BREAKING: Target Test Prep releases Brand New 2026 On Demand GMAT prep course

Redeem

Target Test Prep · GMAT

Choose how you want to prepare

Learn live with an expert or move at your own pace. Every option includes the complete TTP study system.

★★★★★5.0559 reviews
Vote for Target Test Prep, Newsweek Readers’ Choice Awards 2026
NEWSWEEK READERS’ CHOICE 2026

BIG NEWS! Target Test Prep has been nominated, and they’d love your vote!

TTP has worked incredibly hard to build the best test prep experience possible, and winning Newsweek’s 2026 Readers’ Choice Award for Best Test Prep would mean a lot to them. If TTP has helped you, they’d be incredibly grateful for your vote. You can vote once each day through September 9.

Vote for TTP
GMATLiveTeach 7 seats left
Chris Peckover
NEXT LIVE COHORT

Oct 13 to Jan 7, 2027

with Chris Peckover

Schedule
Tue, Thu · 8:00 to 10:00 PM ET
Included
40 live hours + 6 months of GMAT OnDemand
  • Live instruction and real-time questions
  • Class recordings and assigned practice
View class & enroll
Limited cohort · enrollment openTarget Test Prep
EALiveTeach 5 seats left
Logan Thompson
EXECUTIVE ASSESSMENT

Sep 6 to Dec 6, 2026

with Logan Thompson

Schedule
Sun · 9:30 AM to 12:30 PM ET
Included
40 hours of live online classes plus six months of access to the complete TTP EA OnDemand course.
  • 165+ EA Score Guarantee
  • 4,100+ Quant, Verbal, and Integrated Reasoning practice questions
  • 400+ hours of in-depth video lessons
  • 3,000+ step-by-step video solutions
View EA class & enroll
Limited cohort · enrollment openTarget Test Prep
GMATOnDemand Start anytime
SELF-PACED MASTERCLASS

Target Test Prep GMAT OnDemand

Complete access from day one. Study on your schedule.

715+ score guarantee
$0to start then $127/mo
  • Personalized study plan and analytics
  • Thousands of lessons and practice questions

Compare the format, schedule, and included access before enrolling. Prices and seat counts shown reflect the supplied offer details.

princeton review

Expert replies
by shrutee » Tue Sep 27, 2011 6:23 pm
A study showed that only 10 percent of American dog owners enroll their dogs in formal obidience trainig classes.More than 20 percent of these dog owners,the study also showed,participate in dog shows.Thus,it is obviuos that people who train their dogs are more likely to participate in dog shows than are people who do not train their dogs.

The conclusion above is correct pprovided which of the following statements is also true?

A)It is impossible for a dog to compete in a dog show if the dog has not completed at least one formal obidience training class

B)The proportion of dog owners who enroll their dogs in formal obidience classes is representative of the proportion who train thier dogs outside such classes

C)Dog owners who participate in dog shows only train their dogs by enrolling them in formal obedience training classes

D)participation in dog shows is a reliable indicator of how much attention a dog owner pays to his dog.

E)Only purebred dogs can participate in dog shows,so many owners who enroll their dogs in formal obidience training classes are excluded from this activity.
Join the discussion
Source: — Critical Reasoning |

by bhavsk9 » Tue Sep 27, 2011 8:55 pm
Join the discussion

by navami » Wed Sep 28, 2011 5:18 am
IMO B
This time no looking back!!!
Navami
Join the discussion

by mundasingh123 » Wed Sep 28, 2011 7:32 am
bhavsk9 wrote:Please refer to this post:
https://www.beatthegmat.com/dog-training ... 60339.html
There is no expert reply on this thread
I Seek Explanations Not Answers
Join the discussion

by sl750 » Thu Sep 29, 2011 7:50 am
Answer A. This is a case of causal reasoning

Enroll dog in obedience training -> Participate in dog shows
Join the discussion

by HSPA » Sun Oct 02, 2011 3:12 am
A is an extreme option
sl750 wrote:Answer A. This is a case of causal reasoning

Enroll dog in obedience training -> Participate in dog shows
First take: 640 (50M, 27V) - RC needs 300% improvement
Second take: coming soon..
Regards,
HSPA.
Join the discussion

by GmatKiss » Sun Oct 02, 2011 3:53 am
IMO:B OA and OE please!
Join the discussion

by sl750 » Mon Oct 03, 2011 12:20 am
HSPA wrote:A is an extreme option
sl750 wrote:Answer A. This is a case of causal reasoning

Enroll dog in obedience training -> Participate in dog shows
Agreed, it may seem extreme because of the usage of the word impossible. But the conclusion is also extreme, so to speak. It draws a conclusion based on a sample that may not be representative of all dog owners in that country
Join the discussion

by mankey » Sun Oct 09, 2011 9:40 am
Some expert please respond on this one.

Thanks
Mankey
Join the discussion

by adi_800 » Fri Oct 14, 2011 10:18 am
The author jumps from obidience trainig classes to 'who train'.. So, you need option that plugs this gap.. A does the same perfectly !!
Join the discussion

by mankey » Sun Oct 16, 2011 12:35 am
Can someone please post the OA?

Thanks
Mankey
Join the discussion

by GmatKiss » Sun Oct 16, 2011 1:41 pm
It has to be B

+1000 for B :)
Join the discussion

by GmatKiss » Sun Oct 16, 2011 1:44 pm
sl750 wrote:Answer A. This is a case of causal reasoning

Enroll dog in obedience training -> Participate in dog shows
A is way too extreme!!

then where does the remaining 79% of the dogs come from???

More than 20 percent of these dog owners,the study also showed,participate in dog shows
More than 20% can mean 21,22,....< 100

B is proper!!!!!
Join the discussion

by GmatKiss » Mon Oct 17, 2011 4:19 am
Guys,

what's your take on this one!
Join the discussion

by mankey » Mon Oct 17, 2011 9:26 am
No consensus, getting formed here. To me it looks like B, A looks very extreme as someone already mentioned.

Some expert is needed to throw some more light.

Thanks.
Join the discussion