BREAKING: Target Test Prep releases Brand New 2026 On Demand GMAT prep course

Redeem

Target Test Prep · GMAT

Choose how you want to prepare

Learn live with an expert or move at your own pace. Every option includes the complete TTP study system.

★★★★★5.0559 reviews
Vote for Target Test Prep, Newsweek Readers’ Choice Awards 2026
NEWSWEEK READERS’ CHOICE 2026

BIG NEWS! Target Test Prep has been nominated, and they’d love your vote!

TTP has worked incredibly hard to build the best test prep experience possible, and winning Newsweek’s 2026 Readers’ Choice Award for Best Test Prep would mean a lot to them. If TTP has helped you, they’d be incredibly grateful for your vote. You can vote once each day through September 9.

Vote for TTP
GMATLiveTeach 7 seats left
Chris Peckover
NEXT LIVE COHORT

Oct 13 to Jan 7, 2027

with Chris Peckover

Schedule
Tue, Thu · 8:00 to 10:00 PM ET
Included
40 live hours + 6 months of GMAT OnDemand
  • Live instruction and real-time questions
  • Class recordings and assigned practice
View class & enroll
Limited cohort · enrollment openTarget Test Prep
EALiveTeach 5 seats left
Logan Thompson
EXECUTIVE ASSESSMENT

Sep 6 to Dec 6, 2026

with Logan Thompson

Schedule
Sun · 9:30 AM to 12:30 PM ET
Included
40 hours of live online classes plus six months of access to the complete TTP EA OnDemand course.
  • 165+ EA Score Guarantee
  • 4,100+ Quant, Verbal, and Integrated Reasoning practice questions
  • 400+ hours of in-depth video lessons
  • 3,000+ step-by-step video solutions
View EA class & enroll
Limited cohort · enrollment openTarget Test Prep
GMATOnDemand Start anytime
SELF-PACED MASTERCLASS

Target Test Prep GMAT OnDemand

Complete access from day one. Study on your schedule.

715+ score guarantee
$0to start then $127/mo
  • Personalized study plan and analytics
  • Thousands of lessons and practice questions

Compare the format, schedule, and included access before enrolling. Prices and seat counts shown reflect the supplied offer details.

Attention Deficit Disorder

Expert replies
by sivaelectric » Sun May 29, 2011 12:15 pm
Psychological Studies have found that children who are afflicted with Attention Deficit Disorder (ADD) are difficult to teach, inattentive, and unable to sit still for very long.
  • A. that children who are afflicted with Attention Deficit Disorder (ADD) are difficult to teach, inattentive
    B. that children who are afflicted with Attention Deficit Disorder (ADD) are difficult to teach, inattentive, and are
    C. children who are afflicted with Attention Deficit Disorder (ADD) are difficult to teach, inattentive, and they are
    D. children who are afflicted with Attention Deficit Disorder (ADD) are difficult to teach, and inattentive, and they are
    E. that children who are afflicted with Attention Deficit Disorder (ADD) are difficult to teach, they are inattentive, and are
If I am wrong correct me :), If my post helped let me know by clicking the Thanks button ;).

Chitra Sivasankar Arunagiri
Join the discussion
Source: — Sentence Correction |

by sameerballani » Sun May 29, 2011 12:35 pm
IMO A

OA and source please

Thanks.
Join the discussion

by sivaelectric » Sun May 29, 2011 8:29 pm
OA A
Source - Veritas Prep
If I am wrong correct me :), If my post helped let me know by clicking the Thanks button ;).

Chitra Sivasankar Arunagiri
Join the discussion

by Ashley@VeritasPrep » Sun May 29, 2011 8:46 pm
Hey there,
Psychological Studies have found that children who are afflicted with Attention Deficit Disorder (ADD) are difficult to teach, inattentive, and unable to sit still for very long.


A. that children who are afflicted with Attention Deficit Disorder (ADD) are difficult to teach, inattentive
B. that children who are afflicted with Attention Deficit Disorder (ADD) are difficult to teach, inattentive, and are
C. children who are afflicted with Attention Deficit Disorder (ADD) are difficult to teach, inattentive, and they are
D. children who are afflicted with Attention Deficit Disorder (ADD) are difficult to teach, and inattentive, and they are
E. that children who are afflicted with Attention Deficit Disorder (ADD) are difficult to teach, they are inattentive, and are
The first thing I'd look at here is the split between the beginnings of the answer choices. (A), (B), and (E) begin with "that children," whereas (C) and (D) simply start in with "children." Here's why we can eliminate (C) and (D) based on that distinction:

Our setup is the verb "found," and what do you find, always? Nouns. You find nouns. For instance, you find your other shoe or you find a secret passageway. The verb "found" is transitive (with the rather obscure exception of its trial-related intransitive meaning -- "We find for the defendant," e.g.) and as such, always waits for an object to come follow it. "Children ... are difficult to teach," taken alone, is a complete independent clause, i.e. an entire sentence of fact, not a noun. But by inserting the conjunction "that" before it, we create instead a noun phrase ("that children ... are difficult to teach"). And as a noun phrase -- a thing that can be found -- it delivers what "found" is waiting for. [Note: this discussion applies to many, many verbs other than "found." Whenever you have a setup that's a verb that requires an object, you need to make sure in a similar fashion that what you're following it with can function as an object. So, for example, I'd need the "that"s in all of these phrases; none of them would stand up otherwise: "We discovered that he was lying," "She liked that he always did the dishes," "I've learned that you are an Olympian," "I hate that you're always late."]

So, we're down to A, B, and E.

At this point we look at the differences in the ends of the answer choices. (A) is faithful to rules of parallelism -- "difficult," "inattentive," and "unable" are all adjectives. (B) does not behave so well:
difficult to teach, inattentive, and are unable
That "are" before "unable" messes up the parallelism. (E) is likewise messy:
difficult to teach, they are inattentive, and are unable
While we might be able to make a (shaky) argument for the presence of the "are" here, since at least it's consistent in this option, we have no grounds on which to justify the presence of the "they." That "they" messes up the parallelism.

So this question tests two good grammar issues, and also accommodates nicely the "look for splits at the beginning -- rule out two; look for splits at the end -- rule out two more" strategy!

Cheers,
Ashley Newman-Owens
GMAT Instructor
Veritas Prep

Post helpful? Mosey your cursor on over to that Thank button and click, please! I will bake you an imaginary cake.
Join the discussion

by sivaelectric » Sun May 29, 2011 9:01 pm
Hey Ashley, That explanation was better than your iTouch app. Ask your team to explain more in details like what you have done. Would be helpful :)
If I am wrong correct me :), If my post helped let me know by clicking the Thanks button ;).

Chitra Sivasankar Arunagiri
Join the discussion

• Page 1 of 1