BREAKING: Target Test Prep releases Brand New 2026 On Demand GMAT prep course

Redeem

Target Test Prep · GMAT

Choose how you want to prepare

Learn live with an expert or move at your own pace. Every option includes the complete TTP study system.

★★★★★5.0559 reviews
Vote for Target Test Prep, Newsweek Readers’ Choice Awards 2026
NEWSWEEK READERS’ CHOICE 2026

BIG NEWS! Target Test Prep has been nominated, and they’d love your vote!

TTP has worked incredibly hard to build the best test prep experience possible, and winning Newsweek’s 2026 Readers’ Choice Award for Best Test Prep would mean a lot to them. If TTP has helped you, they’d be incredibly grateful for your vote. You can vote once each day through September 9.

Vote for TTP
GMATLiveTeach 7 seats left
Chris Peckover
NEXT LIVE COHORT

Oct 13 to Jan 7, 2027

with Chris Peckover

Schedule
Tue, Thu · 8:00 to 10:00 PM ET
Included
40 live hours + 6 months of GMAT OnDemand
  • Live instruction and real-time questions
  • Class recordings and assigned practice
View class & enroll
Limited cohort · enrollment openTarget Test Prep
EALiveTeach 5 seats left
Logan Thompson
EXECUTIVE ASSESSMENT

Sep 6 to Dec 6, 2026

with Logan Thompson

Schedule
Sun · 9:30 AM to 12:30 PM ET
Included
40 hours of live online classes plus six months of access to the complete TTP EA OnDemand course.
  • 165+ EA Score Guarantee
  • 4,100+ Quant, Verbal, and Integrated Reasoning practice questions
  • 400+ hours of in-depth video lessons
  • 3,000+ step-by-step video solutions
View EA class & enroll
Limited cohort · enrollment openTarget Test Prep
GMATOnDemand Start anytime
SELF-PACED MASTERCLASS

Target Test Prep GMAT OnDemand

Complete access from day one. Study on your schedule.

715+ score guarantee
$0to start then $127/mo
  • Personalized study plan and analytics
  • Thousands of lessons and practice questions

Compare the format, schedule, and included access before enrolling. Prices and seat counts shown reflect the supplied offer details.

Weaken the argument

Expert replies
by gmatmachoman » Fri Oct 30, 2009 12:59 pm
There is relatively little room for growth in the
overall carpet market, which is tied to the size of the population. Most who purchase carpet do so only
once or twice, first in their twenties or thirties, and then perhaps again in their fifties or sixties. Thus as the population ages, companies producing carpet will be able to gain market share in the carpet market only through purchasing competitors, and not through more aggressive marketing.



Which one of the following, if true, casts the most
doubt on the conclusion above?


(A) Most of the major carpet producers market
other floor coverings as well.
(B) Most established carpet producers market
several different brand names and varieties,
and there is no remaining niche in the
market for new brands to fill.
(C) Two of the three mergers in the industry's last
ten years led to a decline in profits and
revenues for the newly merged companies.
(D) Price reductions, achieved by cost-cutting in
production, by some of the dominant firms
in the carpet market are causing other
producers to leave the market altogether.
(E) The carpet market is unlike most markets in
that consumers are becoming increasingly
resistant to new patterns and styles

OA will be posted soon!!
Join the discussion
Source: — Critical Reasoning |

by pandeyvineet24 » Fri Oct 30, 2009 1:06 pm
D for me as it says that Price reduction is an alternate way to increase the market share.
Join the discussion

by mehravikas » Fri Oct 30, 2009 1:08 pm
I think it should be 'D'

The argument says that companies will be able to gain market share only by purchasing other companies not by aggressive marketing.

'D' - Because of cost cutting other companies are leaving the market. This means there will be bigger market share to capture for the companies that remain in the market.
Join the discussion

by Testluv » Fri Oct 30, 2009 1:41 pm
pandeyvineet24 and mehravikas: fantastic reasoning!

The conclusion is: "as the population ages, companies producing carpet will be able to gain market share in the carpet market only through purchasing competitors, and not through more aggressive marketing".

This conclusion is a prediction. Whenever the author advances a prediction, one necessary assumption he makes is: whatever must happen for the prediction to come to pass will happen. And notice how extreme the conclusion is: the ONLY way they can gain market share is through purchase of competitors.

So, the author is assuming there are no other ways market share can be gained (this is what must happen in order for the prediction to happen; if there are other ways they can gain market share, then the prediction will not necessarily happen).

In a weaken questoin, we find a choice that attacks the assumption...that is what choice D is doing.
Kaplan Teacher in Toronto
Join the discussion

by mehravikas » Fri Oct 30, 2009 1:49 pm
Thanks :lol:
Testluv wrote:pandeyvineet24 and mehravikas: fantastic reasoning!

The conclusion is: "as the population ages, companies producing carpet will be able to gain market share in the carpet market only through purchasing competitors, and not through more aggressive marketing".

This conclusion is a prediction. Whenever the author advances a prediction, one necessary assumption he makes is: whatever must happen for the prediction to come to pass will happen. And notice how extreme the conclusion is: the ONLY way they can gain market share is through purchase of competitors.

So, the author is assuming there are no other ways market share can be gained (this is what must happen in order for the prediction to happen; if there are other ways they can gain market share, then the prediction will not necessarily happen).

In a weaken questoin, we find a choice that attacks the assumption...that is what choice D is doing.
Join the discussion

by gmatmachoman » Fri Oct 30, 2009 11:52 pm
Needless to say Guys ..U r rocking...

OA D
Join the discussion