BREAKING: Target Test Prep releases Brand New 2026 On Demand GMAT prep course

Redeem

Target Test Prep · GMAT

Choose how you want to prepare

Learn live with an expert or move at your own pace. Every option includes the complete TTP study system.

★★★★★5.0559 reviews
Vote for Target Test Prep, Newsweek Readers’ Choice Awards 2026
NEWSWEEK READERS’ CHOICE 2026

BIG NEWS! Target Test Prep has been nominated, and they’d love your vote!

TTP has worked incredibly hard to build the best test prep experience possible, and winning Newsweek’s 2026 Readers’ Choice Award for Best Test Prep would mean a lot to them. If TTP has helped you, they’d be incredibly grateful for your vote. You can vote once each day through September 9.

Vote for TTP
GMATLiveTeach 7 seats left
Chris Peckover
NEXT LIVE COHORT

Oct 13 to Jan 7, 2027

with Chris Peckover

Schedule
Tue, Thu · 8:00 to 10:00 PM ET
Included
40 live hours + 6 months of GMAT OnDemand
  • Live instruction and real-time questions
  • Class recordings and assigned practice
View class & enroll
Limited cohort · enrollment openTarget Test Prep
EALiveTeach 5 seats left
Logan Thompson
EXECUTIVE ASSESSMENT

Sep 6 to Dec 6, 2026

with Logan Thompson

Schedule
Sun · 9:30 AM to 12:30 PM ET
Included
40 hours of live online classes plus six months of access to the complete TTP EA OnDemand course.
  • 165+ EA Score Guarantee
  • 4,100+ Quant, Verbal, and Integrated Reasoning practice questions
  • 400+ hours of in-depth video lessons
  • 3,000+ step-by-step video solutions
View EA class & enroll
Limited cohort · enrollment openTarget Test Prep
GMATOnDemand Start anytime
SELF-PACED MASTERCLASS

Target Test Prep GMAT OnDemand

Complete access from day one. Study on your schedule.

715+ score guarantee
$0to start then $127/mo
  • Personalized study plan and analytics
  • Thousands of lessons and practice questions

Compare the format, schedule, and included access before enrolling. Prices and seat counts shown reflect the supplied offer details.

Mc Graw Hill Test -3 CR2

Expert replies

by FightWithGMAT » Sun Jul 25, 2010 11:05 am
what is OA and OE?
Join the discussion

by diebeatsthegmat » Mon Aug 02, 2010 6:30 am
adi_800 wrote:I too went for D...

D talks about serious public health problem. C talks about flossing but does not talk about serious health problem...
i think the answer is C and it does says about gums disease: gums bleeding. flossing makes gums bleeding....but i am not very sure since the passage states that " mouthwash is as good as flossing in preventing gums disease
give it the OA and OE, man!
Join the discussion

by reply2spg » Mon Aug 02, 2010 6:49 am
Neha,

What is the OA for this?
Sudhanshu
(have lot of things to learn from all of you)
Join the discussion

by reply2spg » Mon Aug 02, 2010 6:54 am
This is actually a court room drama, you have to be aggressive on the other party. If you try to prove your point right then there might be chances that court may favor to your opponent.

If you are aggressive then there are more chances of winning. D says that mouthwash company will say that 'advertisement will increase the number of people who take effective action against gum disease, a serious public health problem', mouthwash company launched advertisement to attract people and it knows that number of people get attracted to advertisement will be more. Then where is counter to opponent?

Therefore IMO D is not correct
adi_800 wrote:I too went for D...

D talks about serious public health problem. C talks about flossing but does not talk about serious health problem...
Sudhanshu
(have lot of things to learn from all of you)
Join the discussion

by neha.patni » Mon Aug 02, 2010 6:54 am
neha.patni wrote:A study by a group of dentists has concluded that regular use of a certain brand of mouthwash is as effective as flossing in preventing gum disease. The mouthwash company has released a television ad suggesting that people who do not like flossing can now rely solely on mouthwash and brushing to maintain good dental health. A leading manufacturer of dental floss brought a lawsuit against the mouthwash company demanding that the advertisement be discontinued on the grounds that it is misleading.

Which of the following, if true, most supports the mouthwash company's defense that its advertisement promotes greater public health?

A. Since the dental floss company is protesting the advertisement only to protect its own economic self-interest, it
cannot be seen as representing greater public health.
B. Greater public health is best served if people use both mouthwash and dental floss, a combination that has been shown
to be more effective than either method used alone.
C. Many people object to flossing because it is painful and causes their gums to bleed.
D. Since, on average, people are twice as likely to use mouthwash regularly as to floss regularly, the advertisement will increase the number of people who take effective action against gum disease, a serious public health problem.
E. Gum disease has been proven to have links with the early onset of heart disease, one of the top three threats to public health in terms of mortality.m
I am so sorry...late in posting the OA

OA D
Join the discussion

by reply2spg » Mon Aug 02, 2010 6:57 am
Thanks Neha, but I don't agree with this OA

will PM some expert.
neha.patni wrote:
neha.patni wrote:A study by a group of dentists has concluded that regular use of a certain brand of mouthwash is as effective as flossing in preventing gum disease. The mouthwash company has released a television ad suggesting that people who do not like flossing can now rely solely on mouthwash and brushing to maintain good dental health. A leading manufacturer of dental floss brought a lawsuit against the mouthwash company demanding that the advertisement be discontinued on the grounds that it is misleading.

Which of the following, if true, most supports the mouthwash company's defense that its advertisement promotes greater public health?

A. Since the dental floss company is protesting the advertisement only to protect its own economic self-interest, it
cannot be seen as representing greater public health.
B. Greater public health is best served if people use both mouthwash and dental floss, a combination that has been shown
to be more effective than either method used alone.
C. Many people object to flossing because it is painful and causes their gums to bleed.
D. Since, on average, people are twice as likely to use mouthwash regularly as to floss regularly, the advertisement will increase the number of people who take effective action against gum disease, a serious public health problem.
E. Gum disease has been proven to have links with the early onset of heart disease, one of the top three threats to public health in terms of mortality.m
I am so sorry...late in posting the OA

OA D
Sudhanshu
(have lot of things to learn from all of you)
Join the discussion

by Stacey Koprince » Thu Aug 05, 2010 9:48 am
Got your PM! Okay, let's see...

Q: strengthen the idea that ad promotes greater public health

A:
(p) dentists' study: use mouthwash = eff. as flossing
(p) MW comp has ad: don't like floss, only use MW
(p) F comp sued: misleading ad

Conclusion is not in the argument; it's in the question. A little bit of a disconnect, though. The question says "greater PUBLIC health" while the argument says they claim "good DENTAL health." Typo when transcribing? Sloppy editing by the question's author? A little scope-change they're hoping people won't catch and the problem hinges on it? Not sure. I've never seen the real test change the scope of the conclusion in this way in the question. If a leap like that is made, that leap shows up in the conclusion as part of the original person's / company's / whoever's argument.

Okay, to the answers. 1st pass: decide between "definitely no" and "maybe."
A) dental floss company. conclusion not about them. we don't care. eliminate.
B) the issue isn't between using MW alone or using both. It's about replacing F with MW. Maybe that is "greater public health" than using F alone. who knows? eliminate.
C) they may "object" but this doesn't say they don't F as a result, or that they'd be more likely to use MW than F. also, the argument is about *replacing* F with MW ("can NOW rely SOLELY on MW"), which means those people are using F, which gives evidence that at least some of the "objectors" floss anyway. no evidence that the "objectors" don't floss or don't floss as much as the general population or whatever. eliminate.
D) ah, now we're talking about people doing MW more than F. ok. it's not a slam dunk, but it's a maybe.
E) says nothing about F vs. MW. eliminate.

Look at that - only D is a maybe. Guess that's the right one!
Please note: I do not use the Private Messaging system! I will not see any PMs that you send to me!!

Stacey Koprince
GMAT Instructor
Director of Online Community
Manhattan GMAT

Contributor to Beat The GMAT!

Learn more about me
Join the discussion