BREAKING: Target Test Prep releases Brand New 2026 On Demand GMAT prep course

Redeem

Target Test Prep · GMAT

Choose how you want to prepare

Learn live with an expert or move at your own pace. Every option includes the complete TTP study system.

★★★★★5.0559 reviews
Vote for Target Test Prep, Newsweek Readers’ Choice Awards 2026
NEWSWEEK READERS’ CHOICE 2026

BIG NEWS! Target Test Prep has been nominated, and they’d love your vote!

TTP has worked incredibly hard to build the best test prep experience possible, and winning Newsweek’s 2026 Readers’ Choice Award for Best Test Prep would mean a lot to them. If TTP has helped you, they’d be incredibly grateful for your vote. You can vote once each day through September 9.

Vote for TTP
GMATLiveTeach 7 seats left
Chris Peckover
NEXT LIVE COHORT

Oct 13 to Jan 7, 2027

with Chris Peckover

Schedule
Tue, Thu · 8:00 to 10:00 PM ET
Included
40 live hours + 6 months of GMAT OnDemand
  • Live instruction and real-time questions
  • Class recordings and assigned practice
View class & enroll
Limited cohort · enrollment openTarget Test Prep
EALiveTeach 5 seats left
Logan Thompson
EXECUTIVE ASSESSMENT

Sep 6 to Dec 6, 2026

with Logan Thompson

Schedule
Sun · 9:30 AM to 12:30 PM ET
Included
40 hours of live online classes plus six months of access to the complete TTP EA OnDemand course.
  • 165+ EA Score Guarantee
  • 4,100+ Quant, Verbal, and Integrated Reasoning practice questions
  • 400+ hours of in-depth video lessons
  • 3,000+ step-by-step video solutions
View EA class & enroll
Limited cohort · enrollment openTarget Test Prep
GMATOnDemand Start anytime
SELF-PACED MASTERCLASS

Target Test Prep GMAT OnDemand

Complete access from day one. Study on your schedule.

715+ score guarantee
$0to start then $127/mo
  • Personalized study plan and analytics
  • Thousands of lessons and practice questions

Compare the format, schedule, and included access before enrolling. Prices and seat counts shown reflect the supplied offer details.

Overlapping Sets from GMATPrep

Expert replies
by silivest60 » Tue Nov 13, 2007 11:46 pm
I have a hard time getting the solution out of these 2 questions. I need some detailed explanations PLEASE!!!
Attachments
Overlapping Sets.doc
(142.5 KiB) Downloaded 116 times
Join the discussion
Source: — Data Sufficiency |

by camitava » Wed Nov 14, 2007 12:38 am
Hey silivest60, ur attachment is coming here! Please refer the screen-shot I have attached.
Image
Correct me If I am wrong


Regards,

Amitava
Join the discussion

sorry for the inconvenience

by silivest60 » Wed Nov 14, 2007 10:47 am
Yes, u're right Amitava! I'll load it again....
So, please anyone, I need some good solutions on these ones!!!
Thanks a lot.
:)
Attachments
Overlapping Set 2.jpg
Overlapping Set 1.jpg
Join the discussion

by moneyman » Thu Nov 15, 2007 3:24 am
Question 1 is damn tricky!!

(1) is clearly insufficient because it does not give any information about the number of people who are employed.

(2) says that among the people who are 65 or older 20% of men and 10% of women are employed.

Lets say the number of people who are 65 or older is 500 and out of that 400 are male and 100 are female.Then according to (2) 20% of 400=80 and 10% of 100=10 so 80+10=90 which is 22.5% of 500.Try plugging in any number and you will find the condition to be true.Hence B.

Is it clear??
Maxx
Join the discussion

thanks

by silivest60 » Fri Nov 16, 2007 7:54 pm
Good work moneyman,
It is cristal clear; plugging in sometimes is very helpful.
Thanks a lot!
Join the discussion

by ri2007 » Fri Nov 16, 2007 8:45 pm
i still cant seem to view the attachments....can any one help??? thanks in advance
Join the discussion

by moneyman » Fri Nov 16, 2007 8:46 pm
Ya ri2007 there seems to be a problem with the image!!
Maxx
Join the discussion

hope these are better....

by silivest60 » Sun Nov 18, 2007 6:33 pm
These shoud be better...
Attachments
Overlapping Set 2.jpg
Overlapping Set 1.jpg
Join the discussion

by ri2007 » Sun Nov 18, 2007 7:23 pm
As you already have the reply to the first question am only answering the second.

in such a case start by seeing what you have. Unfortunately we cannot draw a table but if u have access to the MGMAT word problems guide they have a great table there.

Ok,

You know total teachers (M +W) = 1400
Of which 42% consider engaging in research essential. = 0.42 (1400)
So total who dont consider it imp = 0.58 (1400)

Statement 1) 36% of men and 50% of women consider research imp

Assume total women is = W so total men = 1400 - W

Given

0.36 ( 1400- w) + 0.5 ( w) = 0.42 (1400). Since W stands for total women you have the ans

only one variable so u can ans the question

Statement 2) gives total men interested in no of men interested in research = 288

so you know no of women interested in research = (42* 1400) - 288

But with this you still cannot find the total number of women in the group. If you were given the split or the ratio of M to W as a whole or if you know the ratio of M: W in the group who were not intersted in research you could find the ans. But on its own statement 2 is insufficient

Now sure if i could explain, but hope it helps
Join the discussion

thanks

by silivest60 » Sun Nov 18, 2007 8:48 pm
I understand your explanation. Thanks a lot.
Join the discussion

by aimhigh715 » Mon Nov 19, 2007 11:11 pm
https://www.beatthegmat.com/ds-gmat-prep-t6772.html

virtually the same concept / question as in that post :D be lucky to get 2 questions on the real gmat like that eh?
Work Hard, Play Harder!
Join the discussion