princeton review

This topic has expert replies
Legendary Member
Posts: 1084
Joined: Fri Apr 15, 2011 2:33 pm
Thanked: 158 times
Followed by:21 members

by pemdas » Mon Oct 17, 2011 9:52 am
let me give this q. a shoot too

choices a and c make argument below useless, as it's concluded that both can attend dog shows and two groups are compared relatively - more likely, less likely

choice d is too general, choice e is too narrow and specific (we cannot assume this much without any reference, clue given)

choice b seems correct
Success doesn't come overnight!

Senior | Next Rank: 100 Posts
Posts: 38
Joined: Tue Sep 13, 2011 6:48 am

by indi » Thu Oct 20, 2011 7:27 am
B is right ..

User avatar
Master | Next Rank: 500 Posts
Posts: 496
Joined: Tue Jun 07, 2011 5:34 am
Thanked: 38 times
Followed by:1 members

by sl750 » Thu Oct 20, 2011 8:22 am
GmatKiss wrote:
sl750 wrote:Answer A. This is a case of causal reasoning

Enroll dog in obedience training -> Participate in dog shows
A is way too extreme!!

then where does the remaining 79% of the dogs come from???

More than 20 percent of these dog owners,the study also showed,participate in dog shows
More than 20% can mean 21,22,....< 100

B is proper!!!!!
Is there any reason why you are using large fonts to make your point?

Don't assume that just because an answer uses extreme language that it has to be wrong

If you are going to counter my point you had better put more substance in your choice of answer. A mere "B is proper" doesn't cut it