Live GMAT classes with Target Test Prep start Nov 1 and Nov 21. First class free.

See classes
Target Test Prep · GMAT

Choose how you want to prepare

Learn live with an expert or move at your own pace. Every option includes the complete TTP study system.

Newsweek Readers’ Choice Awards 2026 winner: Target Test Prep, #1 Test Prep

Target Test Prep was voted #1 Best Test Prep in the 2026 Newsweek Readers’ Choice™ Awards.

★★★★★5.0563 reviews
GMATLiveTeachStarts Nov 1
Josh Braslow, Target Test Prep GMAT expert
LIVE ONLINE CLASSES

Get Ready for GMAT Test Day Faster with Live Online Classes

with Josh Braslow, 20+ years in test prep

Nov 1 · Josh Braslow
Sun · 1:00 to 4:00 PM ET
Nov 22 · Josh Braslow
Sun · 9:30 AM to 12:30 PM ET
Included
40 hours of live online classes + 6 months of TTP OnDemand
  • Attend the first class for free
  • Every class is recorded, so you never fall behind
View classes & enroll
Limited seats availableTarget Test Prep
EALiveTeachOnDemand5 seats leftStart anytime
EXECUTIVE ASSESSMENT

Target Test Prep EA OnDemand

Self-paced EA prep. Study on your schedule.

Logan Thompson
EXECUTIVE ASSESSMENT

Sep 6 to Dec 6, 2026

with Logan Thompson

165+ EA score guarantee
$05-day trial no automatic billing
Schedule
Sun · 9:30 AM to 12:30 PM ET
Included
40 hours of live online classes plus six months of access to the complete TTP EA OnDemand course.
  • 165+ EA Score Guarantee
  • 4,100+ Quant, Verbal, and Integrated Reasoning practice questions
  • 400+ hours of in-depth video lessons
  • 3,000+ step-by-step video solutions
View EA class & enroll Start free 5-day trial
Limited cohort · enrollment openTrial includes full course accessTarget Test Prep
GMATOnDemandStart anytime
SELF-PACED MASTERCLASS

Target Test Prep GMAT OnDemand

Complete access from day one. Study on your schedule.

715+ score guarantee
$0to start then $127/mo
  • Personalized study plan and analytics
  • Thousands of lessons and practice questions

Compare the format, schedule, and included access before enrolling. Prices and seat counts shown reflect the supplied offer details.

Pronoun ambiguity- Manhattan SC guide

Expert replies
by winnerhere » Thu Jun 16, 2011 9:47 am
1) Well informed people know that Bordeaux is a french region whose famous export is the wine that bears its name - correct sentence as per Manhattan guide

In the above sentence - its can refer to wine isnt it?

2)Confronted by Radical changes in production and distribution, modern Hollywood studios are attempting various experiments in an effort to retain their status as the primary arbiters of movie consumption - again correct sebntence as per manhattan

In the above sentence their can represent experiments too isnt it?

GMAT in 2 weeks . Please help.

Thanks,
Sai
Last edited by winnerhere on Thu Jun 16, 2011 10:03 am, edited 2 times in total.
Join the discussion
Source: — Sentence Correction |

by Frankenstein » Thu Jun 16, 2011 10:00 am
Hi,
When you are in doubt about pronoun reference, go for the meaning of the sentence. If their refers to experiments sentence doesn't make sense.
Cheers!

Things are not what they appear to be... nor are they otherwise
Join the discussion

by Ashley@VeritasPrep » Thu Jun 16, 2011 10:02 am
Hey Sai,

The good thing about SC on the GMAT is that your job is always only to pick the best option -- not to determine whether that best option is actually perfect.

Your sentences highlight the imperfect correspondence between logical clarity and grammatical clarity. Logically the pronoun referents are clear in both of your sentences, but grammatically, you're right, they're ambiguous in both cases.

Whereas a grammatical ERROR (such as a subject-verb clash or the use of a singular pronoun in reference to a plural antecedent) is NEVER okay, a grammatical *ambiguity* (which is not the same thing as an error) can be let slide oftentimes as long as the meaning is clear.

On the GMAT, if you had as options versions of these sentences that were clear not only logically but also grammatically--and if these options weren't marred by any other grammatical errors--those would certainly be your best options. However, if no such options are present, it's likely that all the other answer choices will feature actual grammatical ERRORS, and in that case, both of these sentences will be acceptable.

Hope that helps!
Last edited by Ashley@VeritasPrep on Wed Jul 06, 2011 7:23 pm, edited 1 time in total.
Ashley Newman-Owens
GMAT Instructor
Veritas Prep

Post helpful? Mosey your cursor on over to that Thank button and click, please! I will bake you an imaginary cake.
Join the discussion

by e-GMAT » Thu Jun 16, 2011 10:04 am
In both sentences, the pronoun reference is clear and there is no ambiguity associated with it.
In sentence 1, even though "wine" is a singular noun and could be a possible antecedent, logically this reference will not make sense. That is, it will not make logical sense to say - Bordeaux is a French region whose famous export is the wine that bears wine's name.

Similarly in sentence 2, it does not make sense to say that abc are attempting various experiments in an effort to retain experiments' status...

Let the meaning guide you. I suggest you view the following to gain more clarity on this concept.
Register at e-GMAT and access "Pronoun" concept. This concept is available free of charge and the example of car and tree clearly show how pronoun reference is purely contextual. Furthermore, check out the following post:
https://e-gmat.com/blogs/?p=261

Good luck for your exam.
Join the discussion

by winnerhere » Thu Jun 16, 2011 10:11 am
Ashley@VeritasPrep wrote:Hey Sai,

The good thing about SC on the GMAT is that your job is always only to pick the best option -- not to determine whether that best option is actually perfect.

Your sentences highlight the imperfect correspondence between logical clarity and grammatical clarity. Logically the pronoun referents are clear in both of your sentences, but grammatically, you're right, they're ambiguous in both cases.

Whereas a grammatical ERROR (such as a subject-verb clash or the use of a singular pronoun in reference to a plural antecedent) is NEVER okay, a grammatical *ambiguity* (which is not the same thing as an error) can be let slide oftentimes as long as the meaning is clear.

On the GMAT, if you had as options versions of these sentences that were clear not only logically but also grammatically, those would certainly be your best options. However, if no such options are present, it's likely that all the other answer choices will feature actual grammatical ERRORS, and in that case, both of these sentences will be acceptable.

Hope that helps!
Thanks a lot Ashley - it helps to me NOT to strike off any grammatically ambigous sentences on first sight.

As a strategy I will strike off the grammatically wrong sentences and just keep the ambiguous sentences for the final shoot out...a good strategy?
Join the discussion

by winnerhere » Thu Jun 16, 2011 10:36 am
e-gmat,

Thanks a lot..that was really helpful :)
Last edited by winnerhere on Thu Jun 16, 2011 11:05 am, edited 1 time in total.
Join the discussion

by Ashley@VeritasPrep » Thu Jun 16, 2011 10:51 am
winnerhere wrote:
As a strategy I will strike off the grammatically wrong sentences and just keep the ambiguous sentences for the final shoot out...a good strategy?
Yes, a very good strategy indeed!
Ashley Newman-Owens
GMAT Instructor
Veritas Prep

Post helpful? Mosey your cursor on over to that Thank button and click, please! I will bake you an imaginary cake.
Join the discussion