BREAKING: Target Test Prep releases Brand New 2026 On Demand GMAT prep course

Redeem

Target Test Prep · GMAT

Choose how you want to prepare

Learn live with an expert or move at your own pace. Every option includes the complete TTP study system.

★★★★★5.0563 reviews
Newsweek Readers’ Choice Awards 2026 winner: Target Test Prep, #1 Test Prep
NEWSWEEK READERS’ CHOICE AWARDS 2026

Target Test Prep was voted #1 Best Test Prep in the 2026 Newsweek Readers’ Choice™ Awards.

GMATLiveTeach Starts Oct 17
Chris Peckover, Target Test Prep GMAT expert
LIVE ONLINE CLASSES

Get Ready for GMAT Test Day Faster with Live Online Classes

with Chris Peckover, 100th-Percentile GMAT Scorer

Oct 17 · Chris Peckover
Sat · 11:00 AM to 2:00 PM ET
Oct 20 · Chris Peckover
Tue, Thu · 8:00 to 10:00 PM ET
Oct 25 · Josh Braslow
Sun · 1:00 to 4:00 PM ET
Included
40 hours of live online classes + 6 months of TTP OnDemand
  • Attend the first class for free
  • Every class is recorded, so you never fall behind
View classes & enroll
Limited seats availableTarget Test Prep
EALiveTeachOnDemand 5 seats left Start anytime
EXECUTIVE ASSESSMENT

Target Test Prep EA OnDemand

Self-paced EA prep. Study on your schedule.

Logan Thompson
EXECUTIVE ASSESSMENT

Sep 6 to Dec 6, 2026

with Logan Thompson

165+ EA score guarantee
$05-day trial no automatic billing
Schedule
Sun · 9:30 AM to 12:30 PM ET
Included
40 hours of live online classes plus six months of access to the complete TTP EA OnDemand course.
  • 165+ EA Score Guarantee
  • 4,100+ Quant, Verbal, and Integrated Reasoning practice questions
  • 400+ hours of in-depth video lessons
  • 3,000+ step-by-step video solutions
View EA class & enroll Start free 5-day trial
Limited cohort · enrollment openTrial includes full course accessTarget Test Prep
GMATOnDemand Start anytime
SELF-PACED MASTERCLASS

Target Test Prep GMAT OnDemand

Complete access from day one. Study on your schedule.

715+ score guarantee
$0to start then $127/mo
  • Personalized study plan and analytics
  • Thousands of lessons and practice questions

Compare the format, schedule, and included access before enrolling. Prices and seat counts shown reflect the supplied offer details.

a cr from gmatclub

Expert replies
by diebeatsthegmat » Sat Jan 29, 2011 1:13 am
Scientists are discussing ways to remove excess carbon dioxide from the atmosphere by increasing the amount that is absorbed by plant life. One plan to accomplish this is to establish giant floating seaweed farms in the oceans. When the seaweed plants die, they will be disposed of by being burned for fuel.

Which of the following, if true, would indicate the most serious weakness in the plan above?
A. Some areas of ocean in the Southern Hemisphere do not contain sufficient nutrients to support large seaweed farms.
B. When a seaweed plant is burned, it releases an amount of carbon dioxide comparable to the amount it has absorbed in its lifetime.
C. Even if seaweed farms prove effective, some people will be reluctant to switch to this new fuel.
D. Each year about seven billion tons of carbon dioxide are released into the atmosphere but only about five billion tons are absorbed by plant life.
E. Seaweed farms would make more money by farming seaweed to sell as nutritional supplements than by farming seaweed to sell as fuel

[spoiler]why E? for me, E is out of scope... the problem about if farm makes more money by farming seaweed is not mentioned and cared in the text.....
B is my answer[/spoiler]
Join the discussion
Source: — Critical Reasoning |

by maihuna » Sat Jan 29, 2011 2:26 am
I think B is OK, as it says that C02 absorbed and releSED is same so this plan will not be able to resuce co2, at most same.
Charged up again to beat the beast :)
Join the discussion

by prachich1987 » Sat Jan 29, 2011 2:34 am
The main goal of the scientists is to reduce the carbon dioxide and not to make profit from seaweed.
The answer has to be B.
Join the discussion

by vatsalroxy » Sat Jan 29, 2011 4:05 am
As clearly the argument flows like

1) Sc: ways to remove excessive CO2 frm atmosp
2) How? : Incrs the amt of Co2 that is absorbed by plant life.
3)Concl : Incrs Seaweed farm in ocean.

Catch is the language of the argument where most assume that increasing plants => red Co2 .
But as per the arg.

"remove excess carbon dioxide from the atmosphere by increasing the amount that is absorbed by plant life"

so B is out of scope here.

The one that stands is D cz thats the only choice which attacks the premise that plants are already saturated to the core of absorbing co2 of whatever form. And thus the conclusion will fail coz nothing else matters !


Hence as per me it should be D
Join the discussion

by prachich1987 » Sat Jan 29, 2011 4:13 am
vatsalroxy wrote:As clearly the argument flows like

1) Sc: ways to remove excessive CO2 frm atmosp
2) How? : Incrs the amt of Co2 that is absorbed by plant life.
3)Concl : Incrs Seaweed farm in ocean.

Catch is the language of the argument where most assume that increasing plants => red Co2 .
But as per the arg.

"remove excess carbon dioxide from the atmosphere by increasing the amount that is absorbed by plant life"

so B is out of scope here.

The one that stands is D cz thats the only choice which attacks the premise that plants are already saturated to the core of absorbing co2 of whatever form. And thus the conclusion will fail coz nothing else matters !


Hence as per me it should be D
Scientifically there should not be any saturation point for the amount of CO2 absorbed by plants
May be there are not enough no of plants & hence a limited amount of CO2 is absorbed
Planting seaweeds will help in decreasing CO2 at least to some extent...
Join the discussion

by prachich1987 » Sat Jan 29, 2011 4:20 am
@diebeatsthegmat : I checked on gmatclub as well as on scribd.com
The answer given is B only
From where you get E?
Join the discussion

by vatsalroxy » Sat Jan 29, 2011 4:20 am
Agree with u Prachi on scientific explanation but as far as the lang twist is there. It becomes ugly to challenge the premise on which the conclusion is based. If the question is about decrsng the C02 levels by increasing the trees absorbing them .then its fine..
Ans should be B . But if the question says that increasing the kind of Co2 tat the plants can absorb really makes us think about the sources of Co2 wich the plants will absorb.

Hope you getting my point here?
Join the discussion

by diebeatsthegmat » Mon Jan 31, 2011 1:19 am
prachich1987 wrote:@diebeatsthegmat : I checked on gmatclub as well as on scribd.com
The answer given is B only
From where you get E?
i read the question and saw the answer choice in gmatclub forum and its E and i was suprised... if its B its better and fine for me :)
thanks
Join the discussion