Contrary to the scholarly wisdom of the 1950's and early 1960's that predicted the processes of modernization and rationalization would gradually undermine it, ethnicity is a worldwide phenomenon of increasing importance.
(A) would gradually undermine it
(B) to be a gradual undermining of it
(C) would be a gradual undermining of ethnicity
(D) to gradually undermine ethnicity
(E) gradually undermining it
Kindly post your answer with an explanation...OA after some discussion
1000 Series 962 Question
This topic has expert replies
- money9111
- Legendary Member
- Posts: 2109
- Joined: Sun Apr 19, 2009 10:25 pm
- Location: New Jersey
- Thanked: 109 times
- Followed by:79 members
- GMAT Score:640
IMO C because it predicted that the processes would be a gradual undermining of ethnicity...
My goal is to make MBA applicants take onus over their process.
My story from Pre-MBA to Cornell MBA - New Post in Pre-MBA blog
Me featured on Poets & Quants
Free Book for MBA Applicants
My story from Pre-MBA to Cornell MBA - New Post in Pre-MBA blog
Me featured on Poets & Quants
Free Book for MBA Applicants
- thephoenix
- Legendary Member
- Posts: 1560
- Joined: Tue Nov 17, 2009 2:38 am
- Thanked: 137 times
- Followed by:5 members
IMO Asinghag wrote:Contrary to the scholarly wisdom of the 1950's and early 1960's that predicted the processes of modernization and rationalization would gradually undermine it, ethnicity is a worldwide phenomenon of increasing importance.
(A) would gradually undermine it
(B) to be a gradual undermining of it
(C) would be a gradual undermining of ethnicity
(D) to gradually undermine ethnicity
(E) gradually undermining it
Kindly post your answer with an explanation...OA after some discussion
b) wrng idiom "predict X to be Y" is unidiomatic.
c)awkward
d)"predict X to do Y" is unidiomatic.
e) meaning altered
-
- Senior | Next Rank: 100 Posts
- Posts: 87
- Joined: Wed Jan 06, 2010 8:16 pm
- Location: Chandigarh, INDIA
+ 1 A
something is "predicted" in past => "would" is require to refer to future from past
something is "predicted" in past => "would" is require to refer to future from past
Gym/GMAT/Girl -- Be Serious
-
- Legendary Member
- Posts: 941
- Joined: Sun Dec 27, 2009 12:28 am
- Thanked: 20 times
- Followed by:1 members
Kindly help yourself clear this ambiguity picture in your mind with regards to this sentence by looking at Ron's explanation in this link
https://www.beatthegmat.com/ethnicity-t39693-15.html
Hope this helps
https://www.beatthegmat.com/ethnicity-t39693-15.html
Hope this helps
singhag wrote:Contrary to the scholarly wisdom of the 1950's and early 1960's that predicted the processes of modernization and rationalization would gradually undermine it, ethnicity is a worldwide phenomenon of increasing importance.
(A) would gradually undermine it
(B) to be a gradual undermining of it
(C) would be a gradual undermining of ethnicity
(D) to gradually undermine ethnicity
(E) gradually undermining it
Kindly post your answer with an explanation...OA after some discussion