BREAKING: Target Test Prep releases Brand New 2026 On Demand GMAT prep course

Redeem

Target Test Prep · GMAT

Choose how you want to prepare

Learn live with an expert or move at your own pace. Every option includes the complete TTP study system.

★★★★★5.0559 reviews
Vote for Target Test Prep, Newsweek Readers’ Choice Awards 2026
NEWSWEEK READERS’ CHOICE 2026

BIG NEWS! Target Test Prep has been nominated, and they’d love your vote!

TTP has worked incredibly hard to build the best test prep experience possible, and winning Newsweek’s 2026 Readers’ Choice Award for Best Test Prep would mean a lot to them. If TTP has helped you, they’d be incredibly grateful for your vote. You can vote once each day through September 9.

Vote for TTP
GMATLiveTeach 7 seats left
Chris Peckover
NEXT LIVE COHORT

Oct 13 to Jan 7, 2027

with Chris Peckover

Schedule
Tue, Thu · 8:00 to 10:00 PM ET
Included
40 live hours + 6 months of GMAT OnDemand
  • Live instruction and real-time questions
  • Class recordings and assigned practice
View class & enroll
Limited cohort · enrollment openTarget Test Prep
EALiveTeach 5 seats left
Logan Thompson
EXECUTIVE ASSESSMENT

Sep 6 to Dec 6, 2026

with Logan Thompson

Schedule
Sun · 9:30 AM to 12:30 PM ET
Included
40 hours of live online classes plus six months of access to the complete TTP EA OnDemand course.
  • 165+ EA Score Guarantee
  • 4,100+ Quant, Verbal, and Integrated Reasoning practice questions
  • 400+ hours of in-depth video lessons
  • 3,000+ step-by-step video solutions
View EA class & enroll
Limited cohort · enrollment openTarget Test Prep
GMATOnDemand Start anytime
SELF-PACED MASTERCLASS

Target Test Prep GMAT OnDemand

Complete access from day one. Study on your schedule.

715+ score guarantee
$0to start then $127/mo
  • Personalized study plan and analytics
  • Thousands of lessons and practice questions

Compare the format, schedule, and included access before enrolling. Prices and seat counts shown reflect the supplied offer details.

x and y

Expert replies
Source: — Data Sufficiency |

by CITI29 » Fri Aug 01, 2008 7:41 pm
anyone?
Join the discussion

by Vignesh.4384 » Fri Aug 01, 2008 11:20 pm
is the answer C ?
Join the discussion

Re: x and y

by egybs » Sat Aug 02, 2008 2:58 am
CITI29 wrote:The numbers x and y are not integers. The value of x is closest to which integer?

1) 4 is the integer that is closer to x+y.
2) 1 is the integer that is closer to x-y
Answer is E.

It should be fairly obvious why neither of these individually would work. But what about together? Let's assume that we weren't rounding for a second and solve for x and y:
x-y = 1
x+y =4
2x =5 (add two previous equations together)
x = 2.5
y = 1.5

So x is just straddling the line here (more on this in a sec)... we need to see if it's possible for x to be a little less than 2.5 and a little more than 2.5. Sure enough it can be. For example both these scenarios work:
x = 2.4, y= 1.5 so: x+y = 3.9 and x-y = .9
or
x = 2.6, y = 1.4 so: x+ y = 4 and x-y = 1.2

Since both of these scenarios work, the answer is E.

There's also another problem with the question. It doesn't tell us how to treat a number like 2.5... It's equally close to both 2 and 3. We aren't told to round, where the definition would require us to change 2.5 to 3... So we don't know what to do with it. In any case, I doubt this is a real gmat question...
Join the discussion

by pepeprepa » Sat Aug 02, 2008 3:10 am
Either 2 or 3
Agree with E
Join the discussion

by pepeprepa » Sat Aug 02, 2008 4:47 am
Closer is different from rounded.
In my view, x+y and x-y cannot have a tenth digit which is 5
3,5 is not closer to 3 than to 4, so I eliminated the 0.5

I wrote these inequalities,
3,5<x+y<4,5
0,5<x-y<1,5

I summed the two inequalities.
4<2x<6
2<x<3

So x can be closer either to 2 or to 3


I would like to know if it is permitted to add 2 inequalities like that, I try to find maths principles about that, but I have nothing.
Well, I think
A<B<C
D<E<F

A+D<B+E<C+F only if we know everything is positive
Join the discussion

by Ian Stewart » Sat Aug 02, 2008 6:31 am
pepeprepa wrote: I would like to know if it is permitted to add 2 inequalities like that, I try to find maths principles about that, but I have nothing.
Well, I think
A<B<C
D<E<F

A+D<B+E<C+F only if we know everything is positive
While you should definitely be very careful about adding inequalities, you can certainly do it. What you've done above is correct, except for the part I've highlighted in red- what you've done is true even if some of the numbers are negative. In brief, if you know:

a > b
c > d

Then a+c > b+d. Just be sure your inequalities are going in the same direction before you try to do this (i.e., be sure both are '>' or '<'). While this should probably make intuitive sense if you think about what we're doing here, there are many ways to see why it is permissible to combine inequalities in this way- you could take a formal approach:

if a > b, this just means that a = b + x, where x is positive.
if c > d, then c = d + y, where y is positive.

Then a + c = b + d + x + y, and since x+y is positive, a+c must be larger than b+d. And it doesn't matter if a, b, c and d are positive or negative.

I said above that you should be very careful when doing this, and you should only do what you know is allowed. You cannot, for example, subtract inequalities- you can only add them as above, when the inequalities are in the same direction. You can see why subtraction leads to inconsistent answers:

3 > 1
3 > 0

and if you thought you could subtract here, you'd conclude that 0 > 1, which is clearly nonsense. I'd also warn against trying to combine inequalities in more exotic ways- e.g. by multiplying them- unless you really know what you're doing. In some circumstances you can do such things, but in many situations you cannot.
For online GMAT math tutoring, or to buy my higher-level Quant books and problem sets, contact me at ianstewartgmat at gmail.com

ianstewartgmat.com
Join the discussion

by pepeprepa » Sat Aug 02, 2008 8:58 am
Thank you for the explanation!
Join the discussion