BREAKING: Target Test Prep releases Brand New 2026 On Demand GMAT prep course

Redeem

Target Test Prep · GMAT

Choose how you want to prepare

Learn live with an expert or move at your own pace. Every option includes the complete TTP study system.

★★★★★5.0559 reviews
Vote for Target Test Prep, Newsweek Readers’ Choice Awards 2026
NEWSWEEK READERS’ CHOICE 2026

BIG NEWS! Target Test Prep has been nominated, and they’d love your vote!

TTP has worked incredibly hard to build the best test prep experience possible, and winning Newsweek’s 2026 Readers’ Choice Award for Best Test Prep would mean a lot to them. If TTP has helped you, they’d be incredibly grateful for your vote. You can vote once each day through September 9.

Vote for TTP
GMATLiveTeach 7 seats left
Chris Peckover
NEXT LIVE COHORT

Oct 13 to Jan 7, 2027

with Chris Peckover

Schedule
Tue, Thu · 8:00 to 10:00 PM ET
Included
40 live hours + 6 months of GMAT OnDemand
  • Live instruction and real-time questions
  • Class recordings and assigned practice
View class & enroll
Limited cohort · enrollment openTarget Test Prep
EALiveTeach 5 seats left
Logan Thompson
EXECUTIVE ASSESSMENT

Sep 6 to Dec 6, 2026

with Logan Thompson

Schedule
Sun · 9:30 AM to 12:30 PM ET
Included
40 hours of live online classes plus six months of access to the complete TTP EA OnDemand course.
  • 165+ EA Score Guarantee
  • 4,100+ Quant, Verbal, and Integrated Reasoning practice questions
  • 400+ hours of in-depth video lessons
  • 3,000+ step-by-step video solutions
View EA class & enroll
Limited cohort · enrollment openTarget Test Prep
GMATOnDemand Start anytime
SELF-PACED MASTERCLASS

Target Test Prep GMAT OnDemand

Complete access from day one. Study on your schedule.

715+ score guarantee
$0to start then $127/mo
  • Personalized study plan and analytics
  • Thousands of lessons and practice questions

Compare the format, schedule, and included access before enrolling. Prices and seat counts shown reflect the supplied offer details.

OG 12 th edition :Bussiness

Expert replies
by Acorn » Tue Aug 30, 2011 3:25 am
Source: OG 12th Ed

Businesses are suffering because of a lack of money available for development loans. To help businesses, the government plans to modify the income-tax structure in order to induce individual taxpayers to put a larger portion of their incomes into retirement savings accounts, because as more money is deposited in such accounts, more money becomes available to borrowers.

Which of the following, if true, raises the most serious doubt regarding the effectiveness of the government's plan to increase the amount of money available for development loans for businesses?

(A) When levels of personal retirement savings increase, consumer borrowing always increases correspondingly.
(B) The increased tax revenue the government would receive as a result of business expansion would not offset the loss in revenue from personal income taxes during the first year of the plan.
(C) Even with tax incentives, some people will choose not to increase their levels of retirement savings.
(D) Bankers generally will not continue to lend money to businesses whose prospective earnings are insufficient to meet their loan repayment schedules.
(E) The modified tax structure would give all taxpayers, regardless of their incomes, the same tax savings for a given increase in their retirement savings.

OA is A

I got it right but I seek explaination for -why C is incorrect.
Join the discussion
Source: — Critical Reasoning |

by GmatKiss » Tue Aug 30, 2011 5:03 am
Acorn wrote:Source: OG 12th Ed

Businesses are suffering because of a lack of money available for development loans. To help businesses, the government plans to modify the income-tax structure in order to induce individual taxpayers to put a larger portion of their incomes into retirement savings accounts, because as more money is deposited in such accounts, more money becomes available to borrowers.

Which of the following, if true, raises the most serious doubt regarding the effectiveness of the government's plan to increase the amount of money available for development loans for businesses?

(A) When levels of personal retirement savings increase, consumer borrowing always increases correspondingly.
(B) The increased tax revenue the government would receive as a result of business expansion would not offset the loss in revenue from personal income taxes during the first year of the plan.
(C) Even with tax incentives, some people will choose not to increase their levels of retirement savings. - Contender, but not serious as A
(D) Bankers generally will not continue to lend money to businesses whose prospective earnings are insufficient to meet their loan repayment schedules.
(E) The modified tax structure would give all taxpayers, regardless of their incomes, the same tax savings for a given increase in their retirement savings.

OA is A

I got it right but I seek explaination for -why C is incorrect.
C is not incorrect, it is less serious than A.

Regards,
GK
Join the discussion

by taneja.niks » Tue Aug 30, 2011 11:22 am
with C -> some people is the word some can be very less i mean may be just 5% what if 95% are gonna do it so we aren bothered abt the 5% and specially cant base our conclusion on such a small percentage.

and the author already says that with the tax incentive people will deposit more money but with C the authors point is negated that more money will be available in the accounts which is a contradiction. so C is not even a contender here....

Hope is helps
Last edited by taneja.niks on Tue Aug 30, 2011 1:16 pm, edited 1 time in total.
Join the discussion

by prateek_guy2004 » Tue Aug 30, 2011 12:50 pm
[spoiler]Well C is the only option which is doubting the authors suggestion to invite more tax and then allow it to the borrowers for the development.

Only C says that it not going to work.....

In typical flawed ques's one need a alternate cause ......which is sufficient.. [/spoiler]
Don't look for the incorrect things that you have done rather look for remedies....

https://www.beatthegmat.com/motivation-t90253.html
Join the discussion

by saketk » Fri Sep 02, 2011 2:02 pm
prateek_guy2004 wrote:Well C is the only option which is doubting the authors suggestion to invite more tax and then allow it to the borrowers for the development.

Only C says that it not going to work.....

In typical flawed ques's one need a alternate cause ......which is sufficient..
First of all, sorry for removing the spoiler from your post... Since you are posting a reason and not an answer, I thought it will be better if I reply to something which is visible.


Now, the reason option C is incorrect because first of all it talks about Tax incentives. Where in the question stem the word "Tax Incentive" is mentioned? It simply says " modify the income-tax structure" - It could mean anything. Secondly, the mention of the word "Some People". Even if this statement weakens the argument, it is doing so in a Weaker way

Whereas, if you look at Option A, it gives you a reason that Consumer borrowing will increase, leading to depletion of the funds collected through Retirement money.
Join the discussion