BREAKING: Target Test Prep releases Brand New 2026 On Demand GMAT prep course

Redeem

Target Test Prep · GMAT

Choose how you want to prepare

Learn live with an expert or move at your own pace. Every option includes the complete TTP study system.

★★★★★5.0559 reviews
Vote for Target Test Prep, Newsweek Readers’ Choice Awards 2026
NEWSWEEK READERS’ CHOICE 2026

BIG NEWS! Target Test Prep has been nominated, and they’d love your vote!

TTP has worked incredibly hard to build the best test prep experience possible, and winning Newsweek’s 2026 Readers’ Choice Award for Best Test Prep would mean a lot to them. If TTP has helped you, they’d be incredibly grateful for your vote. You can vote once each day through September 9.

Vote for TTP
GMATLiveTeach 7 seats left
Chris Peckover
NEXT LIVE COHORT

Oct 13 to Jan 7, 2027

with Chris Peckover

Schedule
Tue, Thu · 8:00 to 10:00 PM ET
Included
40 live hours + 6 months of GMAT OnDemand
  • Live instruction and real-time questions
  • Class recordings and assigned practice
View class & enroll
Limited cohort · enrollment openTarget Test Prep
EALiveTeach 5 seats left
Logan Thompson
EXECUTIVE ASSESSMENT

Sep 6 to Dec 6, 2026

with Logan Thompson

Schedule
Sun · 9:30 AM to 12:30 PM ET
Included
40 hours of live online classes plus six months of access to the complete TTP EA OnDemand course.
  • 165+ EA Score Guarantee
  • 4,100+ Quant, Verbal, and Integrated Reasoning practice questions
  • 400+ hours of in-depth video lessons
  • 3,000+ step-by-step video solutions
View EA class & enroll
Limited cohort · enrollment openTarget Test Prep
GMATOnDemand Start anytime
SELF-PACED MASTERCLASS

Target Test Prep GMAT OnDemand

Complete access from day one. Study on your schedule.

715+ score guarantee
$0to start then $127/mo
  • Personalized study plan and analytics
  • Thousands of lessons and practice questions

Compare the format, schedule, and included access before enrolling. Prices and seat counts shown reflect the supplied offer details.

Mc Graw Hill Test -3 CR2

Expert replies
by neha.patni » Mon Jul 19, 2010 3:24 am
A study by a group of dentists has concluded that regular use of a certain brand of mouthwash is as effective as flossing in preventing gum disease. The mouthwash company has released a television ad suggesting that people who do not like flossing can now rely solely on mouthwash and brushing to maintain good dental health. A leading manufacturer of dental floss brought a lawsuit against the mouthwash company demanding that the advertisement be discontinued on the grounds that it is misleading.

Which of the following, if true, most supports the mouthwash company's defense that its advertisement promotes greater public health?

A. Since the dental floss company is protesting the advertisement only to protect its own economic self-interest, it
cannot be seen as representing greater public health.
B. Greater public health is best served if people use both mouthwash and dental floss, a combination that has been shown
to be more effective than either method used alone.
C. Many people object to flossing because it is painful and causes their gums to bleed.
D. Since, on average, people are twice as likely to use mouthwash regularly as to floss regularly, the advertisement will increase the number of people who take effective action against gum disease, a serious public health problem.
E. Gum disease has been proven to have links with the early onset of heart disease, one of the top three threats to public health in terms of mortality.m
Join the discussion
Source: — Critical Reasoning |

by gmatmachoman » Mon Jul 19, 2010 3:29 am
Join the discussion

by sumanr84 » Mon Jul 19, 2010 3:51 am
[spoiler]IMO:D[/spoiler]
Join the discussion

by reply2spg » Mon Jul 19, 2010 1:32 pm
IMO C. D says that advertisement will get benefited, what about people. Advertisement is clearly misleading people. On the other hand if mouthwash company somehow shows that people only object to flossing, because of this this reason then it is not a misleading to people, since it is a fact. Therefore, I think C is correct answer here.
neha.patni wrote:A study by a group of dentists has concluded that regular use of a certain brand of mouthwash is as effective as flossing in preventing gum disease. The mouthwash company has released a television ad suggesting that people who do not like flossing can now rely solely on mouthwash and brushing to maintain good dental health. A leading manufacturer of dental floss brought a lawsuit against the mouthwash company demanding that the advertisement be discontinued on the grounds that it is misleading.

Which of the following, if true, most supports the mouthwash company's defense that its advertisement promotes greater public health?

A. Since the dental floss company is protesting the advertisement only to protect its own economic self-interest, it
cannot be seen as representing greater public health.
B. Greater public health is best served if people use both mouthwash and dental floss, a combination that has been shown
to be more effective than either method used alone.
C. Many people object to flossing because it is painful and causes their gums to bleed.
D. Since, on average, people are twice as likely to use mouthwash regularly as to floss regularly, the advertisement will increase the number of people who take effective action against gum disease, a serious public health problem.
E. Gum disease has been proven to have links with the early onset of heart disease, one of the top three threats to public health in terms of mortality.m
Sudhanshu
(have lot of things to learn from all of you)
Join the discussion

by debmalya_dutta » Mon Jul 19, 2010 7:45 pm
Is the answer D?
Join the discussion

by paes » Mon Jul 19, 2010 9:13 pm
IMO D
Join the discussion

by abhigang » Tue Jul 20, 2010 8:19 am
IMO D
Join the discussion

by reply2spg » Wed Jul 21, 2010 9:40 am
What is OA????

neha.patni wrote:A study by a group of dentists has concluded that regular use of a certain brand of mouthwash is as effective as flossing in preventing gum disease. The mouthwash company has released a television ad suggesting that people who do not like flossing can now rely solely on mouthwash and brushing to maintain good dental health. A leading manufacturer of dental floss brought a lawsuit against the mouthwash company demanding that the advertisement be discontinued on the grounds that it is misleading.

Which of the following, if true, most supports the mouthwash company's defense that its advertisement promotes greater public health?

A. Since the dental floss company is protesting the advertisement only to protect its own economic self-interest, it
cannot be seen as representing greater public health.
B. Greater public health is best served if people use both mouthwash and dental floss, a combination that has been shown
to be more effective than either method used alone.
C. Many people object to flossing because it is painful and causes their gums to bleed.
D. Since, on average, people are twice as likely to use mouthwash regularly as to floss regularly, the advertisement will increase the number of people who take effective action against gum disease, a serious public health problem.
E. Gum disease has been proven to have links with the early onset of heart disease, one of the top three threats to public health in terms of mortality.m
Sudhanshu
(have lot of things to learn from all of you)
Join the discussion

by brijesh » Wed Jul 21, 2010 12:49 pm
neha.patni wrote:A study by a group of dentists has concluded that regular use of a certain brand of mouthwash is as effective as flossing in preventing gum disease. The mouthwash company has released a television ad suggesting that people who do not like flossing can now rely solely on mouthwash and brushing to maintain good dental health. A leading manufacturer of dental floss brought a lawsuit against the mouthwash company demanding that the advertisement be discontinued on the grounds that it is misleading.

Which of the following, if true, most supports the mouthwash company's defense that its advertisement promotes greater public health?

A. Since the dental floss company is protesting the advertisement only to protect its own economic self-interest, it
cannot be seen as representing greater public health.
B. Greater public health is best served if people use both mouthwash and dental floss, a combination that has been shown
to be more effective than either method used alone.
C. Many people object to flossing because it is painful and causes their gums to bleed.
D. Since, on average, people are twice as likely to use mouthwash regularly as to floss regularly, the advertisement will increase the number of people who take effective action against gum disease, a serious public health problem.
I will go for option-D

E. Gum disease has been proven to have links with the early onset of heart disease, one of the top three threats to public health in terms of mortality.m
Join the discussion

by hero » Wed Jul 21, 2010 2:37 pm
the stimulus discuss a specific group of people: "people who do not like flossing". it does not describe people as a whole ( ie anyone ).

we need an answer that supports ( strengthens ) the mouthwash company's defense that it is promoting greater public health.

answer C addresses this specific group and supports the arguement.
reply2spg wrote:IMO C. D says that advertisement will get benefited, what about people. Advertisement is clearly misleading people. On the other hand if mouthwash company somehow shows that people only object to flossing, because of this this reason then it is not a misleading to people, since it is a fact. Therefore, I think C is correct answer here.
neha.patni wrote:A study by a group of dentists has concluded that regular use of a certain brand of mouthwash is as effective as flossing in preventing gum disease. The mouthwash company has released a television ad suggesting that people who do not like flossing can now rely solely on mouthwash and brushing to maintain good dental health. A leading manufacturer of dental floss brought a lawsuit against the mouthwash company demanding that the advertisement be discontinued on the grounds that it is misleading.

Which of the following, if true, most supports the mouthwash company's defense that its advertisement promotes greater public health?

A. Since the dental floss company is protesting the advertisement only to protect its own economic self-interest, it
cannot be seen as representing greater public health.
B. Greater public health is best served if people use both mouthwash and dental floss, a combination that has been shown
to be more effective than either method used alone.
C. Many people object to flossing because it is painful and causes their gums to bleed.
D. Since, on average, people are twice as likely to use mouthwash regularly as to floss regularly, the advertisement will increase the number of people who take effective action against gum disease, a serious public health problem.
E. Gum disease has been proven to have links with the early onset of heart disease, one of the top three threats to public health in terms of mortality.m
Last edited by hero on Thu Jul 22, 2010 8:15 am, edited 1 time in total.
Join the discussion

by pradeepkaushal9518 » Wed Jul 21, 2010 10:34 pm
i think its D only

most supports the mouthwash company's defense

A. no as flossing is related to gum health also hence we cannot neglect public health-doest not support anybody
B. both method then it supports both the company not only to mouthwash
C.though flossing is painful but it is in favour of public health. there are many treatments are there those are painful but still is under practice. so painful of floss doest not support the mouthwash company's defence.
D. since mouthwash company is concerned for flossing and also to gum dieases and its argue is correct that people can mouthwash twice a day than flossing regularly hence it giving a solution for this problem.

this most supports the mouthwash company's defence than flossing company's

E.out of scope.
Join the discussion

by FightWithGMAT » Thu Jul 22, 2010 12:43 pm
neha.patni wrote:A study by a group of dentists has concluded that regular use of a certain brand of mouthwash is as effective as flossing in preventing gum disease. The mouthwash company has released a television ad suggesting that people who do not like flossing can now rely solely on mouthwash and brushing to maintain good dental health. A leading manufacturer of dental floss brought a lawsuit against the mouthwash company demanding that the advertisement be discontinued on the grounds that it is misleading.

Which of the following, if true, most supports the mouthwash company's defense that its advertisement promotes greater public health?

A. Since the dental floss company is protesting the advertisement only to protect its own economic self-interest, it
cannot be seen as representing greater public health.
B. Greater public health is best served if people use both mouthwash and dental floss, a combination that has been shown
to be more effective than either method used alone.
C. Many people object to flossing because it is painful and causes their gums to bleed.
D. Since, on average, people are twice as likely to use mouthwash regularly as to floss regularly, the advertisement will increase the number of people who take effective action against gum disease, a serious public health problem.
E. Gum disease has been proven to have links with the early onset of heart disease, one of the top three threats to public health in terms of mortality.m
IMO C.

The argument does not talk about cures of gum diseases. It talks about the prevention of the gum diseases.
Maintaining good public health should be preventing the gum diseases.

Now the advertisement by the mouthwash company assumes that there are people who do not use floss.
The floss company says that the ad is misleading because such people do not exist.

C says that yes there are such people and gives a ground to the mouthwash company to defend itself.
Join the discussion

by adi_800 » Sun Jul 25, 2010 9:12 am
I too went for D...

D talks about serious public health problem. C talks about flossing but does not talk about serious health problem...
Join the discussion

by sandysai » Sun Jul 25, 2010 9:31 am
Hi Guys,

What is OA?

I feel the answer is C - Mouthwash compnay aid states"suggesting that people who do not like flossing "

So for adverstising company to defend , it emphasise on the valid reasons why the flossing is not opted,i.e
"Many people object to flossing because it is painful and causes their gums to bleed."
Join the discussion

by indiantiger » Sun Jul 25, 2010 10:40 am
IMO : D

C does not answer the question about misleading
"Single Malt is better than Blended"
Join the discussion