Live GMAT classes with Target Test Prep start Nov 21 and Nov 22. First class free.

See classes
Target Test Prep · GMAT

Choose how you want to prepare

Learn live with an expert or move at your own pace. Every option includes the complete TTP study system.

Newsweek Readers’ Choice Awards 2026 winner: Target Test Prep, #1 Test Prep

Target Test Prep was voted #1 Best Test Prep in the 2026 Newsweek Readers’ Choice™ Awards.

★★★★★5.0563 reviews
GMATLiveTeachStarts Nov 22
Josh Braslow, Target Test Prep GMAT expert
LIVE ONLINE CLASSES

Get Ready for GMAT Test Day Faster with Live Online Classes

with Josh Braslow, 20+ years in test prep

Nov 22 · Josh Braslow
Sun · 9:30 AM to 12:30 PM ET
Included
40 hours of live online classes + 6 months of TTP OnDemand
  • Attend the first class for free
  • Every class is recorded, so you never fall behind
View classes & enroll
Limited seats availableTarget Test Prep
EALiveTeachOnDemandStart anytime
EXECUTIVE ASSESSMENT

Target Test Prep EA OnDemand

Self-paced EA prep. Study on your schedule.

EXECUTIVE ASSESSMENT

with

165+ EA score guarantee
$05-day trial no automatic billing
Schedule
Included
40 hours of live online classes plus six months of access to the complete TTP EA OnDemand course.
  • 165+ EA Score Guarantee
  • 4,100+ Quant, Verbal, and Integrated Reasoning practice questions
  • 400+ hours of in-depth video lessons
  • 3,000+ step-by-step video solutions
View EA class & enroll Start free 5-day trial
Limited cohort · enrollment openTrial includes full course accessTarget Test Prep
GMATOnDemandStart anytime
SELF-PACED MASTERCLASS

Target Test Prep GMAT OnDemand

Complete access from day one. Study on your schedule.

715+ score guarantee
$0to start then $127/mo
  • Personalized study plan and analytics
  • Thousands of lessons and practice questions

GMAT PREP CR40

Expert replies

by cramya » Mon Dec 08, 2008 6:24 pm
Kindly post OA's using spoiler when posting the question please
Join the discussion

by pbanavara » Mon Dec 08, 2008 8:10 pm
It can't be A as A only refers to large trucks and not the 3 trailer ones. I would go with B - what's the OA ?
Join the discussion

by poonam1279 » Tue Dec 09, 2008 2:16 am
Sorry for the delay. OA will be posted tomorrow as I dont have access to it now.
Join the discussion

by poonam1279 » Wed Dec 10, 2008 2:28 am
OA is B
Thanks for all your explanations
Join the discussion

by raajan_p » Wed Dec 10, 2008 12:56 pm
A) - smaller roads restrict large trucks - if roads cannot permit large trucks then companies will be forced to use single or double trailers - ANSWER IMO
Parallel chase - Just a clarification - are u not assuming that the place has only small roads?

What if the large trucks can use bigger roads to ship the materials?

we dont know if smaller roads will completely prohibit the usage of large trucks..fair?

IMO, B.
Join the discussion

by parallel_chase » Wed Dec 10, 2008 12:58 pm
raajan_p wrote:
A) - smaller roads restrict large trucks - if roads cannot permit large trucks then companies will be forced to use single or double trailers - ANSWER IMO
Parallel chase - Just a clarification - are u not assuming that the place has only small roads?

What if the large trucks can use bigger roads to ship the materials?

we dont know if smaller roads will completely prohibit the usage of large trucks..fair?

IMO, B.
Absolutely correct. I am somehow lacking in CR. Need to hit the books again to get the logic straight.
No rest for the Wicked....
Join the discussion

by raajan_p » Wed Dec 10, 2008 1:46 pm
parallel_chase wrote:
raajan_p wrote:
A) - smaller roads restrict large trucks - if roads cannot permit large trucks then companies will be forced to use single or double trailers - ANSWER IMO
Parallel chase - Just a clarification - are u not assuming that the place has only small roads?

What if the large trucks can use bigger roads to ship the materials?

we dont know if smaller roads will completely prohibit the usage of large trucks..fair?

IMO, B.
Absolutely correct. I am somehow lacking in CR. Need to hit the books again to get the logic straight.
You just cant lie more...you are one of those folks keeping this forum, alive.
Join the discussion

by nervesofsteel » Sun Dec 14, 2008 11:15 am
B

it shows that the accidents are dependent on drivers

the reason why accidents for 3 trailer trucks was less was because they were driven by better drivers..
increase in 3 trailer trucks can cause increase in accidents as they might be driven by less exp ( 2 or 1 trailer truck drivers )
Join the discussion

by vish150783 » Mon Dec 15, 2008 8:29 am
IMO C. The reason is it merely introduces a new variable for the reason of accident rate. What if the other vehicle which was present in all the accident was the cause?

The assumption in the argument is accident rate is lower for three trailer trucks. But it never states the reason.

To me B actually strengthens the argument. Because it is consistent with the reasoning that lower accident rate is because best drivers are driving the three trailer vehicles.

Answer C totally does not need an ASSUMPTION.
Join the discussion

by ashley.com » Fri May 13, 2016 2:22 am
B seems to be the best choice here
Join the discussion