BREAKING: Target Test Prep releases Brand New 2026 On Demand GMAT prep course

Redeem

Target Test Prep · GMAT

Choose how you want to prepare

Learn live with an expert or move at your own pace. Every option includes the complete TTP study system.

★★★★★5.0559 reviews
Vote for Target Test Prep, Newsweek Readers’ Choice Awards 2026
NEWSWEEK READERS’ CHOICE 2026

BIG NEWS! Target Test Prep has been nominated, and they’d love your vote!

TTP has worked incredibly hard to build the best test prep experience possible, and winning Newsweek’s 2026 Readers’ Choice Award for Best Test Prep would mean a lot to them. If TTP has helped you, they’d be incredibly grateful for your vote. You can vote once each day through September 9.

Vote for TTP
GMATLiveTeach 7 seats left
Chris Peckover
NEXT LIVE COHORT

Oct 13 to Jan 7, 2027

with Chris Peckover

Schedule
Tue, Thu · 8:00 to 10:00 PM ET
Included
40 live hours + 6 months of GMAT OnDemand
  • Live instruction and real-time questions
  • Class recordings and assigned practice
View class & enroll
Limited cohort · enrollment openTarget Test Prep
EALiveTeach 5 seats left
Logan Thompson
EXECUTIVE ASSESSMENT

Sep 6 to Dec 6, 2026

with Logan Thompson

Schedule
Sun · 9:30 AM to 12:30 PM ET
Included
40 hours of live online classes plus six months of access to the complete TTP EA OnDemand course.
  • 165+ EA Score Guarantee
  • 4,100+ Quant, Verbal, and Integrated Reasoning practice questions
  • 400+ hours of in-depth video lessons
  • 3,000+ step-by-step video solutions
View EA class & enroll
Limited cohort · enrollment openTarget Test Prep
GMATOnDemand Start anytime
SELF-PACED MASTERCLASS

Target Test Prep GMAT OnDemand

Complete access from day one. Study on your schedule.

715+ score guarantee
$0to start then $127/mo
  • Personalized study plan and analytics
  • Thousands of lessons and practice questions

Compare the format, schedule, and included access before enrolling. Prices and seat counts shown reflect the supplied offer details.

mgmat sc-parents

Expert replies
by pradeepkaushal9518 » Tue Jul 13, 2010 2:51 am
Elderly patients, many who take expensive brand-name medications daily, could reduce their medical costs by switching to generic drugs and making lifestyle changes.

many who
many of them who
and many of them who
many of whom
many of which
Join the discussion
Source: — Sentence Correction |

by kvcpk » Tue Jul 13, 2010 3:02 am
many of whom

IMO D
Join the discussion

by adi_800 » Tue Jul 13, 2010 7:31 am
Now it seems that Manhattan has too started copy pasting questions from OG...
Was nt expecting this from Manhattan...
Same question..subject changed..same concept.. Question present in OG11.
These kinda questions in the tests raise the score of the exam taker and do not represent the actual level....
:(
Join the discussion

by paes » Tue Jul 13, 2010 8:28 am
IMO C

OA please ??
Join the discussion

by pradeepkaushal9518 » Tue Jul 13, 2010 10:51 am
adi 800 whatever it may be mangattan is for Gmat and og is bible for Gmat so its good that it is clearing the concept of question in the bible( og). i think u should reply the question rather criticizing Manhattan's strategy. do u know kaplan takeover manhattan now u will face kaplan questions in manhattan tests
Join the discussion

by pradeepkaushal9518 » Tue Jul 13, 2010 11:02 am
paes what happened to u? plz conc on your verbal part else u will come down to my level of score. i want to know what is yr current level. i m still beetween 500 to 600 level.

praveen plz tell why u have not choosen B?
Join the discussion

by kvcpk » Tue Jul 13, 2010 11:09 am
pradeepkaushal9518 wrote: praveen plz tell why u have not choosen B?
in "many of them who" - them and who are redundant. Both are referring back to elderly patients which is unnecessary.
Join the discussion

by paes » Tue Jul 13, 2010 5:27 pm
pradeepkaushal9518 wrote:paes what happened to u? plz conc on your verbal part else u will come down to my level of score. i want to know what is yr current level. i m still beetween 500 to 600 level.

praveen plz tell why u have not choosen B?
well said Pradeep.

Actually I was going to select D but it was looking wordy to me.
See :
Elderly patients, many of whom take <>
can be written more effectively by
Elderly patients, who take <>

So I thought D is wordy/redundant.

Then I scanned the other choices. C was making some sense
Elderly patients, and many of them who take expensive brand-name medications daily, could reduce their medical costs by switching to generic drugs and making lifestyle changes.

Here I am seeing two groups
1. Elderly patients AND
2. many of them who take expensive brand-name

So I selected C.
Join the discussion

by paes » Tue Jul 13, 2010 5:37 pm
OA is D.
https://www.beatthegmat.com/manhatan-sc-5-t8709.html

But I don't agree with OA.
D is equivalent to:

Elderly patients, many of them(whom) take expensive brand-name medications daily, could reduce their medical costs by switching to generic drugs and making lifestyle changes.

from the meaning, the sentence should be -> elders (who take expansive drugs c) .could reduce .....

' who take expansive drugs' is necessary for the right meaning but D is putting it like an extra info.
Join the discussion

by kvcpk » Tue Jul 13, 2010 8:08 pm
paes wrote: Actually I was going to select D but it was looking wordy to me.
See :
Elderly patients, many of whom take <>
can be written more effectively by
Elderly patients, who take <>

So I thought D is wordy/redundant.
Hi Paes,

The meaning of both the sentences above is different.
The first sentence says many of the elderly patients. (NOT ALL)
Second says Elderly Patients (means ALL)

Hope this helps!!
Join the discussion

by paes » Wed Jul 14, 2010 1:37 am
kvcp,

You are wrong here.

When we say :

Elderly patients, who take expensive brand-name medications daily, could reduce their medical costs by switching to generic drugs and making lifestyle changes.

We are talking only about those patients who take expensive medicines.

See the similar example :

People who speak two languages are called bilingual. [ https://www.englishlanguageguide.com/eng ... ronoun.asp ]

that's why I selected C over D.
I found no grammatical mistake with C,
Join the discussion

by kvcpk » Wed Jul 14, 2010 2:21 am
paes wrote:When we say :

Elderly patients, who take expensive brand-name medications daily, could reduce their medical costs by switching to generic drugs and making lifestyle changes.

We are talking only about those patients who take expensive medicines.
You are right about your example. But the intended meaning of the sentence is different.

"We are talking only about those patients who take expensive medicines." is WRONG
The original sentence is not speaking about those patients who take expensive medicines.

It is infact speaking about all elderly patients. It is just giving us additional information that many of them take expensive medicines.

Hope this helps. Let me know in case you need more info.
Join the discussion

by Shawshank » Wed Jul 14, 2010 2:28 am
paes wrote:kvcp,

You are wrong here.

When we say :

Elderly patients, who take expensive brand-name medications daily, could reduce their medical costs by switching to generic drugs and making lifestyle changes.

We are talking only about those patients who take expensive medicines.

See the similar example :

People who speak two languages are called bilingual. [ https://www.englishlanguageguide.com/eng ... ronoun.asp ]

that's why I selected C over D.
I found no grammatical mistake with C,
In this case,,, Does'nt WHO represent Elderly Parents (Subject),,,,
Is'nt WHOM wrong in this context..
++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++
Shawshank Redemtion -- Hope is still alive ...
Join the discussion

by paes » Wed Jul 14, 2010 2:31 am
Read my post above. I am not convinced with the OA-D.
C looks better to me, at leas no grammar mistake.
Join the discussion

by pradeepkaushal9518 » Wed Jul 14, 2010 2:48 am
paes i dont no why whom doest not look correct to me so i have choosen " many of them who" and u are saying " and many of them who".

why u have choosen C not B ( or why and is required here)
Join the discussion