Live GMAT classes with Target Test Prep start Nov 21 and Nov 22. First class free.

See classes
Target Test Prep · GMAT

Choose how you want to prepare

Learn live with an expert or move at your own pace. Every option includes the complete TTP study system.

Newsweek Readers’ Choice Awards 2026 winner: Target Test Prep, #1 Test Prep

Target Test Prep was voted #1 Best Test Prep in the 2026 Newsweek Readers’ Choice™ Awards.

★★★★★5.0563 reviews
GMATLiveTeachStarts Nov 1
Josh Braslow, Target Test Prep GMAT expert
LIVE ONLINE CLASSES

Get Ready for GMAT Test Day Faster with Live Online Classes

with Josh Braslow, 20+ years in test prep

Nov 1 · Josh Braslow
Sun · 1:00 to 4:00 PM ET
Nov 22 · Josh Braslow
Sun · 9:30 AM to 12:30 PM ET
Included
40 hours of live online classes + 6 months of TTP OnDemand
  • Attend the first class for free
  • Every class is recorded, so you never fall behind
View classes & enroll
Limited seats availableTarget Test Prep
EALiveTeachOnDemand5 seats leftStart anytime
EXECUTIVE ASSESSMENT

Target Test Prep EA OnDemand

Self-paced EA prep. Study on your schedule.

Logan Thompson
EXECUTIVE ASSESSMENT

Sep 6 to Dec 6, 2026

with Logan Thompson

165+ EA score guarantee
$05-day trial no automatic billing
Schedule
Sun · 9:30 AM to 12:30 PM ET
Included
40 hours of live online classes plus six months of access to the complete TTP EA OnDemand course.
  • 165+ EA Score Guarantee
  • 4,100+ Quant, Verbal, and Integrated Reasoning practice questions
  • 400+ hours of in-depth video lessons
  • 3,000+ step-by-step video solutions
View EA class & enroll Start free 5-day trial
Limited cohort · enrollment openTrial includes full course accessTarget Test Prep
GMATOnDemandStart anytime
SELF-PACED MASTERCLASS

Target Test Prep GMAT OnDemand

Complete access from day one. Study on your schedule.

715+ score guarantee
$0to start then $127/mo
  • Personalized study plan and analytics
  • Thousands of lessons and practice questions

Compare the format, schedule, and included access before enrolling. Prices and seat counts shown reflect the supplied offer details.

Sentence Correction_Verbs

Expert replies
by soumya_165 » Sun Oct 07, 2012 11:03 am
For well over a century, visitors to Yellowstone National Park have looked out over protective barriers and saw Old Faithful spewing up large amounts of water, whose regularity could be used to set a clock.

a) saw Old Faithful spewing up large amounts of water, whose regularity could be used to set a
b) saw Old Faithful spewing up large amounts of water, whose regularity was used to set a
c) saw Old Faithful spewing up large amounts of water, with a regularity that could be used to set a
d) seen Old Faithful spewing up large amounts of water, with a regularity that could be used to set a
e) seen Old Faithful spewing up large amounts of water, whose regularity could be used to set a

Can someone help me out by answering what is wrong with "saw" in the above question
Join the discussion
Source: — Sentence Correction |

by anukrati » Sun Oct 07, 2012 11:47 pm
soumya_165 wrote:For well over a century, visitors to Yellowstone National Park have looked out over protective barriers and saw Old Faithful spewing up large amounts of water, whose regularity could be used to set a clock.

a) saw Old Faithful spewing up large amounts of water, whose regularity could be used to set a
b) saw Old Faithful spewing up large amounts of water, whose regularity was used to set a
c) saw Old Faithful spewing up large amounts of water, with a regularity that could be used to set a
d) seen Old Faithful spewing up large amounts of water, with a regularity that could be used to set a
e) seen Old Faithful spewing up large amounts of water, whose regularity could be used to set a

Can someone help me out by answering what is wrong with "saw" in the above question
In the question, there is a parallelism required because of "AND".
X And Y
In the above statement X is "looked out over protective barriers"
Y is "saw Old Faithful spewing up large amounts of water".

We also need to check that we have "HAVE" before looked, therefore the verb "saw" should go with "have".

So the sentence will become:

For well over a century, visitors to Yellowstone National Park have looked out over protective barriers and have saw Old Faithful spewing up large amounts of water, whose regularity could be used to set a clock. .

In this sentence both actions are happening at the same time the verb should correspond to same form. And with have , we need third form of see which is "seen".
Join the discussion

by Diehard_Learner » Mon Oct 08, 2012 2:24 am
d should be the correct answer.
Join the discussion

by GMATGuruNY » Mon Oct 08, 2012 3:36 am
soumya_165 wrote:For well over a century, visitors to Yellowstone National Park have looked out over protective barriers and saw Old Faithful spewing up large amounts of water, whose regularity could be used to set a clock.

a) saw Old Faithful spewing up large amounts of water, whose regularity could be used to set a
b) saw Old Faithful spewing up large amounts of water, whose regularity was used to set a
c) saw Old Faithful spewing up large amounts of water, with a regularity that could be used to set a
d) seen Old Faithful spewing up large amounts of water, with a regularity that could be used to set a
e) seen Old Faithful spewing up large amounts of water, whose regularity could be used to set a

Can someone help me out by answering what is wrong with "saw" in the above question
In A, B and C, have looked (present perfect) and saw (past) are not parallel.
Eliminate A, B and C.

In E, whose regularity seems to refer to large amounts of water.
Not the intended meaning.
It is not the water itself but the SPEWING of the water that is performed with REGULARITY.
Eliminate E.

The correct answer is D.

AND must connect PARALLEL FORMS.
In the OA, the verbs connected by AND are parallel:
Visitors HAVE LOOKED OUT...and [have] SEEN.
The second have is omitted, but its presence is understood.
Private tutor exclusively for the GMAT and GRE, with over 20 years of experience.
Followed here and elsewhere by over 1900 test-takers.
I have worked with students based in the US, Australia, Taiwan, China, Tajikistan, Kuwait, Saudi Arabia -- a long list of countries.
My students have been admitted to HBS, CBS, Tuck, Yale, Stern, Fuqua -- a long list of top programs.

As a tutor, I don't simply teach you how I would approach problems.
I unlock the best way for YOU to solve problems.

For more information, please email me (Mitch Hunt) at [email protected].
Student Review #1
Student Review #2
Student Review #3
Join the discussion

by Benni » Mon Oct 08, 2012 7:16 am
Hi Mitch,

Could you please help me to understand the "with"-construction a little better.

(1) What kind of modifier is it. (I think it is verb modifier, as it modifies spewing up.)
(2) I have also seen with+participle constructions. They are, as far as I understand, used to have a with+subject of the participle construction+participle. But I am absolutely not sure. So please, please, give me some insight.

Many thanks.
Join the discussion

by GMATGuruNY » Mon Oct 08, 2012 10:58 am
Benni wrote:Hi Mitch,

Could you please help me to understand the "with"-construction a little better.

(1) What kind of modifier is it. (I think it is verb modifier, as it modifies spewing up.)
(2) I have also seen with+participle constructions. They are, as far as I understand, used to have a with+subject of the participle construction+participle. But I am absolutely not sure. So please, please, give me some insight.

Many thanks.
Check my post here:

https://www.beatthegmat.com/adverbial-mo ... 16194.html

Other posts you might find helpful:

https://www.beatthegmat.com/honeybee-s-s ... 13757.html
https://www.beatthegmat.com/use-of-with- ... 89592.html
https://www.beatthegmat.com/prepositiona ... 91955.html
Private tutor exclusively for the GMAT and GRE, with over 20 years of experience.
Followed here and elsewhere by over 1900 test-takers.
I have worked with students based in the US, Australia, Taiwan, China, Tajikistan, Kuwait, Saudi Arabia -- a long list of countries.
My students have been admitted to HBS, CBS, Tuck, Yale, Stern, Fuqua -- a long list of top programs.

As a tutor, I don't simply teach you how I would approach problems.
I unlock the best way for YOU to solve problems.

For more information, please email me (Mitch Hunt) at [email protected].
Student Review #1
Student Review #2
Student Review #3
Join the discussion

by ihatemaths » Mon Oct 08, 2012 10:47 pm
"Have looked" should be paired with "have been seeing" or "seen" so eliminate A , B and C . we are left with D and E .

in E - Whose is ambigous (we don't know if it defines water or the faithful) , so go with D
Join the discussion

by Benni » Tue Oct 09, 2012 10:02 am
Thank you very much for your help. :)
Join the discussion

by tanviet » Wed Oct 10, 2012 3:11 am
WITH PHRASE is versatle because it can modify a preceding noun, a preceding clause

and in this case

a DOING PHRASE.

we should learn from og questions. This is not og question

pls, tell me the similar question in og so that we can learn that WITH PHRASE can modify DOING.

Thank you.
Join the discussion