let me give this q. a shoot too
choices a and c make argument below useless, as it's concluded that both can attend dog shows and two groups are compared relatively - more likely, less likely
choice d is too general, choice e is too narrow and specific (we cannot assume this much without any reference, clue given)
choice b seems correct
princeton review
- sl750
- Master | Next Rank: 500 Posts
- Posts: 496
- Joined: Tue Jun 07, 2011 5:34 am
- Thanked: 38 times
- Followed by:1 members
Is there any reason why you are using large fonts to make your point?GmatKiss wrote:A is way too extreme!!sl750 wrote:Answer A. This is a case of causal reasoning
Enroll dog in obedience training -> Participate in dog shows
then where does the remaining 79% of the dogs come from???
More than 20 percent of these dog owners,the study also showed,participate in dog shows
More than 20% can mean 21,22,....< 100
B is proper!!!!!
Don't assume that just because an answer uses extreme language that it has to be wrong
If you are going to counter my point you had better put more substance in your choice of answer. A mere "B is proper" doesn't cut it












