BREAKING: Target Test Prep releases Brand New 2026 On Demand GMAT prep course

Redeem

Target Test Prep · GMAT

Choose how you want to prepare

Learn live with an expert or move at your own pace. Every option includes the complete TTP study system.

★★★★★5.0559 reviews
Vote for Target Test Prep, Newsweek Readers’ Choice Awards 2026
NEWSWEEK READERS’ CHOICE 2026

BIG NEWS! We’ve been nominated, and we’d love your vote!

We’ve worked incredibly hard to build TTP into the best test prep experience possible, and it would mean a lot to us to win Newsweek’s 2026 Readers’ Choice Award for Best Test Prep. If TTP has helped you, we’d be incredibly grateful for your vote. You can vote once each day through September 9.

Vote for TTP
GMATLiveTeach 7 seats left
Chris Peckover
NEXT LIVE COHORT

Oct 13 to Jan 7, 2027

with Chris Peckover

Schedule
Tue, Thu · 8:00 to 10:00 PM ET
Included
40 live hours + 6 months of GMAT OnDemand
  • Live instruction and real-time questions
  • Class recordings and assigned practice
View class & enroll
Limited cohort · enrollment openTarget Test Prep
EALiveTeach 5 seats left
Logan Thompson
EXECUTIVE ASSESSMENT

Sep 6 to Dec 6, 2026

with Logan Thompson

Schedule
Sun · 9:30 AM to 12:30 PM ET
Included
Live EA class + 6 months of EA OnDemand
  • Expert-led weekly online sessions
  • EA Masterclass access between classes
View EA class & enroll
Limited cohort · enrollment openTarget Test Prep
GMATOnDemand Start anytime
SELF-PACED MASTERCLASS

Target Test Prep GMAT OnDemand

Complete access from day one. Study on your schedule.

715+ score guarantee
$0to start then $127/mo
  • Personalized study plan and analytics
  • Thousands of lessons and practice questions

Compare the format, schedule, and included access before enrolling. Prices and seat counts shown reflect the supplied offer details.

There was a ninenteenth century chemist.

Expert replies
by goelmohit2002 » Fri Jun 12, 2009 6:25 am
Hi All,

In the below question, the OA is "A". I also arrived at this answer somehow. But can someone please help me understand on what basis we can choose between "critique" and "critiquing" split. Why Critiquing is wrong in this question.

===============================================
The nineteenth-century chemist Humphry Davy presented the results of his early experiments in his “Essay on Heat and Light,” a critique of all chemistry since Robert Boyle as well as a vision of a new chemistry that Davy hoped to found.

A. a critique of all chemistry since Robert Boyle as well as a vision of a
B. a critique of all chemistry following Robert Boyle and also his envisioning of a
C. a critique of all chemistry after Robert Boyle and envisioning as well
D. critiquing all chemistry from Robert Boyle forward and also a vision of
E. critiquing all the chemistry done since Robert Boyle as well as his own envisioning of
Join the discussion
Source: — Sentence Correction |

by ajay_deepak » Fri Jun 12, 2009 7:22 am
a critique modifies the book "Essay on Heat and Light". Critiquing can't really be an apt modifier here.
Join the discussion

by goelmohit2002 » Fri Jun 12, 2009 11:38 am
ajay_deepak wrote:a critique modifies the book "Essay on Heat and Light". Critiquing can't really be an apt modifier here.
Can you please help me understand why Critiquing can't really be an apt modifier ?

What is wrong with it ?
Join the discussion

by ajay_deepak » Fri Jun 12, 2009 6:33 pm
The book is a noun and critiquing is a verb. Modifier mismatch.

Also B, C and D lack parallelism. Now in E...it should have been 'critiquing....and envisioning of' to maintain parallelism. 'Critiquing...and his own envisioning of' doesn't maintain the parallelism as the former will make more sense. So one more reason to eliminate E.

Thus A.
Join the discussion

by goelmohit2002 » Sat Jun 13, 2009 3:32 am
ajay_deepak wrote:The book is a noun and critiquing is a verb. Modifier mismatch.

Also B, C and D lack parallelism. Now in E...it should have been 'critiquing....and envisioning of' to maintain parallelism. 'Critiquing...and his own envisioning of' doesn't maintain the parallelism as the former will make more sense. So one more reason to eliminate E.

Thus A.
Thanks.

Why can't "critiquing" modify presented...i.e. the verb of the previous clause...

He presented and in that he critiqued....

if "critiquing....and envisioning..." would have been a modifier...then would it have been fine...? or it still would have been wrong....
Join the discussion

by ketkoag » Sun Jun 14, 2009 9:52 pm
here critiquing doesn't makes it clear that who is critiquing, the author or the book.. so critique would be the right choice and among A, B, C A follows the parallel structure and is clear..
Join the discussion

by hk » Mon Jun 15, 2009 12:55 pm
Simple way to eliminate answers is to look for common error.

b,c,d have parallelism error. Hence eliminate them.

We are left with A, E.

You can eliminate E on the grounds that it changes the meaning. E says - they guy/book is critiquing all the chemistry and his own envisioning. His book is not meant to critique his own envisioning. Its critiquing only all the chemistry since Robert Boyle.

So the answer is A!!!
Wanna know what I'm upto? Follow me on twitter: https://twitter.com/harikrish
Join the discussion

by goelmohit2002 » Mon Jun 15, 2009 1:06 pm
ajay_deepak wrote:The book is a noun and critiquing is a verb. Modifier mismatch.
I am not sure that this rule applies in GMAT world...( I am not sure about general English grammar as such... :-))......

In my opinion there are couple of examples given in OG-10 and OG-11, where a noun is modified by verb modifier...

For e.g. can someone please help me understand what is wrong in the below sentence....where verb modifier is modifying noun( author)..... As per my understanding the below sentence is correct sentence in GMAT.(atleast as per modifier rule is concerned)....

Please correct me if my understanding is wrong.

"XYZ author, carefully analysing ABC....., did PQR...."
Join the discussion

by perfectstranger » Mon Jun 15, 2009 5:07 pm
hk wrote:Simple way to eliminate answers is to look for common error.

b,c,d have parallelism error. Hence eliminate them.

We are left with A, E.

You can eliminate E on the grounds that it changes the meaning. E says - they guy/book is critiquing all the chemistry and his own envisioning. His book is not meant to critique his own envisioning. Its critiquing only all the chemistry since Robert Boyle.

So the answer is A!!!
Could you please show the paralelisms in B,C and D?
Please do not post answers visibly . Please hide them or post them later after the discussion.
Join the discussion

by goelmohit2002 » Mon Jun 15, 2009 9:59 pm
perfectstranger wrote:
hk wrote:Simple way to eliminate answers is to look for common error.

b,c,d have parallelism error. Hence eliminate them.

We are left with A, E.

You can eliminate E on the grounds that it changes the meaning. E says - they guy/book is critiquing all the chemistry and his own envisioning. His book is not meant to critique his own envisioning. Its critiquing only all the chemistry since Robert Boyle.

So the answer is A!!!
Could you please show the paralelisms in B,C and D?
Parallelism is broken in "B", "C" and "D" because of the following:

B = "a critique....and also his envisioning"
C. a critique .......... and envisioning
D. critiquing ......... and also a vision of
Join the discussion

by hemanth28 » Sat Jun 27, 2009 10:13 am
can some one explain the subtle difference between the use of "and" and "as well as" ?
GMAT First take :- 680
Getting the guns ready for second shot !!!
https://beatenbygmat.blocked
Join the discussion

by goelmohit2002 » Sat Jun 27, 2009 10:34 am
hemanth28 wrote:can some one explain the subtle difference between the use of "and" and "as well as" ?
IMO "and" makes the subject plural...

"as well as" is used to add just fluff...in Manhattan terminology middlemen...

e.g.

X and Y "are" doing PQR
X, as well as Y, "is"....doing PQR
Join the discussion

by hemanth28 » Sat Jun 27, 2009 7:48 pm
goelmohit2002 wrote:
hemanth28 wrote:can some one explain the subtle difference between the use of "and" and "as well as" ?
IMO "and" makes the subject plural...

"as well as" is used to add just fluff...in Manhattan terminology middlemen...

e.g.

X and Y "are" doing PQR
X, as well as Y, "is"....doing PQR
In this case the verb is not being tested since the verb is past participle. Is there any other difference interms on what the sentence is stressing on ?
GMAT First take :- 680
Getting the guns ready for second shot !!!
https://beatenbygmat.blocked
Join the discussion

by umaa » Thu Aug 13, 2009 9:20 am
I'm resuming this thread as I still have not clarified with CRITIQUE and CRITIQUING.

A says A BOOK is a CRITIQUE of all chemistry since ROBERT BOYLE. Here, Are we comparing the BOOK and ROBERT BOYLE.
don't you think it should be CRITIQUING to modify the whole clause.

Anyone?
What we think, we become
Join the discussion

by goelmohit2002 » Thu Aug 13, 2009 9:53 am
umaa wrote:I'm resuming this thread as I still have not clarified with CRITIQUE and CRITIQUING.

A says A BOOK is a CRITIQUE of all chemistry since ROBERT BOYLE. Here, Are we comparing the BOOK and ROBERT BOYLE.
don't you think it should be CRITIQUING to modify the whole clause.

Anyone?
Even if we say critiquing....then D and E IMO are wrong because of parallelism issue...both of them are not parallel
Join the discussion