BREAKING: Target Test Prep releases Brand New 2026 On Demand GMAT prep course

Redeem

Target Test Prep · GMAT

Choose how you want to prepare

Learn live with an expert or move at your own pace. Every option includes the complete TTP study system.

★★★★★5.0559 reviews
Vote for Target Test Prep, Newsweek Readers’ Choice Awards 2026
NEWSWEEK READERS’ CHOICE 2026

BIG NEWS! Target Test Prep has been nominated, and they’d love your vote!

TTP has worked incredibly hard to build the best test prep experience possible, and winning Newsweek’s 2026 Readers’ Choice Award for Best Test Prep would mean a lot to them. If TTP has helped you, they’d be incredibly grateful for your vote. You can vote once each day through September 9.

Vote for TTP
GMATLiveTeach 7 seats left
Chris Peckover
NEXT LIVE COHORT

Oct 13 to Jan 7, 2027

with Chris Peckover

Schedule
Tue, Thu · 8:00 to 10:00 PM ET
Included
40 live hours + 6 months of GMAT OnDemand
  • Live instruction and real-time questions
  • Class recordings and assigned practice
View class & enroll
Limited cohort · enrollment openTarget Test Prep
EALiveTeach 5 seats left
Logan Thompson
EXECUTIVE ASSESSMENT

Sep 6 to Dec 6, 2026

with Logan Thompson

Schedule
Sun · 9:30 AM to 12:30 PM ET
Included
Live EA class + 6 months of EA OnDemand
  • Expert-led weekly online sessions
  • EA Masterclass access between classes
View EA class & enroll
Limited cohort · enrollment openTarget Test Prep
GMATOnDemand Start anytime
SELF-PACED MASTERCLASS

Target Test Prep GMAT OnDemand

Complete access from day one. Study on your schedule.

715+ score guarantee
$0to start then $127/mo
  • Personalized study plan and analytics
  • Thousands of lessons and practice questions

Compare the format, schedule, and included access before enrolling. Prices and seat counts shown reflect the supplied offer details.

After arduous months of fighting........

Expert replies
by pzazz12 » Mon Oct 25, 2010 4:10 am
After arduous months of fighting, the sight of the white flag being raised generated as much relief on the victor's side than it did on the vanquished.

A. as much relief on the victor's side than it did on the vanquished.
B. as much relief among the victors as among the vanquished.
C. as much relief on the victor's side as it did on the vanquished's.
D. relief both on the victor's side as well as on the vanquished's.
E. relief both for the victor and the vanquished side.
Join the discussion
Source: — Sentence Correction |

by ramannjit » Mon Oct 25, 2010 4:22 am
Will go with B: as much X as X
Ramannjit
Join the discussion

by GMATMadeEasy » Tue Oct 26, 2010 8:01 am
I'd say C. If it is B, can someone explain please why?
Join the discussion

by ramannjit » Tue Oct 26, 2010 8:18 am
GMATMadeEasy wrote:I'd say C. If it is B, can someone explain please why?
A: As much.... than, wrong usage.

D: both .. as well as, wrong usage.

C: Vanquished's: wrong usage

E: No parallelism. Meaning altered

So B is coorect: as much relief among the victors as among the vanquished. Correct idiom usage
Ramannjit
Join the discussion

by kapur.arnav » Tue Oct 26, 2010 8:44 am
pzazz12 wrote:After arduous months of fighting, the sight of the white flag being raised generated as much relief on the victor's side than it did on the vanquished.
My 2 cents...

A. as much relief on the victor's side than it did on the vanquished - as much x than y... wrong... we say as much x as y... than is used if we use more... more x than y

B. as much relief among the victors as among the vanquished - correct usage

C. as much relief on the victor's side as it did on the vanquished's - vanquished's - wrong usage... it needs to explicitly say vanquished side

D. relief both on the victor's side as well as on the vanquished's - usage of both and as well as is redundant and not required...

E. relief both for the victor and the vanquished side - lacks parallelism... victor side and the vanquished side..
Join the discussion

by GMATMadeEasy » Wed Oct 27, 2010 7:00 am
C: Vanquished's: wrong usage
in my opinion, it is correct usge ?
Join the discussion

by DarkKnight » Wed Oct 27, 2010 1:53 pm
Whats the OA?
Join the discussion

by gmatrix » Wed Oct 27, 2010 8:26 pm
my pick B
Life is all about ass; you're either covering it, laughing it off, kicking it, kissing it, busting it, trying to get a piece of it, or behaving like one.
Join the discussion

by pradeepkaushal9518 » Wed Oct 27, 2010 8:44 pm
ya as much X as Y should be correct.

B
A SMALL TOWN GUY
Join the discussion

by Jen@VeritasPrep » Fri Oct 29, 2010 7:49 am
Good discussion on this one! You're right that the correct comparison idioms are as....as or both....and. This lets you eliminate A and D. In E, the comparison isn't logical -- it's comparing a victor (a person) to a vanquished side.

In answer choice C, "vanquished's" is a bit awkward -- it would be preferable to use the more straightforward adjective structure "vanquished side," which would be parallel with something like "victorious side." But the logical difference between B and C can help you here as well. It makes more sense for PEOPLE to feel relief than for sides to feel relief. This meaning is much clearer in B -- relief among the victors and vanquished. Clarity of meaning is VERY important on SC questions -- sentences must be grammatically AND logically correct.
Jen Rugani
GMAT Instructor, Veritas Prep
www.veritasprep.com
Join the discussion

by GMATMadeEasy » Fri Oct 29, 2010 9:33 am
But the logical difference between B and C can help you here as well. It makes more sense for PEOPLE to feel relief than for sides to feel relief.
Thank you very much for your explanation on this. But this is cruel of GMAT if they test meaning up to that extent. It is hard to distinguish the line between real word usage and puristy grammar approach . To my ears both sound cporrect :(((
Join the discussion

by shweta.kalra » Fri Oct 29, 2010 10:33 am
thanks For the explanation JEN
PLZ CLARIFY WHAT DOES "IT" REFERS TO IN "C" OR S T AMBIGUOUS?
THANKS
Join the discussion

by Jen@VeritasPrep » Fri Oct 29, 2010 10:38 am
The antecedent of "it" in choice C is "the sight" -- this is the only logical antecedent here, so the pronoun use is fine. There can be multiple potential grammatical antecedents for a pronoun, but if only one is logical then the usage is correct. But C still has the other issues that I mentioned above.
Jen Rugani
GMAT Instructor, Veritas Prep
www.veritasprep.com
Join the discussion

by LalaB » Sun Sep 25, 2011 9:25 pm
+1 for C
Join the discussion

by GmatKiss » Mon Sep 26, 2011 6:04 am
clear B
Join the discussion