BREAKING: Target Test Prep releases Brand New 2026 On Demand GMAT prep course

Redeem

Target Test Prep · GMAT

Choose how you want to prepare

Learn live with an expert or move at your own pace. Every option includes the complete TTP study system.

★★★★★5.0559 reviews
Vote for Target Test Prep, Newsweek Readers’ Choice Awards 2026
NEWSWEEK READERS’ CHOICE 2026

BIG NEWS! Target Test Prep has been nominated, and they’d love your vote!

TTP has worked incredibly hard to build the best test prep experience possible, and winning Newsweek’s 2026 Readers’ Choice Award for Best Test Prep would mean a lot to them. If TTP has helped you, they’d be incredibly grateful for your vote. You can vote once each day through September 9.

Vote for TTP
GMATLiveTeach 7 seats left
Chris Peckover
NEXT LIVE COHORT

Oct 13 to Jan 7, 2027

with Chris Peckover

Schedule
Tue, Thu · 8:00 to 10:00 PM ET
Included
40 live hours + 6 months of GMAT OnDemand
  • Live instruction and real-time questions
  • Class recordings and assigned practice
View class & enroll
Limited cohort · enrollment openTarget Test Prep
EALiveTeach 5 seats left
Logan Thompson
EXECUTIVE ASSESSMENT

Sep 6 to Dec 6, 2026

with Logan Thompson

Schedule
Sun · 9:30 AM to 12:30 PM ET
Included
40 hours of live online classes plus six months of access to the complete TTP EA OnDemand course.
  • 165+ EA Score Guarantee
  • 4,100+ Quant, Verbal, and Integrated Reasoning practice questions
  • 400+ hours of in-depth video lessons
  • 3,000+ step-by-step video solutions
View EA class & enroll
Limited cohort · enrollment openTarget Test Prep
GMATOnDemand Start anytime
SELF-PACED MASTERCLASS

Target Test Prep GMAT OnDemand

Complete access from day one. Study on your schedule.

715+ score guarantee
$0to start then $127/mo
  • Personalized study plan and analytics
  • Thousands of lessons and practice questions
Start free 5-day trial
Read 559 reviewsTarget Test Prep

Compare the format, schedule, and included access before enrolling. Prices and seat counts shown reflect the supplied offer details.

Non-Stick Cookware Issue

Expert replies
Post new topic Post Reply
Previous Topic Next Topic
Master | Next Rank: 500 Posts
Posts: 239
Joined: Thu Oct 28, 2010 8:40 amFollowed by: 2 members
Location: India
Thanked: 5 times
GMAT Score:690
by Dean Jones » Sun Oct 30, 2011 12:54 pm
Hi friends,

I am having problems in solving the following problem.
Please help.

Consumer advocates argue that the coating found on non-stick cookware contains harmful chemicals that are released into the air when the cookware is heated above a certain temperature. The manufacturer of the cookware acknowledges this hazard but assures consumers that the temperature threshold is much higher than would ever be needed for food preparation and therefore no special precautions need be taken in using the cookware. Which of the following, if true, would cast the most serious doubt on the claims of the manufacturer?

"¢ The chemicals released by the coating can linger in the air for days
"¢ Empty cookware left on the flame often reaches exceptionally high temperatures.
"¢ Several consumers have already claimed illness as a result of using the cookware.
"¢ The manufacturer did not test the cookware for this phenomenon until consumer advocates brought the issue to its attention.
"¢ There are effective non-stick coatings that do not release toxins when heated.

OA after some discussions.
Top
Join the discussion
Log in to postLogin with Googleuse password
QUOTE IN REPLY
Source: — Critical Reasoning |
Junior | Next Rank: 30 Posts
Posts: 12
Joined: Sat Jul 24, 2010 11:10 am
Location: Bangalore, India
Thanked: 1 times

by yasha_gmat » Sun Oct 30, 2011 9:26 pm
"¢ The chemicals released by the coating can linger in the air for days
Does not refute the manufacturers claim. The manufacturer agrees that chemical is released in air. How long it lingers is not something the argument talks about.
"¢ Empty cookware left on the flame often reaches exceptionally high temperatures.
CORRECT. This statement calls into question the following statement made by the manufacturer "temperature threshold is much higher than would ever be needed for food preparation"
"¢ Several consumers have already claimed illness as a result of using the cookware.
This could be because of anything. Not necessarily due to the chemical in question.
"¢ The manufacturer did not test the cookware for this phenomenon until consumer advocates brought the issue to its attention.
Not related to the argument in question
"¢ There are effective non-stick coatings that do not release toxins when heated.
Not related to the argument in question
Top
Join the discussion
Log in to postLogin with Googleuse password
QUOTE IN REPLY
User avatar
Senior | Next Rank: 100 Posts
Posts: 37
Joined: Tue Jun 14, 2011 11:24 amFollowed by: 5 members
Thanked: 1 times

by mir.yahya » Mon Oct 31, 2011 6:43 am
IMO = Option B

Explanation:
Manufacturer claims that temperature threshold is much higher than would be ever needed and only option B refutes it the closest among the options.
Top
Join the discussion
Log in to postLogin with Googleuse password
QUOTE IN REPLY
Newbie | Next Rank: 10 Posts
Posts: 4
Joined: Fri Feb 06, 2009 1:43 am

by sandipsharma1 » Wed Nov 02, 2011 7:14 am
What is OA?

IMO C.

The issue with B is that although it says "exceptionally high temperatures", it fails to mention if the high temperature is greater than the threshold temperature. We have to assume that this is the case, which i believe is to much to assume.

Whereas, C clearly cites some instances of consumers already claiming illness as a result of using the cookware. Some would argue that the illness could be because of some other reason, but then we cannot question the facts stated in premises and answer choices.

Pls comment..
Top
Join the discussion
Log in to postLogin with Googleuse password
QUOTE IN REPLY
Legendary Member
Posts: 627
Joined: Thu Jun 23, 2011 9:12 amFollowed by: 1 member
Thanked: 4 times

by mankey » Wed Nov 02, 2011 7:57 am
The debate has to involve temperature in this since that will decide if the non-stick will release toxic substance or not.

It is clearly B. Please provide OA.

Thanks.
Top
Join the discussion
Log in to postLogin with Googleuse password
QUOTE IN REPLY
Master | Next Rank: 500 Posts
Posts: 416
Joined: Thu Jul 28, 2011 12:48 amFollowed by: 6 members
Thanked: 28 times

by gunjan1208 » Thu Nov 03, 2011 10:46 pm
Its B as it attacks the right place.
Top
Join the discussion
Log in to postLogin with Googleuse password
QUOTE IN REPLY
User avatar
Legendary Member
Posts: 1239
Joined: Tue Apr 26, 2011 6:25 amFollowed by: 26 members
Thanked: 233 times
GMAT Score:680

by sam2304 » Fri Nov 04, 2011 12:04 am
IMO B.

B directly attacks the conclusion.
Getting defeated is just a temporary notion, giving it up is what makes it permanent.
https://gmatandbeyond.blogspot.in/
Top
Join the discussion
Log in to postLogin with Googleuse password
QUOTE IN REPLY
Master | Next Rank: 500 Posts
Posts: 150
Joined: Thu May 05, 2011 10:04 amFollowed by: 4 members
Thanked: 5 times

by thestartupguy » Fri Nov 04, 2011 10:43 am
Even I feel the answer is B. The option C is close
Top
Join the discussion
Log in to postLogin with Googleuse password
QUOTE IN REPLY
User avatar
Community Manager
Posts: 1060
Joined: Fri May 13, 2011 6:46 amFollowed by: 52 members
Location: Utrecht, The Netherlands
Thanked: 318 times

by neelgandham » Fri Nov 04, 2011 12:04 pm
temperature threshold is much higher than would ever be needed for food preparation and therefore no special precautions need be taken in using the cookware. is the claim

and B is the definitive answer !
"¢ Empty cookware left on the flame often reaches exceptionally high temperatures.
Anil Gandham
Welcome to BEATtheGMAT | Photography | Getting Started | BTG Community rules | MBA Watch
Check out GMAT Prep Now's online course at https://www.gmatprepnow.com/
Top
Join the discussion
Log in to postLogin with Googleuse password
QUOTE IN REPLY
Post new topic Post Reply
• Page 1 of 1