Live GMAT classes with Target Test Prep start Nov 21 and Nov 22. First class free.

See classes
Target Test Prep · GMAT

Choose how you want to prepare

Learn live with an expert or move at your own pace. Every option includes the complete TTP study system.

Newsweek Readers’ Choice Awards 2026 winner: Target Test Prep, #1 Test Prep

Target Test Prep was voted #1 Best Test Prep in the 2026 Newsweek Readers’ Choice™ Awards.

★★★★★5.0563 reviews
GMATLiveTeachStarts Nov 22
Josh Braslow, Target Test Prep GMAT expert
LIVE ONLINE CLASSES

Get Ready for GMAT Test Day Faster with Live Online Classes

with Josh Braslow, 20+ years in test prep

Nov 22 · Josh Braslow
Sun · 9:30 AM to 12:30 PM ET
Included
40 hours of live online classes + 6 months of TTP OnDemand
  • Attend the first class for free
  • Every class is recorded, so you never fall behind
View classes & enroll
Limited seats availableTarget Test Prep
EALiveTeachOnDemandStart anytime
EXECUTIVE ASSESSMENT

Target Test Prep EA OnDemand

Self-paced EA prep. Study on your schedule.

EXECUTIVE ASSESSMENT

with

165+ EA score guarantee
$05-day trial no automatic billing
Schedule
Included
40 hours of live online classes plus six months of access to the complete TTP EA OnDemand course.
  • 165+ EA Score Guarantee
  • 4,100+ Quant, Verbal, and Integrated Reasoning practice questions
  • 400+ hours of in-depth video lessons
  • 3,000+ step-by-step video solutions
View EA class & enroll Start free 5-day trial
Limited cohort · enrollment openTrial includes full course accessTarget Test Prep
GMATOnDemandStart anytime
SELF-PACED MASTERCLASS

Target Test Prep GMAT OnDemand

Complete access from day one. Study on your schedule.

715+ score guarantee
$0to start then $127/mo
  • Personalized study plan and analytics
  • Thousands of lessons and practice questions

princeton review

Expert replies
by shrutee » Tue Sep 27, 2011 6:23 pm
A study showed that only 10 percent of American dog owners enroll their dogs in formal obidience trainig classes.More than 20 percent of these dog owners,the study also showed,participate in dog shows.Thus,it is obviuos that people who train their dogs are more likely to participate in dog shows than are people who do not train their dogs.

The conclusion above is correct pprovided which of the following statements is also true?

A)It is impossible for a dog to compete in a dog show if the dog has not completed at least one formal obidience training class

B)The proportion of dog owners who enroll their dogs in formal obidience classes is representative of the proportion who train thier dogs outside such classes

C)Dog owners who participate in dog shows only train their dogs by enrolling them in formal obedience training classes

D)participation in dog shows is a reliable indicator of how much attention a dog owner pays to his dog.

E)Only purebred dogs can participate in dog shows,so many owners who enroll their dogs in formal obidience training classes are excluded from this activity.
Join the discussion
Source: — Critical Reasoning |

by bhavsk9 » Tue Sep 27, 2011 8:55 pm
Join the discussion

by navami » Wed Sep 28, 2011 5:18 am
IMO B
This time no looking back!!!
Navami
Join the discussion

by mundasingh123 » Wed Sep 28, 2011 7:32 am
bhavsk9 wrote:Please refer to this post:
https://www.beatthegmat.com/dog-training ... 60339.html
There is no expert reply on this thread
I Seek Explanations Not Answers
Join the discussion

by sl750 » Thu Sep 29, 2011 7:50 am
Answer A. This is a case of causal reasoning

Enroll dog in obedience training -> Participate in dog shows
Join the discussion

by HSPA » Sun Oct 02, 2011 3:12 am
A is an extreme option
sl750 wrote:Answer A. This is a case of causal reasoning

Enroll dog in obedience training -> Participate in dog shows
First take: 640 (50M, 27V) - RC needs 300% improvement
Second take: coming soon..
Regards,
HSPA.
Join the discussion

by GmatKiss » Sun Oct 02, 2011 3:53 am
IMO:B OA and OE please!
Join the discussion

by sl750 » Mon Oct 03, 2011 12:20 am
HSPA wrote:A is an extreme option
sl750 wrote:Answer A. This is a case of causal reasoning

Enroll dog in obedience training -> Participate in dog shows
Agreed, it may seem extreme because of the usage of the word impossible. But the conclusion is also extreme, so to speak. It draws a conclusion based on a sample that may not be representative of all dog owners in that country
Join the discussion

by mankey » Sun Oct 09, 2011 9:40 am
Some expert please respond on this one.

Thanks
Mankey
Join the discussion

by adi_800 » Fri Oct 14, 2011 10:18 am
The author jumps from obidience trainig classes to 'who train'.. So, you need option that plugs this gap.. A does the same perfectly !!
Join the discussion

by mankey » Sun Oct 16, 2011 12:35 am
Can someone please post the OA?

Thanks
Mankey
Join the discussion

by GmatKiss » Sun Oct 16, 2011 1:41 pm
It has to be B

+1000 for B :)
Join the discussion

by GmatKiss » Sun Oct 16, 2011 1:44 pm
sl750 wrote:Answer A. This is a case of causal reasoning

Enroll dog in obedience training -> Participate in dog shows
A is way too extreme!!

then where does the remaining 79% of the dogs come from???

More than 20 percent of these dog owners,the study also showed,participate in dog shows
More than 20% can mean 21,22,....< 100

B is proper!!!!!
Join the discussion

by GmatKiss » Mon Oct 17, 2011 4:19 am
Guys,

what's your take on this one!
Join the discussion

by mankey » Mon Oct 17, 2011 9:26 am
No consensus, getting formed here. To me it looks like B, A looks very extreme as someone already mentioned.

Some expert is needed to throw some more light.

Thanks.
Join the discussion