BREAKING: Target Test Prep releases Brand New 2026 On Demand GMAT prep course

Redeem

Target Test Prep · GMAT

Choose how you want to prepare

Learn live with an expert or move at your own pace. Every option includes the complete TTP study system.

★★★★★5.0563 reviews
Newsweek Readers’ Choice Awards 2026 winner: Target Test Prep, #1 Test Prep
NEWSWEEK READERS’ CHOICE AWARDS 2026

Target Test Prep was voted #1 Best Test Prep in the 2026 Newsweek Readers’ Choice™ Awards.

GMATLiveTeach Starts Oct 17
Chris Peckover, Target Test Prep GMAT expert
LIVE ONLINE CLASSES

Get Ready for GMAT Test Day Faster with Live Online Classes

with Chris Peckover, 100th-Percentile GMAT Scorer

Oct 17 · Chris Peckover
Sat · 11:00 AM to 2:00 PM ET
Oct 20 · Chris Peckover
Tue, Thu · 8:00 to 10:00 PM ET
Oct 25 · Josh Braslow
Sun · 1:00 to 4:00 PM ET
Included
40 hours of live online classes + 6 months of TTP OnDemand
  • Attend the first class for free
  • Every class is recorded, so you never fall behind
View classes & enroll
Limited seats availableTarget Test Prep
EALiveTeachOnDemand 5 seats left Start anytime
EXECUTIVE ASSESSMENT

Target Test Prep EA OnDemand

Self-paced EA prep. Study on your schedule.

Logan Thompson
EXECUTIVE ASSESSMENT

Sep 6 to Dec 6, 2026

with Logan Thompson

165+ EA score guarantee
$05-day trial no automatic billing
Schedule
Sun · 9:30 AM to 12:30 PM ET
Included
40 hours of live online classes plus six months of access to the complete TTP EA OnDemand course.
  • 165+ EA Score Guarantee
  • 4,100+ Quant, Verbal, and Integrated Reasoning practice questions
  • 400+ hours of in-depth video lessons
  • 3,000+ step-by-step video solutions
View EA class & enroll Start free 5-day trial
Limited cohort · enrollment openTrial includes full course accessTarget Test Prep
GMATOnDemand Start anytime
SELF-PACED MASTERCLASS

Target Test Prep GMAT OnDemand

Complete access from day one. Study on your schedule.

715+ score guarantee
$0to start then $127/mo
  • Personalized study plan and analytics
  • Thousands of lessons and practice questions

Compare the format, schedule, and included access before enrolling. Prices and seat counts shown reflect the supplied offer details.

The apples sold in this cafeteria are greasy

Expert replies
by thephoenix » Thu May 06, 2010 3:44 am
Cafeteria patron: The apples sold in this cafeteria are greasy. The cashier told me that the apples are in that condition when they are delivered to the cafeteria and that the cafeteria does not wash the apples it sells. Most fruit is sprayed with dangerous pesticides before it is harvested, and is dangerous until it is washed. Clearly, the cafeteria is selling pesticide-covered fruit, thereby endangering its patrons.
Which one of the following is an assumption on which the argument depends?
(A) The apples that the cafeteria sells are not thoroughly washed after harvest but before reaching the cafeteria.
(B) Most pesticides that are sprayed on fruit before harvest leave a greasy residue on the fruit.
(C) Many of the cafeteria's patrons are unaware that the cafeteria does not wash the apples it sells.
(D) Only pesticides that leave a greasy residue on fruit can be washed off.
(E) Fruits other than apples also arrive at the cafeteria in a greasy condition
lsat
Many of the great achievements of the world were accomplished by tired and discouraged men who kept on working
Join the discussion
Source: — Critical Reasoning |

by pradeepkaushal9518 » Thu May 06, 2010 4:52 am
imo A.

cafeteria thinks that after harvesting apples are not washed but before reaching cafeteria they washed it , hence they sell as it is

what is oa
Join the discussion

by gmatmachoman » Thu May 06, 2010 5:10 am
, A should be the answer.
Last edited by gmatmachoman on Thu May 06, 2010 6:29 am, edited 1 time in total.
Join the discussion

by 2011mbaspirant » Thu May 06, 2010 5:20 am
IMO it is E as the final conclusionof the argument points towards fruits in general. The case of apple is used only as an example to build a case for the overall conclusion. Please correct me if I am wrong.
Join the discussion

by rockeyb » Thu May 06, 2010 9:44 am
I think the answer should be B .

The very first line states : The apples sold in this cafeteria are greasy.

No where in the passage dose the author says that pesticides make the fruit greasy .

The conclusion states : the cafeteria is selling pesticide-covered fruit, thereby endangering its patrons .

So to successfully draw this conclusion the author should have assumed that pesticides causes the apple to be greasy .

Option E is in correct as the conclusion talks about a single Fruit , and from the passage we can say the fruit is apple . But we can not say any thing about other fruits .

Option (A) is incorrect as it says the opposite of what is stated .

The passage clearly states that the fruits are delivered unwashed and it sells unwashed fruits .

Please correct me if I am wrong.
"Know thyself" and "Nothing in excess"
Join the discussion

by beat_gmat_09 » Thu May 06, 2010 10:00 am
+1 for B.

Greasy and pesticides should be linked with each other for the argument to stand.
If we put B to denial test, we come to know that - had the apples were not greasy, ( i.e. if the pesticides would hadn't left greasy residue) no further investigations would had been made to check why they are greasy ... and hence no conclusion that pesticide covered fruits (so called greasy) are sold.
Join the discussion

by orel » Thu May 06, 2010 6:36 pm
B

what's is OA?
Join the discussion

by debmalya_dutta » Thu May 06, 2010 6:58 pm
think it is A .
The conclusion here is :the cafeteria is selling pesticide-covered fruit.
We are looking for an assumption here

look at the following sequence of statements
=> Most fruit is sprayed with dangerous pesticides before it is harvested
=> the cafeteria does not wash the apples it sells

the conclusion hence assumes that the fruit is not washed before it reaches the cafeteria
Join the discussion

by ansumania » Thu May 06, 2010 8:15 pm
OA pl.....
Join the discussion

by paes » Thu May 06, 2010 9:06 pm
IMO A
Join the discussion

by ansh.kumar » Thu May 06, 2010 11:56 pm
MY PICK IS "B". don't overlook the word "THOROUGHLY WASHED" IN "A". its enough to eliminate this option.
Join the discussion

by maxpain » Fri May 07, 2010 1:09 am
+1 for B.

Grease and pesticides have to be connected for the argument to hold.
Join the discussion

by harshavardhanc » Fri May 07, 2010 1:13 am
IMO B. OA plz.
Regards,
Harsha
Join the discussion

by xyztroy » Fri May 07, 2010 10:20 am
I think the ans should be A. This is the only options which works best with the negation...!! pls post the OA
Join the discussion

by harshavardhanc » Fri May 07, 2010 10:43 am
xyztroy wrote:I think the ans should be A. This is the only options which works best with the negation...!! pls post the OA
conclusion : the cafeteria is selling pesticide-covered fruit

premise 1 : The apples sold in this cafeteria are greasy when they are delivered to the cafeteria.
premise 2 : the cafeteria does not wash the apples it sells


if the assumption is A and you negate it :
(A) The apples that the cafeteria sells are thoroughly washed after harvest but before reaching the cafeteria.
the patron can still make his conclusion. He'll say that, though the fruits are washed after the harvest, the greasy material still remains on the fruits and they are in the greasy condition when they are delivered.

However, if you negate B :
(B) Most pesticides that are sprayed on fruit before harvest DO NOT leave a greasy residue on the fruit.
will he be able to conclude that pesticides are the reason for greasiness ?

HTH.
Regards,
Harsha
Join the discussion