BREAKING: Target Test Prep releases Brand New 2026 On Demand GMAT prep course

Redeem

Target Test Prep · GMAT

Choose how you want to prepare

Learn live with an expert or move at your own pace. Every option includes the complete TTP study system.

★★★★★5.0559 reviews
Vote for Target Test Prep, Newsweek Readers’ Choice Awards 2026
NEWSWEEK READERS’ CHOICE 2026

BIG NEWS! Target Test Prep has been nominated, and they’d love your vote!

TTP has worked incredibly hard to build the best test prep experience possible, and winning Newsweek’s 2026 Readers’ Choice Award for Best Test Prep would mean a lot to them. If TTP has helped you, they’d be incredibly grateful for your vote. You can vote once each day through September 9.

Vote for TTP
GMATLiveTeach 7 seats left
Chris Peckover
NEXT LIVE COHORT

Oct 13 to Jan 7, 2027

with Chris Peckover

Schedule
Tue, Thu · 8:00 to 10:00 PM ET
Included
40 live hours + 6 months of GMAT OnDemand
  • Live instruction and real-time questions
  • Class recordings and assigned practice
View class & enroll
Limited cohort · enrollment openTarget Test Prep
EALiveTeach 5 seats left
Logan Thompson
EXECUTIVE ASSESSMENT

Sep 6 to Dec 6, 2026

with Logan Thompson

Schedule
Sun · 9:30 AM to 12:30 PM ET
Included
40 hours of live online classes plus six months of access to the complete TTP EA OnDemand course.
  • 165+ EA Score Guarantee
  • 4,100+ Quant, Verbal, and Integrated Reasoning practice questions
  • 400+ hours of in-depth video lessons
  • 3,000+ step-by-step video solutions
View EA class & enroll
Limited cohort · enrollment openTarget Test Prep
GMATOnDemand Start anytime
SELF-PACED MASTERCLASS

Target Test Prep GMAT OnDemand

Complete access from day one. Study on your schedule.

715+ score guarantee
$0to start then $127/mo
  • Personalized study plan and analytics
  • Thousands of lessons and practice questions

Compare the format, schedule, and included access before enrolling. Prices and seat counts shown reflect the supplied offer details.

carpet market

Expert replies
by paes » Wed Jun 30, 2010 5:41 pm
There is relatively little room for growth in the overall carpet market, which is tied to the size of the population. Most who purchase carpet do so only once or twice, first in their twenties or thirties, and then perhaps again in their fifties or sixties. Thus as the population ages, companies producing carpet will be able to gain market share in the carpet market only through purchasing competitors, and not through more aggressive marketing.

Which one of the following, if true, casts the most doubt on the conclusion above?

(A) Most of the major carpet producers market other floor coverings as well.
(B) Most established carpet producers market several different brand names and varieties, and there is no re-maining niche in the market for new brands to fill.
(C) Two of the three mergers in the industry's last ten years led to a decline in profits and revenues for the newly merged companies.
(D) Price reductions, achieved by cost-cutting in production, by some of the dominant firms in the carpet market are causing other producers to leave the market altogether.
(E) The carpet market is unlike most markets in that consumers are becoming increasingly resistant to new pat-terns and styles.

Please explain your reasoning
Last edited by paes on Sat Jul 03, 2010 5:33 pm, edited 1 time in total.
Join the discussion
Source: — Critical Reasoning |

by sk818020 » Wed Jun 30, 2010 7:10 pm
What is the source of this question? The answer is D by very questionable reasoning. I am going to guess and say this is a CR 1000 question. Could you please let us know?

Thanks,

Jared
Join the discussion

by paes » Wed Jun 30, 2010 8:41 pm
Source : LSAT tests

OA is D

Can somebody explain why A is wrong and D is right ?
Join the discussion

by kvcpk » Wed Jun 30, 2010 9:55 pm
paes wrote:Source : LSAT tests

OA is D

Can somebody explain why A is wrong and D is right ?
Interesting question.. Will wait for the responses..

My first thought was A too..
Join the discussion

by dream700 » Wed Jun 30, 2010 11:54 pm
for me it was always D...

A is introducing a new term "floor coverings" which has nothing to do with the given stem...

we have to weaken the conclusion that "companies producing carpet will be able to gain market share competitors, and not through more aggressive marketing"

only D does that...all other options are out of scope...

regards,
Deutsch750
Join the discussion

by paes » Thu Jul 01, 2010 8:14 am
dream700 wrote:for me it was always D...

A is introducing a new term "floor coverings" which has nothing to do with the given stem...

we have to weaken the conclusion that "companies producing carpet will be able to gain market share competitors, and not through more aggressive marketing"

only D does that...all other options are out of scope...

regards,
Deutsch750
For a weaken question, outside information is welcome.
Join the discussion

by loveusonu » Thu Jul 01, 2010 8:47 am
paes wrote:Source : LSAT tests

OA is D

Can somebody explain why A is wrong and D is right ?
Conclusion: carpet producing companies will be able to gain market share competitors as the population ages, and not through more aggressive marketing strategy.

For X and not Y is can cause...questions, options which says X is possible or Y is impossible are only correct options for supporting and Vice Versa for Weakning.

D over here:

Price Reduction or Cost-cutting(X), which is also a Agressive Marketing Strategy, has caused some effect on other companies. Hence we can say Agrresive Marketing strategy works and carpet producing companies don't have to wait for population ages to gain market share.

For A: Though major carpet Producers market other floor coverings, but here the conclusion is whether market share can be gained by Population Ages only and not by agressive marketing.

In short the conclusion is about Method of achiving, not possible to achive by other way or not. Hence A is INCORRECT.

Hope that heps!!
Sonu
--------
When you want something desperately, the whole Universe conspires in helping to give it to you - The Alchemist
Join the discussion

by 786 » Thu Jul 01, 2010 9:32 am
Hi Sonu ,

you said :
Price Reduction or Cost-cutting(X), which is also a Agressive Marketing Strategy .
Does the argument say this ? Can we assume this ?
Join the discussion

by loveusonu » Thu Jul 01, 2010 10:34 am
786 wrote:Hi Sonu ,

you said :
Price Reduction or Cost-cutting(X), which is also a Agressive Marketing Strategy .
Does the argument say this ? Can we assume this ?
Certainly, we have too. There is no other option focusing on Method to gain market share for which conclusion is based.
Sonu
--------
When you want something desperately, the whole Universe conspires in helping to give it to you - The Alchemist
Join the discussion

by hardik.jadeja » Sat Jul 03, 2010 4:04 am
paes wrote:There is relatively little room for growth in the overall carpet market, which is tied to the size of the population. Most who purchase carpet do so only once or twice, first in their fifties or sixties. Thus as the population ages, companies producing carpet will be able to gain market share competitors, and not through more aggressive marketing.

Which one of the following, if true, casts the most doubt on the conclusion above?

(A) Most of the major carpet producers market other floor coverings as well.
(B) Most established carpet producers market several different brand names and varieties, and there is no re-maining niche in the market for new brands to fill.
(C) Two of the three mergers in the industry's last ten years led to a decline in profits and revenues for the newly merged companies.
(D) Price reductions, achieved by cost-cutting in production, by some of the dominant firms in the carpet market are causing other producers to leave the market altogether.
(E) The carpet market is unlike most markets in that consumers are becoming increasingly resistant to new pat-terns and styles.

Please explain your reasoning
Thus as the population ages, companies producing carpet will be able to gain market share in the carpet market only through purchasing competitors, and not through more aggressive marketing.

When I was reading the passage, the last sentence sounded really awkward to me. When I searched for this CR, I found that some part of the last sentence(highlighted above in bold) is missing in your post.

Refer this link. It has a good explanation: https://www.beatthegmat.com/weaken-the-a ... 47501.html

Hope that helps..
Join the discussion

by paes » Sat Jul 03, 2010 5:36 pm
Thanks Jadeja. I modified the question.
Join the discussion