Live GMAT classes with Target Test Prep start Nov 21 and Nov 22. First class free.

See classes
Target Test Prep · GMAT

Choose how you want to prepare

Learn live with an expert or move at your own pace. Every option includes the complete TTP study system.

Newsweek Readers’ Choice Awards 2026 winner: Target Test Prep, #1 Test Prep

Target Test Prep was voted #1 Best Test Prep in the 2026 Newsweek Readers’ Choice™ Awards.

★★★★★5.0563 reviews
GMATLiveTeachStarts Nov 22
Josh Braslow, Target Test Prep GMAT expert
LIVE ONLINE CLASSES

Get Ready for GMAT Test Day Faster with Live Online Classes

with Josh Braslow, 20+ years in test prep

Nov 22 · Josh Braslow
Sun · 9:30 AM to 12:30 PM ET
Included
40 hours of live online classes + 6 months of TTP OnDemand
  • Attend the first class for free
  • Every class is recorded, so you never fall behind
View classes & enroll
Limited seats availableTarget Test Prep
EALiveTeachOnDemandStart anytime
EXECUTIVE ASSESSMENT

Target Test Prep EA OnDemand

Self-paced EA prep. Study on your schedule.

EXECUTIVE ASSESSMENT

with

165+ EA score guarantee
$05-day trial no automatic billing
Schedule
Included
40 hours of live online classes plus six months of access to the complete TTP EA OnDemand course.
  • 165+ EA Score Guarantee
  • 4,100+ Quant, Verbal, and Integrated Reasoning practice questions
  • 400+ hours of in-depth video lessons
  • 3,000+ step-by-step video solutions
View EA class & enroll Start free 5-day trial
Limited cohort · enrollment openTrial includes full course accessTarget Test Prep
GMATOnDemandStart anytime
SELF-PACED MASTERCLASS

Target Test Prep GMAT OnDemand

Complete access from day one. Study on your schedule.

715+ score guarantee
$0to start then $127/mo
  • Personalized study plan and analytics
  • Thousands of lessons and practice questions

Overlapping Sets from GMATPrep

Expert replies
by silivest60 » Tue Nov 13, 2007 11:46 pm
I have a hard time getting the solution out of these 2 questions. I need some detailed explanations PLEASE!!!
You do not have the required permissions to view the files attached to this post.
Join the discussion
Source: — Data Sufficiency |

by camitava » Wed Nov 14, 2007 12:38 am
Hey silivest60, ur attachment is coming here! Please refer the screen-shot I have attached.
Image
Correct me If I am wrong


Regards,

Amitava
Join the discussion

sorry for the inconvenience

by silivest60 » Wed Nov 14, 2007 10:47 am
Yes, u're right Amitava! I'll load it again....
So, please anyone, I need some good solutions on these ones!!!
Thanks a lot.
:)
You do not have the required permissions to view the files attached to this post.
Join the discussion

by moneyman » Thu Nov 15, 2007 3:24 am
Question 1 is damn tricky!!

(1) is clearly insufficient because it does not give any information about the number of people who are employed.

(2) says that among the people who are 65 or older 20% of men and 10% of women are employed.

Lets say the number of people who are 65 or older is 500 and out of that 400 are male and 100 are female.Then according to (2) 20% of 400=80 and 10% of 100=10 so 80+10=90 which is 22.5% of 500.Try plugging in any number and you will find the condition to be true.Hence B.

Is it clear??
Maxx
Join the discussion

thanks

by silivest60 » Fri Nov 16, 2007 7:54 pm
Good work moneyman,
It is cristal clear; plugging in sometimes is very helpful.
Thanks a lot!
Join the discussion

by ri2007 » Fri Nov 16, 2007 8:45 pm
i still cant seem to view the attachments....can any one help??? thanks in advance
Join the discussion

by moneyman » Fri Nov 16, 2007 8:46 pm
Ya ri2007 there seems to be a problem with the image!!
Maxx
Join the discussion

hope these are better....

by silivest60 » Sun Nov 18, 2007 6:33 pm
These shoud be better...
You do not have the required permissions to view the files attached to this post.
Join the discussion

by ri2007 » Sun Nov 18, 2007 7:23 pm
As you already have the reply to the first question am only answering the second.

in such a case start by seeing what you have. Unfortunately we cannot draw a table but if u have access to the MGMAT word problems guide they have a great table there.

Ok,

You know total teachers (M +W) = 1400
Of which 42% consider engaging in research essential. = 0.42 (1400)
So total who dont consider it imp = 0.58 (1400)

Statement 1) 36% of men and 50% of women consider research imp

Assume total women is = W so total men = 1400 - W

Given

0.36 ( 1400- w) + 0.5 ( w) = 0.42 (1400). Since W stands for total women you have the ans

only one variable so u can ans the question

Statement 2) gives total men interested in no of men interested in research = 288

so you know no of women interested in research = (42* 1400) - 288

But with this you still cannot find the total number of women in the group. If you were given the split or the ratio of M to W as a whole or if you know the ratio of M: W in the group who were not intersted in research you could find the ans. But on its own statement 2 is insufficient

Now sure if i could explain, but hope it helps
Join the discussion

thanks

by silivest60 » Sun Nov 18, 2007 8:48 pm
I understand your explanation. Thanks a lot.
Join the discussion

by aimhigh715 » Mon Nov 19, 2007 11:11 pm
https://www.beatthegmat.com/ds-gmat-prep-t6772.html

virtually the same concept / question as in that post :D be lucky to get 2 questions on the real gmat like that eh?
Work Hard, Play Harder!
Join the discussion