BREAKING: Target Test Prep releases Brand New 2026 On Demand GMAT prep course

Redeem

Target Test Prep · GMAT

Choose how you want to prepare

Learn live with an expert or move at your own pace. Every option includes the complete TTP study system.

★★★★★5.0559 reviews
Vote for Target Test Prep, Newsweek Readers’ Choice Awards 2026
NEWSWEEK READERS’ CHOICE 2026

BIG NEWS! Target Test Prep has been nominated, and they’d love your vote!

TTP has worked incredibly hard to build the best test prep experience possible, and winning Newsweek’s 2026 Readers’ Choice Award for Best Test Prep would mean a lot to them. If TTP has helped you, they’d be incredibly grateful for your vote. You can vote once each day through September 9.

Vote for TTP
GMATLiveTeach 7 seats left
Chris Peckover
NEXT LIVE COHORT

Oct 13 to Jan 7, 2027

with Chris Peckover

Schedule
Tue, Thu · 8:00 to 10:00 PM ET
Included
40 live hours + 6 months of GMAT OnDemand
  • Live instruction and real-time questions
  • Class recordings and assigned practice
View class & enroll
Limited cohort · enrollment openTarget Test Prep
EALiveTeach 5 seats left
Logan Thompson
EXECUTIVE ASSESSMENT

Sep 6 to Dec 6, 2026

with Logan Thompson

Schedule
Sun · 9:30 AM to 12:30 PM ET
Included
40 hours of live online classes plus six months of access to the complete TTP EA OnDemand course.
  • 165+ EA Score Guarantee
  • 4,100+ Quant, Verbal, and Integrated Reasoning practice questions
  • 400+ hours of in-depth video lessons
  • 3,000+ step-by-step video solutions
View EA class & enroll
Limited cohort · enrollment openTarget Test Prep
GMATOnDemand Start anytime
SELF-PACED MASTERCLASS

Target Test Prep GMAT OnDemand

Complete access from day one. Study on your schedule.

715+ score guarantee
$0to start then $127/mo
  • Personalized study plan and analytics
  • Thousands of lessons and practice questions

Compare the format, schedule, and included access before enrolling. Prices and seat counts shown reflect the supplied offer details.

How can we consider Spawned and Extending as parallel?

Expert replies
by chaitanya.mehrotra » Mon May 23, 2011 5:28 am
Scientists have recently discovered what could be the largest and oldest living organism on Earth, a giant fungus that is an interwoven filigree of mushrooms and rootlike tentacles spawned by a single fertilized spore some 10,000 years ago and extending for more than30 acres in the soil of a Michigan forest.

(A) extending
(B) extends
(C) extended
(D) it extended
(E) is extending

Doubt: How can Extending and Spawned be considered parallel? In some explanations Extending is said to be Present participle and Spawned to be Past Participle. Thus in my view these cannot be parallel. Can someone please clarify
Join the discussion
Source: — Sentence Correction |

by Ashley@VeritasPrep » Mon May 23, 2011 6:20 am
Hi Chaitanya,

That's a good question, because you're right that "spawned" is a past participle whereas "extending" is a present participle. However, the important thing is that participial phrases (and for that matter, prepositional phrases, too) frequently function as adjectives or adverbs. Here's a shorter example:

The woman with a hat on her head ran --> The hatted woman ran... "hatted" is a past participle functioning as an adjective describing the woman; we know it's an adjective because it can easily be replaced with a different adjective, like "pretty."

The woman ran while shouting a warning --> The woman ran shouting ... "shouting" is a present participle functioning as an adverb modifying "ran"; we know it's an adverb because it can easily be replaced with a different adverb, like "carefully."

In your sentence,
mushrooms and rootlike tentacles spawned by a single fertilized spore some 10,000 years ago and extending for more than30 acres
both "spawned..." and "extending..." are functioning as adjectives describing the mushrooms and tentacles, so we can say they're parallel. I think on this question, the only other answer that might be tempting is (C) -- "extended" -- because it looks more parallel to "spawned," but in fact, we must rule it out because of its inability to function as an adjective describing the mushrooms and tentacles.

The thing with parallelism is that it's only medium-picky. It's more like someone who says two things are alike because they're both fruits than someone who says these things are different because one is an orange and one is a banana. As long as you've got two things functioning as adjectives, you'll satisfy the demands of parallelism, even if their more specific functions are slightly different.

Hope that helps!
Ashley Newman-Owens
GMAT Instructor
Veritas Prep

Post helpful? Mosey your cursor on over to that Thank button and click, please! I will bake you an imaginary cake.
Join the discussion

• Page 1 of 1