Live GMAT classes with Target Test Prep start Nov 21 and Nov 22. First class free.

See classes
Target Test Prep · GMAT

Choose how you want to prepare

Learn live with an expert or move at your own pace. Every option includes the complete TTP study system.

Newsweek Readers’ Choice Awards 2026 winner: Target Test Prep, #1 Test Prep

Target Test Prep was voted #1 Best Test Prep in the 2026 Newsweek Readers’ Choice™ Awards.

★★★★★5.0563 reviews
GMATLiveTeachStarts Nov 22
Josh Braslow, Target Test Prep GMAT expert
LIVE ONLINE CLASSES

Get Ready for GMAT Test Day Faster with Live Online Classes

with Josh Braslow, 20+ years in test prep

Nov 22 · Josh Braslow
Sun · 9:30 AM to 12:30 PM ET
Included
40 hours of live online classes + 6 months of TTP OnDemand
  • Attend the first class for free
  • Every class is recorded, so you never fall behind
View classes & enroll
Limited seats availableTarget Test Prep
EALiveTeachOnDemandStart anytime
EXECUTIVE ASSESSMENT

Target Test Prep EA OnDemand

Self-paced EA prep. Study on your schedule.

EXECUTIVE ASSESSMENT

with

165+ EA score guarantee
$05-day trial no automatic billing
Schedule
Included
40 hours of live online classes plus six months of access to the complete TTP EA OnDemand course.
  • 165+ EA Score Guarantee
  • 4,100+ Quant, Verbal, and Integrated Reasoning practice questions
  • 400+ hours of in-depth video lessons
  • 3,000+ step-by-step video solutions
View EA class & enroll Start free 5-day trial
Limited cohort · enrollment openTrial includes full course accessTarget Test Prep
GMATOnDemandStart anytime
SELF-PACED MASTERCLASS

Target Test Prep GMAT OnDemand

Complete access from day one. Study on your schedule.

715+ score guarantee
$0to start then $127/mo
  • Personalized study plan and analytics
  • Thousands of lessons and practice questions

princeton CR

Expert replies
by bblast » Mon Jun 20, 2011 2:55 am
Party leaders feared that the recent addition of conservative planks to the party platform would diminish the popularity of the party among younger voters. Some predicted that the number of party members younger than 25 would decline, or, at best, stay the same. This fear, though, has proven to be unfounded: of all party members, the percentage younger than 25 is higher than ever. Rather than hurt the party, conservatism has helped attract more young voters to the party.

Which of the following, if true, would most seriously weaken the author’s conclusion?


Many party leaders are uncomfortable with the political direction the party is taking, for both political and ideological reasons.

Party candidates continue to suffer defeats when running on the party platform.

The number of party members older than 25 declined significantly after the announcement of the new conservative platform.

In the last election, the ratio of voters under the age of 25 who voted for the party to all voters under the age of 25 increased.

Over half the population of potential voters under the age of 25 never vote.


OA-Later
Cheers !!

Quant 47-Striving for 50
Verbal 34-Striving for 40

My gmat journey :
https://www.beatthegmat.com/710-bblast-s ... 90735.html
My take on the GMAT RC :
https://www.beatthegmat.com/ways-to-bbla ... 90808.html
How to prepare before your MBA:
https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=upz46D7 ... TWBZF14TKW_
Join the discussion
Source: — Critical Reasoning |

by Sanjay2706 » Mon Jun 20, 2011 3:27 am
IMO C.
As it states that the percentage of people over 25 years declined, which would mean that the young population has not increased, but the older population has decreased.
Join the discussion

by mobileuser » Mon Jun 20, 2011 4:37 am
Conclusion is "conservatism has helped attract more young voters to the party". Therefore, we're looking for an option that implies young voters count have not increased or implies that the count of people older than 25 has decreased. The closest choice is c
Join the discussion

by longbyte75 » Mon Jun 20, 2011 8:35 am
+1 for C
bblast wrote:Party leaders feared that the recent addition of conservative planks to the party platform would diminish the popularity of the party among younger voters. Some predicted that the number of party members younger than 25 would decline, or, at best, stay the same. This fear, though, has proven to be unfounded: of all party members, the percentage younger than 25 is higher than ever. Rather than hurt the party, conservatism has helped attract more young voters to the party.

Which of the following, if true, would most seriously weaken the author’s conclusion?


Many party leaders are uncomfortable with the political direction the party is taking, for both political and ideological reasons. OOS

Party candidates continue to suffer defeats when running on the party platform. OOS

The number of party members older than 25 declined significantly after the announcement of the new conservative platform. Alternative cause for the rise in percentage, hence weakens

In the last election, the ratio of voters under the age of 25 who voted for the party to all voters under the age of 25 increased. Strengthens

Over half the population of potential voters under the age of 25 never vote. This do not convey if under-25 are more attracted or not.


OA-Later
Join the discussion

by bblast » Tue Jun 21, 2011 7:36 am
good work guys,,oa is indeed c. this question was good
Cheers !!

Quant 47-Striving for 50
Verbal 34-Striving for 40

My gmat journey :
https://www.beatthegmat.com/710-bblast-s ... 90735.html
My take on the GMAT RC :
https://www.beatthegmat.com/ways-to-bbla ... 90808.html
How to prepare before your MBA:
https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=upz46D7 ... TWBZF14TKW_
Join the discussion