Live GMAT classes with Target Test Prep start Nov 21 and Nov 22. First class free.

See classes
Target Test Prep · GMAT

Choose how you want to prepare

Learn live with an expert or move at your own pace. Every option includes the complete TTP study system.

Newsweek Readers’ Choice Awards 2026 winner: Target Test Prep, #1 Test Prep

Target Test Prep was voted #1 Best Test Prep in the 2026 Newsweek Readers’ Choice™ Awards.

★★★★★5.0563 reviews
GMATLiveTeachStarts Nov 1
Josh Braslow, Target Test Prep GMAT expert
LIVE ONLINE CLASSES

Get Ready for GMAT Test Day Faster with Live Online Classes

with Josh Braslow, 20+ years in test prep

Nov 1 · Josh Braslow
Sun · 1:00 to 4:00 PM ET
Nov 22 · Josh Braslow
Sun · 9:30 AM to 12:30 PM ET
Included
40 hours of live online classes + 6 months of TTP OnDemand
  • Attend the first class for free
  • Every class is recorded, so you never fall behind
View classes & enroll
Limited seats availableTarget Test Prep
EALiveTeachOnDemand5 seats leftStart anytime
EXECUTIVE ASSESSMENT

Target Test Prep EA OnDemand

Self-paced EA prep. Study on your schedule.

Logan Thompson
EXECUTIVE ASSESSMENT

Sep 6 to Dec 6, 2026

with Logan Thompson

165+ EA score guarantee
$05-day trial no automatic billing
Schedule
Sun · 9:30 AM to 12:30 PM ET
Included
40 hours of live online classes plus six months of access to the complete TTP EA OnDemand course.
  • 165+ EA Score Guarantee
  • 4,100+ Quant, Verbal, and Integrated Reasoning practice questions
  • 400+ hours of in-depth video lessons
  • 3,000+ step-by-step video solutions
View EA class & enroll Start free 5-day trial
Limited cohort · enrollment openTrial includes full course accessTarget Test Prep
GMATOnDemandStart anytime
SELF-PACED MASTERCLASS

Target Test Prep GMAT OnDemand

Complete access from day one. Study on your schedule.

715+ score guarantee
$0to start then $127/mo
  • Personalized study plan and analytics
  • Thousands of lessons and practice questions

Compare the format, schedule, and included access before enrolling. Prices and seat counts shown reflect the supplied offer details.

mgmat sc - joining 2 clauses

Expert replies
by vikram4689 » Tue Jul 17, 2012 4:06 am
MGMAT SC says "if you join 2 clauses with and, you can put an optional comma before the and."
I think "comma" is imperative. Can anyone give an instance where it is optional[/img]
Premise: If you like my post
Conclusion : Press the Thanks Button ;)
Join the discussion
Source: — Sentence Correction |

by Kasia@EconomistGMAT » Tue Jul 17, 2012 4:33 am
When joining only two clauses separated with the conjunction AND, a comma is OPTIONAL. It can be omitted when there isn't a new subject.
However, using a comma in such sentences is ALWAYS correct so it is better to use one, if you are not sure, whether you should include it.
Kasia
Senior Instructor
Master GMAT - the #1 rated GMAT course

• If you found my post helpful, please click the "thank" button and/or follow me.

• Take a 7 day free trial and find out why Economist GMAT is the highest rated GMAT course - https://gmat.economist.com/

• Read GMAT Economist reviews - https://reviews.beatthegmat.com/economis ... mat-course
Join the discussion

by shekhar.kataria » Tue Jul 17, 2012 4:50 am
Hi Vikram

Can you please tell me which version of MGMAT you are using and which page has this below quoted info.

As far as MGMAT is concerned, it says in the punctuation section that "DO NOT USE A COMMA BEFORE AND TO SEPERATE TWO VERBS THAT HAVE THE SAME SUBJECT"

However, in the case you are mentioning,I too think that there should be a comma and a conjunction to join two clauses. Can you tell the page number of MGMAT book where it says the same.
vikram4689 wrote:MGMAT SC says "if you join 2 clauses with and, you can put an optional comma before the and."
I think "comma" is imperative. Can anyone give an instance where it is optional[/img]
Restlessness and discontent are the first necessities of progress.--Thomas A. Edison

If you find this post helpful, let me know by clicking thanks above :-)
Join the discussion

by vikram4689 » Tue Jul 17, 2012 6:40 am
Kasia@MasterGMAT wrote:When joining only two clauses separated with the conjunction AND, a comma is OPTIONAL. It can be omitted when there isn't a new subject.
However, using a comma in such sentences is ALWAYS correct so it is better to use one, if you are not sure, whether you should include it.
@Kasia: OG-12 Q.137 uses the comma while joining 2 relative clauses. Both of these are NOT independent clauses then why ",BUT" is used to separate them

@shekhar: It is in PARALLELISM chapter in 4th ed.
Premise: If you like my post
Conclusion : Press the Thanks Button ;)
Join the discussion

by avik.ch » Wed Jul 18, 2012 9:32 pm
vikram4689 wrote: OG-12 Q.137 uses the comma while joining 2 relative clauses. Both of these are NOT independent clauses then why ",BUT" is used to separate them
When we are joining two clause we have to use a comma. The two clause can be dependent or independent. In OG-12 #137, the since both are clause they are joined by a comma.

Refer this : https://www.beatthegmat.com/usage-of-and ... tml#479906

relative clauses are adjectives, modifying nouns, hence don't need a comma. We need a comma when we want it as a non-essential modifier.

The child who was playing on the field is my brother. - here "who was playing on the field" is a relative clause so we don't need a comma.

Hope this helps !!
Join the discussion

by mv12 » Wed Jul 18, 2012 9:44 pm
Kasia@MasterGMAT wrote:When joining only two clauses separated with the conjunction AND, a comma is OPTIONAL. It can be omitted when there isn't a new subject.
However, using a comma in such sentences is ALWAYS correct so it is better to use one, if you are not sure, whether you should include it.
Kasia can you pls provide one example of It can be omitted when there isn't a new subject.
Join the discussion