BREAKING: Target Test Prep releases Brand New 2026 On Demand GMAT prep course

Redeem

Target Test Prep · GMAT

Choose how you want to prepare

Learn live with an expert or move at your own pace. Every option includes the complete TTP study system.

★★★★★5.0559 reviews
Vote for Target Test Prep, Newsweek Readers’ Choice Awards 2026
NEWSWEEK READERS’ CHOICE 2026

BIG NEWS! Target Test Prep has been nominated, and they’d love your vote!

TTP has worked incredibly hard to build the best test prep experience possible, and winning Newsweek’s 2026 Readers’ Choice Award for Best Test Prep would mean a lot to them. If TTP has helped you, they’d be incredibly grateful for your vote. You can vote once each day through September 9.

Vote for TTP
GMATLiveTeach 7 seats left
Chris Peckover
NEXT LIVE COHORT

Oct 13 to Jan 7, 2027

with Chris Peckover

Schedule
Tue, Thu · 8:00 to 10:00 PM ET
Included
40 live hours + 6 months of GMAT OnDemand
  • Live instruction and real-time questions
  • Class recordings and assigned practice
View class & enroll
Limited cohort · enrollment openTarget Test Prep
EALiveTeach 5 seats left
Logan Thompson
EXECUTIVE ASSESSMENT

Sep 6 to Dec 6, 2026

with Logan Thompson

Schedule
Sun · 9:30 AM to 12:30 PM ET
Included
40 hours of live online classes plus six months of access to the complete TTP EA OnDemand course.
  • 165+ EA Score Guarantee
  • 4,100+ Quant, Verbal, and Integrated Reasoning practice questions
  • 400+ hours of in-depth video lessons
  • 3,000+ step-by-step video solutions
View EA class & enroll
Limited cohort · enrollment openTarget Test Prep
GMATOnDemand Start anytime
SELF-PACED MASTERCLASS

Target Test Prep GMAT OnDemand

Complete access from day one. Study on your schedule.

715+ score guarantee
$0to start then $127/mo
  • Personalized study plan and analytics
  • Thousands of lessons and practice questions

Compare the format, schedule, and included access before enrolling. Prices and seat counts shown reflect the supplied offer details.

As sources of electrical power, windmills

Expert replies
by aspirant2011 » Sat May 28, 2011 10:42 am
As sources of electrical power, windmills now account for only about 2,500 megawatts nationwide, but production is almost expected to double by the end of the year, which would provide enough electricity for 1.3 million households.

A. almost expected to double by the end of the year, which would provide
B. almost expected that it will double by the end of the year, thus providing
C. expected that it will almost double by the end of the year to provide
D. expected almost to double by the end of the year and thus to provide
E. expected almost to double by the end of the year, which would thus be providing

[spoiler]OA: Will be posted later. Please discuss each answer choice in detail[/spoiler]
Join the discussion
Source: — Sentence Correction |

by maihuna » Sat May 28, 2011 10:54 am
almost expected is meaningless, and so is which referring back to year. So ABE out. I am not to happy choosing either of C or D, but split infinitive in D suggest me to go for C.
Charged up again to beat the beast :)
Join the discussion

by cans » Sat May 28, 2011 11:28 am
IMO D
Join the discussion

by clock60 » Sat May 28, 2011 11:29 am
vote for D
Join the discussion

by aspirant2011 » Sat May 28, 2011 11:35 am
I am not able to understand " thus to provide " part in option D :-(....please explain on this
Join the discussion

by maitraab » Sat May 28, 2011 11:36 am
I feel D is the correct answer...
Join the discussion

by clock60 » Sat May 28, 2011 11:42 am
i hope that in D we deal with ||-ism issue
to double..and thus to provide
Join the discussion

by niksworth » Sat May 28, 2011 9:13 pm
Bad question in my opinion. A,B,E are clearly out for reasons provided by maihuna.

Option C
production is expected that something will happen - Weird construction. Doesn't make any sense.

Option D
clock60 wrote:i hope that in D we deal with ||-ism issue
to double..and thus to provide
In D, the parallel elements are -
Production is expected almost
- to double by the end of the year
and thus
- to provide enough electricity for 1.3 million households.

Now frankly, production is expected to provide sounds crazy to me.

The use of almost is so strange in four choices. Ideally, it should limit double, in the sense that production is expected to almost double. Only choice C has that. However, the construction of C is weird, as outlined above.
scio me nihil scire
Join the discussion

by sameerballani » Sun May 29, 2011 3:16 am
aspirant2011 wrote:As sources of electrical power, windmills now account for only about 2,500 megawatts nationwide, but production is almost expected to double by the end of the year, which would provide enough electricity for 1.3 million households.

A. almost expected to double by the end of the year, which would provide
B. almost expected that it will double by the end of the year, thus providing
C. expected that it will almost double by the end of the year to provide
D. expected almost to double by the end of the year and thus to provide
E. expected almost to double by the end of the year, which would thus be providing

[spoiler]OA: Will be posted later. Please discuss each answer choice in detail[/spoiler]
IMO D

It seems to be an issue of parallelism.

Also, the usage expected that it will almost double seems to be awkward. Although the usage of expected that is tempting BUT the usage of IT creates a confusion

Production is expected that IT double by....
OR
Production is expected to double by...

Which one seems better?
Join the discussion

by aspirant2011 » Sun May 29, 2011 8:34 am
OA given is D :-(........I am confused with the usage of "thus to provide" because though the same maintains parallelism but meaning of the sentence is not clear.........
Join the discussion

by sameerballani » Sun May 29, 2011 8:38 am
aspirant2011 wrote:OA given is D :-(........I am confused with the usage of "thus to provide" because though the same maintains parallelism but meaning of the sentence is not clear.........
Why so? Doesn't it follow the Chronological Sequence.
NOW Windmil acct ONLY 2.5k MW -> BUT prod is expctd 2 dbl -> and thus 2 provide enuf elec...
Join the discussion

by cans » Sun May 29, 2011 10:22 pm
As sources of electrical power, windmills now account for only about 2,500 megawatts nationwide, but production is expected almost to double by the end of the year and thus to provide enough electricity for 1.3 million households.
Expected to double and thus expected to provide enough.........
Join the discussion

by aspirant2011 » Mon May 30, 2011 8:13 am
sameerballani wrote:
aspirant2011 wrote:As sources of electrical power, windmills now account for only about 2,500 megawatts nationwide, but production is almost expected to double by the end of the year, which would provide enough electricity for 1.3 million households.

A. almost expected to double by the end of the year, which would provide
B. almost expected that it will double by the end of the year, thus providing
C. expected that it will almost double by the end of the year to provide
D. expected almost to double by the end of the year and thus to provide
E. expected almost to double by the end of the year, which would thus be providing

[spoiler]OA: Will be posted later. Please discuss each answer choice in detail[/spoiler]
IMO D

It seems to be an issue of parallelism.

Also, the usage expected that it will almost double seems to be awkward. Although the usage of expected that is tempting BUT the usage of IT creates a confusion

Production is expected that IT double by....
OR
Production is expected to double by...

Which one seems better?
Hi Sameer,

in option C whats wrong with "it"???????? isn't this "it" refering to production
Join the discussion

by sameerballani » Mon May 30, 2011 9:19 am
aspirant2011 wrote:
sameerballani wrote:
aspirant2011 wrote:As sources of electrical power, windmills now account for only about 2,500 megawatts nationwide, but production is almost expected to double by the end of the year, which would provide enough electricity for 1.3 million households.

A. almost expected to double by the end of the year, which would provide
B. almost expected that it will double by the end of the year, thus providing
C. expected that it will almost double by the end of the year to provide
D. expected almost to double by the end of the year and thus to provide
E. expected almost to double by the end of the year, which would thus be providing

[spoiler]OA: Will be posted later. Please discuss each answer choice in detail[/spoiler]
IMO D

It seems to be an issue of parallelism.

Also, the usage expected that it will almost double seems to be awkward. Although the usage of expected that is tempting BUT the usage of IT creates a confusion

Production is expected that IT double by....
OR
Production is expected to double by...

Which one seems better?
Hi Sameer,

in option C whats wrong with "it"???????? isn't this "it" refering to production
Hi,
It is trying to refer to production only but the point is that its not required and it results in awkwardness.

Just Listen how it sounds-
production is expected that it will almost double by the end of the year to provide
Also, I m not able to recall wat it is exactly, BUT there is some rule that when restating a subject in a relative clause, don't mention it as IT. Something like this..

More concise form could be: It is expected that production will... or Production is expected to double

I hope this helps

Thanks
Join the discussion

by Jim@Grockit » Mon May 30, 2011 10:35 pm
niksworth wrote:Bad question in my opinion. A,B,E are clearly out for reasons provided by maihuna.


Now frankly, production is expected to provide sounds crazy to me.

The use of almost is so strange in four choices. Ideally, it should limit double, in the sense that production is expected to almost double. Only choice C has that. However, the construction of C is weird, as outlined above.
There's nothing wrong per se with "is expected to provide" (The class is expected to provide its own pencils for the exam), but yes, "almost" is wrong in four choices and right in a choice that's wrong for other reasons.
Join the discussion