BREAKING: Target Test Prep releases Brand New 2026 On Demand GMAT prep course

Redeem

Target Test Prep · GMAT

Choose how you want to prepare

Learn live with an expert or move at your own pace. Every option includes the complete TTP study system.

★★★★★5.0559 reviews
Vote for Target Test Prep, Newsweek Readers’ Choice Awards 2026
NEWSWEEK READERS’ CHOICE 2026

BIG NEWS! Target Test Prep has been nominated, and they’d love your vote!

TTP has worked incredibly hard to build the best test prep experience possible, and winning Newsweek’s 2026 Readers’ Choice Award for Best Test Prep would mean a lot to them. If TTP has helped you, they’d be incredibly grateful for your vote. You can vote once each day through September 9.

Vote for TTP
GMATLiveTeach 7 seats left
Chris Peckover
NEXT LIVE COHORT

Oct 13 to Jan 7, 2027

with Chris Peckover

Schedule
Tue, Thu · 8:00 to 10:00 PM ET
Included
40 live hours + 6 months of GMAT OnDemand
  • Live instruction and real-time questions
  • Class recordings and assigned practice
View class & enroll
Limited cohort · enrollment openTarget Test Prep
EALiveTeach 5 seats left
Logan Thompson
EXECUTIVE ASSESSMENT

Sep 6 to Dec 6, 2026

with Logan Thompson

Schedule
Sun · 9:30 AM to 12:30 PM ET
Included
40 hours of live online classes plus six months of access to the complete TTP EA OnDemand course.
  • 165+ EA Score Guarantee
  • 4,100+ Quant, Verbal, and Integrated Reasoning practice questions
  • 400+ hours of in-depth video lessons
  • 3,000+ step-by-step video solutions
View EA class & enroll
Limited cohort · enrollment openTarget Test Prep
GMATOnDemand Start anytime
SELF-PACED MASTERCLASS

Target Test Prep GMAT OnDemand

Complete access from day one. Study on your schedule.

715+ score guarantee
$0to start then $127/mo
  • Personalized study plan and analytics
  • Thousands of lessons and practice questions

Compare the format, schedule, and included access before enrolling. Prices and seat counts shown reflect the supplied offer details.

GMATPrep : Many people suffer an allergic reaction to

Expert replies
by BlindVision » Mon Aug 22, 2011 1:01 pm
This GMATPrep stimulus is almost identical to another GMATPrep stimulus about sulfites and wine. The latter is an assumption question, this one is a weaken question...

Many people suffer an allergic reaction to sulfites, including those that are commonly added to wine as preservatives. However, since there are several winemakers producing wine to which no sulfites are added, those who would like to drink wine but are allergic to sulfites can drink these wines without risking an allergic reaction to sulfites.

Which of the following, if true, weakens the argument?

A) Sulfites occur naturally in most wine.

B) The sulfites that can produce an allergic reaction are also commonly found in beverages other than wine.

C) Wines without added sulfites tend to be at least moderately expensive.

D) Apart from sulfites, there are other substances commonly present in wine that can trigger allergic reactions.

E) Wine without added sulfites sometimes becomes undrinkable even before the wine is sold to consumers.

OA to follow...
Life is a Test
Join the discussion
Source: — Critical Reasoning |

by crick » Mon Aug 22, 2011 6:06 pm
I will go with A here.

The Conclusion is sulfite prone people can drink wine in which no additional sulphite is added..

A destroys this Conclusion by mentioning that suplhites are naturally present in wine.

Crick
Join the discussion

by garima99 » Mon Aug 22, 2011 7:32 pm
BlindVision wrote:This GMATPrep stimulus is almost identical to another GMATPrep stimulus about sulfites and wine. The latter is an assumption question, this one is a weaken question...

Many people suffer an allergic reaction to sulfites, including those that are commonly added to wine as preservatives. However, since there are several winemakers producing wine to which no sulfites are added, those who would like to drink wine but are allergic to sulfites can drink these wines without risking an allergic reaction to sulfites. This is conclusion

Which of the following, if true, weakens the argument?

A) Sulfites occur naturally in most wine.

B) The sulfites that can produce an allergic reaction are also commonly found in beverages other than wine.

C) Wines without added sulfites tend to be at least moderately expensive.

D) Apart from sulfites, there are other substances commonly present in wine that can trigger allergic reactions.

E) Wine without added sulfites sometimes becomes undrinkable even before the wine is sold to consumers.

OA to follow...
Join the discussion

by bblast » Tue Aug 23, 2011 1:34 am
I love the way Garima uses colors to express her views in posts. :)

All right, since 2 people have already justified the correct answer, I'll talk about option D.

The conclusion of the argument is ----> those who would like to drink wine but are allergic to sulfites can drink these wines without risking an allergic reaction to sulfites.

Which of the following, if true, weakens the argument?

A) Sulfites occur naturally in most wine.->suggests alternate cause for stated effect

D) Apart from sulfites, there are other substances commonly present in wine that can trigger allergic reactions.


D is a super trap answer that talks about allergic reactions that are caused by other substances in general and not specific to the one's caused by sulfites in wine.
Cheers !!

Quant 47-Striving for 50
Verbal 34-Striving for 40

My gmat journey :
https://www.beatthegmat.com/710-bblast-s ... 90735.html
My take on the GMAT RC :
https://www.beatthegmat.com/ways-to-bbla ... 90808.html
How to prepare before your MBA:
https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=upz46D7 ... TWBZF14TKW_
Join the discussion

by killer1387 » Tue Aug 23, 2011 1:58 am
hi all,

here B,C,D can be easily removed and in option A and E use of some, most blah blah helps further truncation.Hence IMO A, but just to add,

In option A, if most is changed to some "i.e. Sulfites occur naturally in some wine" and in option E, if sometimes is removed "i.e Wine without added sulfites becomes undrinkable even before the wine is sold to consumers", then E would become the sole contender.
Join the discussion

by czarczar » Tue Aug 23, 2011 9:15 am
BlindVision wrote:This GMATPrep stimulus is almost identical to another GMATPrep stimulus about sulfites and wine. The latter is an assumption question, this one is a weaken question...

Many people suffer an allergic reaction to sulfites, including those that are commonly added to wine as preservatives. However, since there are several winemakers producing wine to which no sulfites are added, those who would like to drink wine but are allergic to sulfites can drink these wines without risking an allergic reaction to sulfites.Which of the following, if true, weakens the argument?

A) Sulfites occur naturally in most wine.

B) The sulfites that can produce an allergic reaction are also commonly found in beverages other than wine.

C) Wines without added sulfites tend to be at least moderately expensive.

D) Apart from sulfites, there are other substances commonly present in wine that can trigger allergic reactions. (We are taking about people who are allergic to sulfites ,so it's out of scope)

E) Wine without added sulfites sometimes becomes undrinkable even before the wine is sold to consumers.

OA to follow...
A only.
Join the discussion

by force5 » Tue Aug 23, 2011 11:49 am
+1 for A.
Join the discussion

by BlindVision » Wed Aug 24, 2011 8:18 pm
OA = A

[spoiler]Good job, everyone!!![/spoiler]
Life is a Test
Join the discussion

by navami » Thu Aug 25, 2011 4:55 am
A :)
This time no looking back!!!
Navami
Join the discussion