BREAKING: Target Test Prep releases Brand New 2026 On Demand GMAT prep course

Redeem

Target Test Prep · GMAT

Choose how you want to prepare

Learn live with an expert or move at your own pace. Every option includes the complete TTP study system.

★★★★★5.0559 reviews
Vote for Target Test Prep, Newsweek Readers’ Choice Awards 2026
NEWSWEEK READERS’ CHOICE 2026

BIG NEWS! Target Test Prep has been nominated, and they’d love your vote!

TTP has worked incredibly hard to build the best test prep experience possible, and winning Newsweek’s 2026 Readers’ Choice Award for Best Test Prep would mean a lot to them. If TTP has helped you, they’d be incredibly grateful for your vote. You can vote once each day through September 9.

Vote for TTP
GMATLiveTeach 7 seats left
Chris Peckover
NEXT LIVE COHORT

Oct 13 to Jan 7, 2027

with Chris Peckover

Schedule
Tue, Thu · 8:00 to 10:00 PM ET
Included
40 live hours + 6 months of GMAT OnDemand
  • Live instruction and real-time questions
  • Class recordings and assigned practice
View class & enroll
Limited cohort · enrollment openTarget Test Prep
EALiveTeach 5 seats left
Logan Thompson
EXECUTIVE ASSESSMENT

Sep 6 to Dec 6, 2026

with Logan Thompson

Schedule
Sun · 9:30 AM to 12:30 PM ET
Included
40 hours of live online classes plus six months of access to the complete TTP EA OnDemand course.
  • 165+ EA Score Guarantee
  • 4,100+ Quant, Verbal, and Integrated Reasoning practice questions
  • 400+ hours of in-depth video lessons
  • 3,000+ step-by-step video solutions
View EA class & enroll
Limited cohort · enrollment openTarget Test Prep
GMATOnDemand Start anytime
SELF-PACED MASTERCLASS

Target Test Prep GMAT OnDemand

Complete access from day one. Study on your schedule.

715+ score guarantee
$0to start then $127/mo
  • Personalized study plan and analytics
  • Thousands of lessons and practice questions
Start free 5-day trial
Read 559 reviewsTarget Test Prep

Compare the format, schedule, and included access before enrolling. Prices and seat counts shown reflect the supplied offer details.

Tough SC question2

Expert replies
Post new topic Locked
Previous Topic Next Topic
User avatar
Senior | Next Rank: 100 Posts
Posts: 61
Joined: Sun Sep 05, 2010 12:42 amFollowed by: 1 member
Thanked: 4 times
by kashefian » Wed Oct 06, 2010 1:14 pm
In a controversial decision, the effects of which still reverberate today, the
Supreme Court decided that in certain legal respects, a corporation has the
same rights as does an individual and enabled them to donate money to
politicians.
A. and enabled them to donate money to politicians
B. and enabling them to donate money to politicians
C. and enabling it to donate money to politicians
D. and enabled it to donate money to politicians
E. and is able to donate money to politicians
Top
Join the discussion
Log in to postLogin with Googleuse password
QUOTE IN REPLY
Source: — Sentence Correction |
Master | Next Rank: 500 Posts
Posts: 174
Joined: Fri Apr 02, 2010 3:41 pmFollowed by: 1 member
Thanked: 6 times

by sanabk » Wed Oct 06, 2010 1:35 pm
C
Top
Join the discussion
Log in to postLogin with Googleuse password
QUOTE IN REPLY
Master | Next Rank: 500 Posts
Posts: 268
Joined: Sat Aug 15, 2009 9:22 amFollowed by: 1 member
Thanked: 19 times
GMAT Score:700

by capnx » Wed Oct 06, 2010 2:09 pm
what's the OA?

I'd pick D
Top
Join the discussion
Log in to postLogin with Googleuse password
QUOTE IN REPLY
User avatar
Legendary Member
Posts: 1172
Joined: Wed Apr 28, 2010 6:20 pmFollowed by: 4 members
Thanked: 74 times

by uwhusky » Wed Oct 06, 2010 6:19 pm
I'll pick E.

a corporation has the same rights as does an individual and is able to donate money to politicians.

All the other choices are nonsensical and missing an agent of verb.
Yep.
Top
Join the discussion
Log in to postLogin with Googleuse password
QUOTE IN REPLY
User avatar
Legendary Member
Posts: 1261
Joined: Sun Sep 14, 2008 3:46 am
Thanked: 27 times
GMAT Score:570

by reply2spg » Wed Oct 06, 2010 8:25 pm
IMO E

C and D are seem to be parallel to 'decided'. If it is so then meaning is getting changed. Therefore, E is correct.
kashefian wrote:In a controversial decision, the effects of which still reverberate today, the
Supreme Court decided that in certain legal respects, a corporation has the
same rights as does an individual and enabled them to donate money to
politicians.
A. and enabled them to donate money to politicians
B. and enabling them to donate money to politicians
C. and enabling it to donate money to politicians
D. and enabled it to donate money to politicians
E. and is able to donate money to politicians
Last edited by reply2spg on Wed Oct 06, 2010 9:31 pm, edited 1 time in total.
Sudhanshu
(have lot of things to learn from all of you)
Top
Join the discussion
Log in to postLogin with Googleuse password
QUOTE IN REPLY
User avatar
Legendary Member
Posts: 516
Joined: Mon Nov 02, 2009 6:42 amFollowed by: 1 member
Location: Mumbai
Thanked: 14 times
GMAT Score:710

by ankurmit » Wed Oct 06, 2010 8:36 pm
IMO E
--------
Ankur mittal
Top
Join the discussion
Log in to postLogin with Googleuse password
QUOTE IN REPLY
Master | Next Rank: 500 Posts
Posts: 358
Joined: Fri Jun 25, 2010 9:47 amFollowed by: 4 members
Location: Mumbai
Thanked: 34 times
GMAT Score:740

by karanrulz4ever » Wed Oct 06, 2010 9:24 pm
IMO E
Top
Join the discussion
Log in to postLogin with Googleuse password
QUOTE IN REPLY
Legendary Member
Posts: 520
Joined: Mon Jun 14, 2010 10:44 amFollowed by: 6 members
Thanked: 70 times

by niksworth » Thu Oct 07, 2010 9:36 am
uwhusky wrote:I'll pick E.

a corporation has the same rights as does an individual and is able to donate money to politicians.

All the other choices are nonsensical and missing an agent of verb.
Isn't E nonsensical itself?

In certain legal respects, a corporation has the same rights as does an individual and is able to donate money to politicians.

In certain respects, a corporation is able to donate money to politicians - What does it even mean? Ugly.

I suspect D might be right.

The Supreme Court
- decided that in certain legal respects, a corporation has the same rights as does an individual
and
- enabled it to donate money to politicians.

This makes better sense. Not a stellar question though.
scio me nihil scire
Top
Join the discussion
Log in to postLogin with Googleuse password
QUOTE IN REPLY
User avatar
Legendary Member
Posts: 1172
Joined: Wed Apr 28, 2010 6:20 pmFollowed by: 4 members
Thanked: 74 times

by uwhusky » Thu Oct 07, 2010 9:54 am
The way the sentence is structured, I thought that a corporation had to be the subject of the clause.

Perhaps the meaning might be little off, but I just can't see any other choice being correct grammar wise.

I'll just settle with this question being less than stellar.
Yep.
Top
Join the discussion
Log in to postLogin with Googleuse password
QUOTE IN REPLY
User avatar
Senior | Next Rank: 100 Posts
Posts: 40
Joined: Mon Aug 30, 2010 4:55 am
Location: Baku, Azerbaijan

by bakhshaliyev » Thu Oct 07, 2010 10:06 am
An inventory equal to 90 days sales is as much as even the strongest businesses carry, and then only as a way to anticipate higher prices or ensure against shortages.

a.
b. ....
c. so much as even

I could not decide which to choose a. or c. i have chosen c but the correct answer is a. can somebody explain me plz why a. is the correct answer?
Top
Join the discussion
Log in to postLogin with Googleuse password
QUOTE IN REPLY
Legendary Member
Posts: 759
Joined: Mon Apr 26, 2010 10:15 amFollowed by: 3 members
Thanked: 85 times

by clock60 » Thu Oct 07, 2010 10:16 am
vote for D,
while E does not contain any grammer mistakes, it does not convey the intended meaning,
the raeasons are the the same as mentioned by nicksworth
the court decided ..... and ennabled..
the company is able to donate without permissions, but it can be forbid to do so.
Top
Join the discussion
Log in to postLogin with Googleuse password
QUOTE IN REPLY
User avatar
Senior | Next Rank: 100 Posts
Posts: 61
Joined: Sun Sep 05, 2010 12:42 amFollowed by: 1 member
Thanked: 4 times

by kashefian » Thu Oct 07, 2010 9:37 pm
I suspect D might be right.

The Supreme Court
- decided that in certain legal respects, a corporation has the same rights as does an individual
and
- enabled it to donate money to politicians.

This makes better sense. Not a stellar question though.
Totally agreed. Choice E does not make sense. However, the answers stated in book "Conquering GMAT verbal and writing" states the following:

Answer E. The "corporation" is a singular noun, so "them" does not
agree. Choices A and Choice B are incorrect. For parallelism purposes,
choice E is best because the clause reads "the corporation
has...and is..." The other choices use the wrong verb form.
Top
Join the discussion
Log in to postLogin with Googleuse password
QUOTE IN REPLY
Senior | Next Rank: 100 Posts
Posts: 68
Joined: Tue Sep 21, 2010 11:24 amFollowed by: 1 member

by Ramneet Singh » Fri Oct 08, 2010 2:01 am
kashefian wrote:In a controversial decision, the effects of which still reverberate today, the
Supreme Court decided that in certain legal respects, a corporation has the
same rights as does an individual and enabled them to donate money to
politicians.
A. and enabled them to donate money to politicians
B. and enabling them to donate money to politicians
C. and enabling it to donate money to politicians
D. and enabled it to donate money to politicians
E. and is able to donate money to politicians
From what i gathered from the following url, it is not the court which enables an entity to do something but the laws that the court pass or the judgement or the provisions that enable.
however i am still not sure 100% sure.
https://examples.yourdictionary.com/enable
Top
Join the discussion
Log in to postLogin with Googleuse password
QUOTE IN REPLY
User avatar
Master | Next Rank: 500 Posts
Posts: 108
Joined: Fri Jul 09, 2010 8:15 am
Location: 127.0.0.1
Thanked: 15 times

by gmatrix » Fri Oct 08, 2010 2:53 am
my pick E

read it as:

a corporation has the same rights as does an individual and

a corporation .... is able to donate money to politicians

is correctly denotes the singular noun-corporation
Life is all about ass; you're either covering it, laughing it off, kicking it, kissing it, busting it, trying to get a piece of it, or behaving like one.
Top
Join the discussion
Log in to postLogin with Googleuse password
QUOTE IN REPLY
Senior | Next Rank: 100 Posts
Posts: 36
Joined: Thu Dec 31, 2009 5:54 am
Location: New York City
Thanked: 2 times

by bdevas01 » Fri Oct 08, 2010 4:54 am
The answer is E

The is a parallelism question:

The supreme court decided that in certain legal respects, a corporation has the same rights as does an individual.

AND

The supreme court decided that in certain legal respects, a corporation is able to donate money to politicians.

_____________________________________

WRONG:

The supreme court decided that in certain legal respects, a corporation enabled/enables to donate money to politicians.
Top
Join the discussion
Log in to postLogin with Googleuse password
QUOTE IN REPLY
Post new topic Locked