BREAKING: Target Test Prep releases Brand New 2026 On Demand GMAT prep course

Redeem

Target Test Prep · GMAT

Choose how you want to prepare

Learn live with an expert or move at your own pace. Every option includes the complete TTP study system.

★★★★★5.0559 reviews
GMATLiveTeach Starts Oct 17
Chris Peckover, Target Test Prep GMAT expert
LIVE ONLINE CLASSES

Get Ready for GMAT Test Day Faster with Live Online Classes

with Chris Peckover, 100th-Percentile GMAT Scorer

Oct 17 · Chris Peckover
Sat · 11:00 AM to 2:00 PM ET
Oct 20 · Chris Peckover
Tue, Thu · 8:00 to 10:00 PM ET
Oct 25 · Josh Braslow
Sun · 1:00 to 4:00 PM ET
Included
40 hours of live online classes + 6 months of TTP OnDemand
  • Attend the first class for free
  • Every class is recorded, so you never fall behind
View classes & enroll
Limited seats availableTarget Test Prep
EALiveTeachOnDemand 5 seats left Start anytime
EXECUTIVE ASSESSMENT

Target Test Prep EA OnDemand

Self-paced EA prep. Study on your schedule.

Logan Thompson
EXECUTIVE ASSESSMENT

Sep 6 to Dec 6, 2026

with Logan Thompson

165+ EA score guarantee
$05-day trial no automatic billing
Schedule
Sun · 9:30 AM to 12:30 PM ET
Included
40 hours of live online classes plus six months of access to the complete TTP EA OnDemand course.
  • 165+ EA Score Guarantee
  • 4,100+ Quant, Verbal, and Integrated Reasoning practice questions
  • 400+ hours of in-depth video lessons
  • 3,000+ step-by-step video solutions
View EA class & enroll Start free 5-day trial
Limited cohort · enrollment openTrial includes full course accessTarget Test Prep
GMATOnDemand Start anytime
SELF-PACED MASTERCLASS

Target Test Prep GMAT OnDemand

Complete access from day one. Study on your schedule.

715+ score guarantee
$0to start then $127/mo
  • Personalized study plan and analytics
  • Thousands of lessons and practice questions

Compare the format, schedule, and included access before enrolling. Prices and seat counts shown reflect the supplied offer details.

circle

Expert replies
by rupsk » Tue Aug 30, 2011 6:44 am
C is a circle with center D and radius 2. E is a circle with center F and radius R. Are there any point on both E and C?

(1) distance from D to F is 1+R
(2) R=3

I know st 1 & 2 alone is not sufficient. But together how they are please explain me that
Join the discussion
Source: — Data Sufficiency |

by navami » Tue Aug 30, 2011 11:32 pm
IMO : A
As the distance between two centers is lesser than the sum of the radius. That means the circles would overlap.
This time no looking back!!!
Navami
Join the discussion

by saketk » Wed Aug 31, 2011 1:46 pm
rupsk wrote:C is a circle with center D and radius 2. E is a circle with center F and radius R. Are there any point on both E and C?

(1) distance from D to F is 1+R
(2) R=3

I know st 1 & 2 alone is not sufficient. But together how they are please explain me that
Hi -- I think Statement 1 itself is SUFFICIENT to answer this question.

Even if the two circles touch each other, the distance between their centers comes out to be 2+R
But, it is given that the distance is 1+R.. Clearly, the two circles must be overlapping to make this case possible.

What is the OA. Please do put the OE as well.
Join the discussion

by rupsk » Wed Aug 31, 2011 1:50 pm
thanks but in exam it is given C as correct answer though i had picked a as an ans.
Join the discussion

by saketk » Wed Aug 31, 2011 2:26 pm
Which exam? Then I think I am missing something. Can you copy paste the explanation given in that exam?
Or, the best thing to do is to ping an expert here. They know the best.
Join the discussion

by SticklorForDetails » Wed Aug 31, 2011 9:34 pm
If R is very small, Circle E could fit entirely inside of Circle C, such that they wouldn't intersect. Try R=0.0001 and you'll see this is easy to do. Circle E is centered just over half-way between D and the circumference of Circle C, but it's this tiny little dot. Tricky, eh? But it's a possibility that makes Statement (1) Insufficient.

If we know that R=3, then obviously Circle E can't fit inside Circle C, the distance between the radii is 4 but the sum of the radii is 5, so they must intersect, as everyone else here has already logically concluded.

Neat question! Never neglect the extreme examples; sometimes really weird things happen if you think of really tiny (or really huge) numbers on unusual DS question stems.
Experienced tutors, customized study plans, personalized service.

www.GothamTutors.com/adam.html
Join the discussion

by saketk » Wed Aug 31, 2011 9:55 pm
yeah :) ..tricky little DS

Thanks Adam, I am at fault -- i did not consider the case when one circle is inside the other... silly mistake..!
Join the discussion

by AbhiJ » Thu Sep 01, 2011 1:47 am
As adam pointed out,we can have a case when circle E is inside C.

The distance between two circles is 1+R. So 1+2R < 2.

So if R < 0.5 we can have a case when circles don't intersect.
Join the discussion

by prateek_guy2004 » Thu Sep 01, 2011 2:48 am
Statement 1 and 2 not sufficient ..

Hence c because we can conclude that r is 4
Don't look for the incorrect things that you have done rather look for remedies....

https://www.beatthegmat.com/motivation-t90253.html
Join the discussion