BREAKING: Target Test Prep releases Brand New 2026 On Demand GMAT prep course

Redeem

Target Test Prep · GMAT

Choose how you want to prepare

Learn live with an expert or move at your own pace. Every option includes the complete TTP study system.

★★★★★5.0559 reviews
Vote for Target Test Prep, Newsweek Readers’ Choice Awards 2026
NEWSWEEK READERS’ CHOICE 2026

BIG NEWS! Target Test Prep has been nominated, and they’d love your vote!

TTP has worked incredibly hard to build the best test prep experience possible, and winning Newsweek’s 2026 Readers’ Choice Award for Best Test Prep would mean a lot to them. If TTP has helped you, they’d be incredibly grateful for your vote. You can vote once each day through September 9.

Vote for TTP
GMATLiveTeach 7 seats left
Chris Peckover
NEXT LIVE COHORT

Oct 13 to Jan 7, 2027

with Chris Peckover

Schedule
Tue, Thu · 8:00 to 10:00 PM ET
Included
40 live hours + 6 months of GMAT OnDemand
  • Live instruction and real-time questions
  • Class recordings and assigned practice
View class & enroll
Limited cohort · enrollment openTarget Test Prep
EALiveTeach 5 seats left
Logan Thompson
EXECUTIVE ASSESSMENT

Sep 6 to Dec 6, 2026

with Logan Thompson

Schedule
Sun · 9:30 AM to 12:30 PM ET
Included
40 hours of live online classes plus six months of access to the complete TTP EA OnDemand course.
  • 165+ EA Score Guarantee
  • 4,100+ Quant, Verbal, and Integrated Reasoning practice questions
  • 400+ hours of in-depth video lessons
  • 3,000+ step-by-step video solutions
View EA class & enroll
Limited cohort · enrollment openTarget Test Prep
GMATOnDemand Start anytime
SELF-PACED MASTERCLASS

Target Test Prep GMAT OnDemand

Complete access from day one. Study on your schedule.

715+ score guarantee
$0to start then $127/mo
  • Personalized study plan and analytics
  • Thousands of lessons and practice questions

Compare the format, schedule, and included access before enrolling. Prices and seat counts shown reflect the supplied offer details.

10-WEEK SUMMER VACATION

Expert replies
by success1111 » Wed Apr 22, 2009 7:48 pm
Hi,
i need help on this question.

During a 10-week summer vacation,was the average(arithmetic mean) number of books that Carolyn read per week greater than the average number of books that Jacob read per week?

1) Twice the average number of books that Carolyn read per week was greater than 5 less than twice the average number of books that Jacob read per week.

2) During the last 5 weeks of the vacation,Carolyn read a total of 3 books more than Jacob.
Join the discussion
Source: — Data Sufficiency |

by ncr_10 » Wed Apr 22, 2009 8:32 pm
Whats the OA ?

1. 2*C > 2*J - 5, where C and J are Carolyn's and Jacob's avg.

If C = 10 and J = 11, the eqn holds good
If C = 10 and J = 9, the eqn holds good.
So we can't decide if C > J or C < J. Insufficient.


2. What if Jacob read more books in the first 5 weeks ? So this
is again insufficient.

We can't come to a conclusion combining both the stems either. So E.
Join the discussion

by Sher1 » Wed Apr 22, 2009 8:35 pm
I think it is E

Question says

Is Ac > Aj
or Ac-Aj>0

St1

2Ac>2Aj-5
Ac-Aj>-5/2
No Suff

St 2

Info for the last 5 weeks no suff


1 & 2

Don't think they help solve the problem when combined

Whats OA
Join the discussion

by success1111 » Wed Apr 22, 2009 9:07 pm
Thanks for the inputs.However,i need more response before i can post official answers.
DanaJ,Staurt,Steward, and other experts,please help.
Join the discussion

by lilu » Wed Apr 22, 2009 9:15 pm
success1111 wrote:Thanks for the inputs.However,i need more response before i can post official answers.
DanaJ,Staurt,Steward, and other experts,please help.
Stuart has already posted an answer to this question:
https://www.beatthegmat.com/set-24-q-12-t4975.html
The more you look, the more you see.
Join the discussion

by success1111 » Wed Apr 22, 2009 9:42 pm
lilu wrote:
success1111 wrote:Thanks for the inputs.However,i need more response before i can post official answers.
DanaJ,Staurt,Steward, and other experts,please help.
Stuart has already posted an answer to this question:
https://www.beatthegmat.com/set-24-q-12-t4975.html

Thanks.However,i dont agree that the answer is E.The OA says A.
Join the discussion

by rossmj » Thu Apr 23, 2009 7:20 am
Answer is definitely E.

We want to know if AvgC>AvgJ

Stmt 1

2AvgC>2AvgJ-5 if we divide by 2 we get
AvgC>AvgJ-2.5 we can rearrange further to get
2.5>AvgJ-AvgC or AvgC-AvgJ>-2.5 either way the difference could be positive negative or zero INSUFF.

Stmt 2

Knowing about the last 5 weeks doesn't help.

Together still nothing.

Are you positive that you wrote the question out properly. If statement 1 said something about 2AvgC>2AvgJ-5 in the first 5 weeks and statement 2 remained the same the answer would be C.
Join the discussion

by success1111 » Fri Apr 24, 2009 5:19 pm
rossmj wrote:Answer is definitely E.

We want to know if AvgC>AvgJ

Stmt 1

2AvgC>2AvgJ-5 if we divide by 2 we get
AvgC>AvgJ-2.5 we can rearrange further to get
2.5>AvgJ-AvgC or AvgC-AvgJ>-2.5 either way the difference could be positive negative or zero INSUFF.

Stmt 2

Knowing about the last 5 weeks doesn't help.

Together still nothing.

Are you positive that you wrote the question out properly. If statement 1 said something about 2AvgC>2AvgJ-5 in the first 5 weeks and statement 2 remained the same the answer would be C.

The question is correct.
The OA is A but I got E with different method but similar to yours.

Thanks everyone for your inputs.
Trust but verify.
Join the discussion

by Vemuri » Sat Apr 25, 2009 4:45 am
success1111 wrote:
The question is correct.
The OA is A but I got E with different method but similar to yours.

Thanks everyone for your inputs.
Hi success1111. What is the source of this question & do you have an OA explanation?
Join the discussion

by success1111 » Sat Apr 25, 2009 8:47 pm
Vemuri wrote:
success1111 wrote:
The question is correct.
The OA is A but I got E with different method but similar to yours.

Thanks everyone for your inputs.
Hi success1111. What is the source of this question & do you have an OA explanation?

I dont have official explanation.The question is a retired gmat question.
Trust but verify.
Join the discussion