BREAKING: Target Test Prep releases Brand New 2026 On Demand GMAT prep course

Redeem

Target Test Prep · GMAT

Choose how you want to prepare

Learn live with an expert or move at your own pace. Every option includes the complete TTP study system.

★★★★★5.0559 reviews
Vote for Target Test Prep, Newsweek Readers’ Choice Awards 2026
NEWSWEEK READERS’ CHOICE 2026

BIG NEWS! Target Test Prep has been nominated, and they’d love your vote!

TTP has worked incredibly hard to build the best test prep experience possible, and winning Newsweek’s 2026 Readers’ Choice Award for Best Test Prep would mean a lot to them. If TTP has helped you, they’d be incredibly grateful for your vote. You can vote once each day through September 9.

Vote for TTP
GMATLiveTeach 7 seats left
Chris Peckover
NEXT LIVE COHORT

Oct 13 to Jan 7, 2027

with Chris Peckover

Schedule
Tue, Thu · 8:00 to 10:00 PM ET
Included
40 live hours + 6 months of GMAT OnDemand
  • Live instruction and real-time questions
  • Class recordings and assigned practice
View class & enroll
Limited cohort · enrollment openTarget Test Prep
EALiveTeach 5 seats left
Logan Thompson
EXECUTIVE ASSESSMENT

Sep 6 to Dec 6, 2026

with Logan Thompson

Schedule
Sun · 9:30 AM to 12:30 PM ET
Included
40 hours of live online classes plus six months of access to the complete TTP EA OnDemand course.
  • 165+ EA Score Guarantee
  • 4,100+ Quant, Verbal, and Integrated Reasoning practice questions
  • 400+ hours of in-depth video lessons
  • 3,000+ step-by-step video solutions
View EA class & enroll
Limited cohort · enrollment openTarget Test Prep
GMATOnDemand Start anytime
SELF-PACED MASTERCLASS

Target Test Prep GMAT OnDemand

Complete access from day one. Study on your schedule.

715+ score guarantee
$0to start then $127/mo
  • Personalized study plan and analytics
  • Thousands of lessons and practice questions
Start free 5-day trial
Read 559 reviewsTarget Test Prep

Compare the format, schedule, and included access before enrolling. Prices and seat counts shown reflect the supplied offer details.

MANHATTAN SC

Expert replies
Post new topic Locked
Previous Topic Next Topic
Source: — Sentence Correction |
User avatar
Legendary Member
Posts: 1077
Joined: Mon Dec 13, 2010 1:44 amFollowed by: 33 members
Thanked: 118 times
GMAT Score:710

by bblast » Wed Jan 26, 2011 11:29 am
Reva wrote:She already woke up when the phone rang.

why is this sentence wrong .
two events in past happening at diff times..

she had already woken up when the phone rang
Cheers !!

Quant 47-Striving for 50
Verbal 34-Striving for 40

My gmat journey :
https://www.beatthegmat.com/710-bblast-s ... 90735.html
My take on the GMAT RC :
https://www.beatthegmat.com/ways-to-bbla ... 90808.html
How to prepare before your MBA:
https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=upz46D7 ... TWBZF14TKW_
Top
Join the discussion
Log in to postLogin with Googleuse password
QUOTE IN REPLY
User avatar
Junior | Next Rank: 30 Posts
Posts: 27
Joined: Thu Jan 20, 2011 2:41 am
Thanked: 2 times

by vatsalroxy » Wed Jan 26, 2011 11:31 am
Because there are 2 events here and hence it should be accompanied by the time reference differentiators ( HAD BEEN/HAD + Simple VERB-ed) . Former event should be coupled with HAD/HAD BEEN and later event (Simple -ed form of verb)

So She had been awake when the phone rang!
Top
Join the discussion
Log in to postLogin with Googleuse password
QUOTE IN REPLY
User avatar
Legendary Member
Posts: 1077
Joined: Mon Dec 13, 2010 1:44 amFollowed by: 33 members
Thanked: 118 times
GMAT Score:710

by bblast » Wed Jan 26, 2011 11:43 am
correct, i thinkk i screwd up the meaning a bit
Cheers !!

Quant 47-Striving for 50
Verbal 34-Striving for 40

My gmat journey :
https://www.beatthegmat.com/710-bblast-s ... 90735.html
My take on the GMAT RC :
https://www.beatthegmat.com/ways-to-bbla ... 90808.html
How to prepare before your MBA:
https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=upz46D7 ... TWBZF14TKW_
Top
Join the discussion
Log in to postLogin with Googleuse password
QUOTE IN REPLY
Senior | Next Rank: 100 Posts
Posts: 93
Joined: Fri Feb 19, 2010 11:52 am
Thanked: 1 times

by Reva » Wed Jan 26, 2011 12:30 pm
vatsalroxy wrote:Because there are 2 events here and hence it should be accompanied by the time reference differentiators ( HAD BEEN/HAD + Simple VERB-ed) . Former event should be coupled with HAD/HAD BEEN and later event (Simple -ed form of verb)

So She had been awake when the phone rang!
i m little confused what is the difference between your sentence and bblast sentence .
Top
Join the discussion
Log in to postLogin with Googleuse password
QUOTE IN REPLY
User avatar
Junior | Next Rank: 30 Posts
Posts: 27
Joined: Thu Jan 20, 2011 2:41 am
Thanked: 2 times

by vatsalroxy » Wed Jan 26, 2011 12:48 pm
Above sentence is grammatically incorrect ! The inference is same though. When you are depicting 2 time references. The most past one say one occurred in 1990 and one now in 2011. The 1990 should be coupled with past perfect tense and the 2011 should be with simple verb+ed form.
Top
Join the discussion
Log in to postLogin with Googleuse password
QUOTE IN REPLY
Post new topic Locked
• Page 1 of 1