BREAKING: Target Test Prep releases Brand New 2026 On Demand GMAT prep course

Redeem

Target Test Prep · GMAT

Choose how you want to prepare

Learn live with an expert or move at your own pace. Every option includes the complete TTP study system.

★★★★★5.0559 reviews
GMATLiveTeach 7 seats left
Chris Peckover
NEXT LIVE COHORT

Oct 13 to Jan 7, 2027

with Chris Peckover

Schedule
Tue, Thu · 8:00 to 10:00 PM ET
Included
40 live hours + 6 months of GMAT OnDemand
  • Live instruction and real-time questions
  • Class recordings and assigned practice
View class & enroll
Limited cohort · enrollment openTarget Test Prep
EALiveTeach 5 seats left
Logan Thompson
EXECUTIVE ASSESSMENT

Sep 6 to Dec 6, 2026

with Logan Thompson

Schedule
Sun · 9:30 AM to 12:30 PM ET
Included
Live EA class + 6 months of EA OnDemand
  • Expert-led weekly online sessions
  • EA Masterclass access between classes
View EA class & enroll
Limited cohort · enrollment openTarget Test Prep
GMATOnDemand Start anytime
SELF-PACED MASTERCLASS

Target Test Prep GMAT OnDemand

Complete access from day one. Study on your schedule.

130-point score guarantee
$0to start then $127/mo
  • Personalized study plan and analytics
  • Thousands of lessons and practice questions

Compare the format, schedule, and included access before enrolling. Prices and seat counts shown reflect the supplied offer details.

CR - Destroying the conclusion

Expert replies
by Vishnu88 » Thu Feb 03, 2011 11:13 am
Hi,

Based on what I've read from the CR Bible text, the Weaken type questions on the GMAT almost never have answer choices that will in entirety destroy the conclusion made. The correct answer choice is one that will impact/affect the conclusion.

However, I have not had a chance to see what exactly a answer choice that will destroy the conclusion itself resembles.

Have any of you encountered such a case? If so, please share the question and the answer choices. Will help understand better.

Cheers,

Vishnu
Join the discussion
Source: — Reading Comprehension |

by prachich1987 » Thu Feb 03, 2011 11:20 am
You have posted the question under wrong section.
Post the question under CRITICAL REASONING section
Thanks!
Prachi
Join the discussion