug 27, 2008 7:19 am
- Location: Orlando
- Thanked: 6 times
You just cant lie more...you are one of those folks keeping this forum, alive.parallel_chase wrote:Absolutely correct. I am somehow lacking in CR. Need to hit the books again to get the logic straight.raajan_p wrote:Parallel chase - Just a clarification - are u not assuming that the place has only small roads?A) - smaller roads restrict large trucks - if roads cannot permit large trucks then companies will be forced to use single or double trailers - ANSWER IMO
What if the large trucks can use bigger roads to ship the materials?
we dont know if smaller roads will completely prohibit the usage of large trucks..fair?
IMO, B.
-
- Legendary Member
- Posts: 594
- Joined: Thu Aug 14, 2008 11:51 pm
- Thanked: 12 times
B
it shows that the accidents are dependent on drivers
the reason why accidents for 3 trailer trucks was less was because they were driven by better drivers..
increase in 3 trailer trucks can cause increase in accidents as they might be driven by less exp ( 2 or 1 trailer truck drivers )
it shows that the accidents are dependent on drivers
the reason why accidents for 3 trailer trucks was less was because they were driven by better drivers..
increase in 3 trailer trucks can cause increase in accidents as they might be driven by less exp ( 2 or 1 trailer truck drivers )
-
- Senior | Next Rank: 100 Posts
- Posts: 58
- Joined: Sun Jun 17, 2007 8:24 am
IMO C. The reason is it merely introduces a new variable for the reason of accident rate. What if the other vehicle which was present in all the accident was the cause?
The assumption in the argument is accident rate is lower for three trailer trucks. But it never states the reason.
To me B actually strengthens the argument. Because it is consistent with the reasoning that lower accident rate is because best drivers are driving the three trailer vehicles.
Answer C totally does not need an ASSUMPTION.
The assumption in the argument is accident rate is lower for three trailer trucks. But it never states the reason.
To me B actually strengthens the argument. Because it is consistent with the reasoning that lower accident rate is because best drivers are driving the three trailer vehicles.
Answer C totally does not need an ASSUMPTION.
-
- Master | Next Rank: 500 Posts
- Posts: 100
- Joined: Tue Aug 05, 2014 4:32 am