Live GMAT classes with Target Test Prep start Nov 21 and Nov 22. First class free.

See classes
Target Test Prep · GMAT

Choose how you want to prepare

Learn live with an expert or move at your own pace. Every option includes the complete TTP study system.

Newsweek Readers’ Choice Awards 2026 winner: Target Test Prep, #1 Test Prep

Target Test Prep was voted #1 Best Test Prep in the 2026 Newsweek Readers’ Choice™ Awards.

★★★★★5.0563 reviews
GMATLiveTeachStarts Nov 22
Josh Braslow, Target Test Prep GMAT expert
LIVE ONLINE CLASSES

Get Ready for GMAT Test Day Faster with Live Online Classes

with Josh Braslow, 20+ years in test prep

Nov 22 · Josh Braslow
Sun · 9:30 AM to 12:30 PM ET
Included
40 hours of live online classes + 6 months of TTP OnDemand
  • Attend the first class for free
  • Every class is recorded, so you never fall behind
View classes & enroll
Limited seats availableTarget Test Prep
EALiveTeachOnDemandStart anytime
EXECUTIVE ASSESSMENT

Target Test Prep EA OnDemand

Self-paced EA prep. Study on your schedule.

EXECUTIVE ASSESSMENT

with

165+ EA score guarantee
$05-day trial no automatic billing
Schedule
Included
40 hours of live online classes plus six months of access to the complete TTP EA OnDemand course.
  • 165+ EA Score Guarantee
  • 4,100+ Quant, Verbal, and Integrated Reasoning practice questions
  • 400+ hours of in-depth video lessons
  • 3,000+ step-by-step video solutions
View EA class & enroll Start free 5-day trial
Limited cohort · enrollment openTrial includes full course accessTarget Test Prep
GMATOnDemandStart anytime
SELF-PACED MASTERCLASS

Target Test Prep GMAT OnDemand

Complete access from day one. Study on your schedule.

715+ score guarantee
$0to start then $127/mo
  • Personalized study plan and analytics
  • Thousands of lessons and practice questions
Start free 5-day trial
Read 563 reviewsTarget Test Prep

Least possible problem - Tough numbers problem

Expert replies
Post new topic Post Reply
Subscribe topic
Previous Topic Next Topic
Junior | Next Rank: 30 Posts
Posts: 25
Joined: Mon Aug 25, 2008 8:47 am
by just4myself » Mon Aug 25, 2008 8:57 am
The sides of a square region measured to the nearest centimeters, are 6 centimeters long. The least possible value of the actual area of the square region is :
A) 36.00 sq. cm
B) 35.00 sq. cm
C) 33.75 sq. cm
D) 30.25 sq. cm
E) 25.00 sq. cm

Please write your explanation...

Will post the OA tomo...

Thank you
Top
Join the discussion
Source: — Problem Solving |
Legendary Member
Posts: 661
Joined: Tue Jul 08, 2008 12:58 pm
Location: France
Thanked: 48 times

by pepeprepa » Mon Aug 25, 2008 9:04 am
Well like that, I would have answered 5.6*5.6 because when we say "to the nearest " centimer, 5.5 is as close as 5 as to 6. The question is badly wrote for me and should say"rounded to the centimer" if they want us to find 5.5*5.5
But anyway you don't have 5.6*5.6
so it is 5.5*5.5=30.25
Top
Join the discussion
Legendary Member
Posts: 1153
Joined: Wed Jun 20, 2007 6:21 amFollowed by: 2 members
Thanked: 146 times

by parallel_chase » Mon Aug 25, 2008 9:05 am
Rounded to the nearest 6 cms
least possible value = 5.5

Least possible area = 5.5*5.5 =30.25

D
Last edited by parallel_chase on Mon Aug 25, 2008 9:23 am, edited 1 time in total.
Top
Join the discussion
Legendary Member
Posts: 661
Joined: Tue Jul 08, 2008 12:58 pm
Location: France
Thanked: 48 times

by pepeprepa » Mon Aug 25, 2008 9:11 am
Chase, you don't make difference between rounded to and nearest ?
I think there was a question which was based on it.
Top
Join the discussion
Junior | Next Rank: 30 Posts
Posts: 25
Joined: Mon Aug 25, 2008 8:47 am

by just4myself » Mon Aug 25, 2008 9:13 am
Yes D is the right answer...
But did u eliminate the possibility of the side being 5.9 cm, just by looking at the answer choices?
Top
Join the discussion
Legendary Member
Posts: 1153
Joined: Wed Jun 20, 2007 6:21 amFollowed by: 2 members
Thanked: 146 times

by parallel_chase » Mon Aug 25, 2008 9:15 am
pepeprepa you are absolutely right i meant rounded to 6cm
least possible value =5.5 cms

I didnt looked at 5.9

I calculated 5.6 first, then realized 5.5 can also be rounded to 6.
Top
Join the discussion
Legendary Member
Posts: 661
Joined: Tue Jul 08, 2008 12:58 pm
Location: France
Thanked: 48 times

by pepeprepa » Mon Aug 25, 2008 9:22 am
But do you think the question is wrong?
Top
Join the discussion

GMAT/MBA Expert

User avatar
GMAT Instructor
Posts: 2623
Joined: Mon Jun 02, 2008 3:17 amFollowed by: 355 members
Location: Montreal
Thanked: 1090 times
GMAT Score:780

by Ian Stewart » Mon Aug 25, 2008 11:52 am
pepeprepa wrote:But do you think the question is wrong?
There is nothing wrong with the question, as written. When you write this:
pepeprepa wrote: Well like that, I would have answered 5.6*5.6 because when we say "to the nearest " centimer, 5.5 is as close as 5 as to 6.
you are correct that 5.5 is as close to 5 as it is to 6. Still, even if you do not accept that 5.5 should round off to 6, the length of a side can be as close to 5.5 as you like; there is no reason to assume we have one decimal point precision here. The length of each side could be

5.500000000000000000000000001

for example.
Top
Join the discussion
Legendary Member
Posts: 661
Joined: Tue Jul 08, 2008 12:58 pm
Location: France
Thanked: 48 times

by pepeprepa » Mon Aug 25, 2008 1:34 pm
The point I noticed from the following https://www.beatthegmat.com/x-and-y-t15125.html

Am I wrong on this difference between closest/rounded ?
closest integer of x+y is 4
3.5<x+y<4.5
x+y rounded to the unit gives 4
3.5 <= x+y <= 4.5

I understand the least possible value can be "5.500000000000000000000000001", very close to 5, but I don't understand the result question gives the feeling it is exactly 5.5 and not an approximation...
Top
Join the discussion