Live GMAT classes with Target Test Prep start Nov 21 and Nov 22. First class free.

See classes
Target Test Prep · GMAT

Choose how you want to prepare

Learn live with an expert or move at your own pace. Every option includes the complete TTP study system.

Newsweek Readers’ Choice Awards 2026 winner: Target Test Prep, #1 Test Prep

Target Test Prep was voted #1 Best Test Prep in the 2026 Newsweek Readers’ Choice™ Awards.

★★★★★5.0563 reviews
GMATLiveTeachStarts Nov 22
Josh Braslow, Target Test Prep GMAT expert
LIVE ONLINE CLASSES

Get Ready for GMAT Test Day Faster with Live Online Classes

with Josh Braslow, 20+ years in test prep

Nov 22 · Josh Braslow
Sun · 9:30 AM to 12:30 PM ET
Included
40 hours of live online classes + 6 months of TTP OnDemand
  • Attend the first class for free
  • Every class is recorded, so you never fall behind
View classes & enroll
Limited seats availableTarget Test Prep
EALiveTeachOnDemandStart anytime
EXECUTIVE ASSESSMENT

Target Test Prep EA OnDemand

Self-paced EA prep. Study on your schedule.

EXECUTIVE ASSESSMENT

with

165+ EA score guarantee
$05-day trial no automatic billing
Schedule
Included
40 hours of live online classes plus six months of access to the complete TTP EA OnDemand course.
  • 165+ EA Score Guarantee
  • 4,100+ Quant, Verbal, and Integrated Reasoning practice questions
  • 400+ hours of in-depth video lessons
  • 3,000+ step-by-step video solutions
View EA class & enroll Start free 5-day trial
Limited cohort · enrollment openTrial includes full course accessTarget Test Prep
GMATOnDemandStart anytime
SELF-PACED MASTERCLASS

Target Test Prep GMAT OnDemand

Complete access from day one. Study on your schedule.

715+ score guarantee
$0to start then $127/mo
  • Personalized study plan and analytics
  • Thousands of lessons and practice questions

MGMAT CAT 6--Antipsychotic drugs

Expert replies
by prachich1987 » Sat Feb 05, 2011 10:21 am
Antoine: The alarming fact is that among children aged 19 years and younger, the number taking antipsychotic medicines soared 73 percent in the last four years. That is greater than the increase in the number of adults taking antipsychotic medicines during the same period.

Lucy: But the use of antipsychotic drugs by adults is considered normal at the current rate of 11 adults per 1,000 taking the drugs. In contrast, the number of children on antipsychotic medication last year was 6.6 per 1,000 children.

Lucy’s argument is structured to lead to which of the following as a conclusion?

A) The current level of antipsychotic drug use in children is abnormally high.

B) The fact that the number of children taking antipsychotic medicines increased 73 percent over the last four years is not an indication that the current level of use is abnormally high.

C) If only 6.6 out of every 1,000 children are taking an antipsychotic medication, the increase in the use of such medicines cannot be the percentage Antoine cites.

D) It is unlikely that the increase in the use of antipsychotic medicines by children will continue at the same rate.

E)If the number of children taking antipsychotic drugs is given as a certain number, the actual rate of such drug use is even higher.
Thanks!
Prachi
Join the discussion
Source: — Critical Reasoning |

by jaxis » Sat Feb 05, 2011 10:26 am
B IMO.

Percentage increase does not give the actual percentage of people taking Medicine.
Join the discussion

by RACHVIK » Sat Feb 05, 2011 4:00 pm
IMO C.. Whats the OA.

This option seems close as Lucy intends to refute Antoine argument. Antoine anyways does not conclude if rate is high. He merely states facts.
Rachvik
Join the discussion

by cyrwr1 » Sat Feb 05, 2011 5:23 pm
I'm going to say B as a increase of 73% can mean nothing if last year the rate was say.... 3 per every 1000.

Hence, I'm confident with my answer B.
Join the discussion

by nayanikapawar » Sat Feb 05, 2011 9:47 pm
i go with B .. whts yhe OA
Join the discussion

by prachich1987 » Sun Feb 06, 2011 6:30 am
The OA is B
Thanks!
Prachi
Join the discussion