BREAKING: Target Test Prep releases Brand New 2026 On Demand GMAT prep course

Redeem

Target Test Prep · GMAT

Choose how you want to prepare

Learn live with an expert or move at your own pace. Every option includes the complete TTP study system.

★★★★★5.0559 reviews
Vote for Target Test Prep, Newsweek Readers’ Choice Awards 2026
NEWSWEEK READERS’ CHOICE 2026

BIG NEWS! Target Test Prep has been nominated, and they’d love your vote!

TTP has worked incredibly hard to build the best test prep experience possible, and winning Newsweek’s 2026 Readers’ Choice Award for Best Test Prep would mean a lot to them. If TTP has helped you, they’d be incredibly grateful for your vote. You can vote once each day through September 9.

Vote for TTP
GMATLiveTeach 7 seats left
Chris Peckover
NEXT LIVE COHORT

Oct 13 to Jan 7, 2027

with Chris Peckover

Schedule
Tue, Thu · 8:00 to 10:00 PM ET
Included
40 live hours + 6 months of GMAT OnDemand
  • Live instruction and real-time questions
  • Class recordings and assigned practice
View class & enroll
Limited cohort · enrollment openTarget Test Prep
EALiveTeach 5 seats left
Logan Thompson
EXECUTIVE ASSESSMENT

Sep 6 to Dec 6, 2026

with Logan Thompson

Schedule
Sun · 9:30 AM to 12:30 PM ET
Included
40 hours of live online classes plus six months of access to the complete TTP EA OnDemand course.
  • 165+ EA Score Guarantee
  • 4,100+ Quant, Verbal, and Integrated Reasoning practice questions
  • 400+ hours of in-depth video lessons
  • 3,000+ step-by-step video solutions
View EA class & enroll
Limited cohort · enrollment openTarget Test Prep
GMATOnDemand Start anytime
SELF-PACED MASTERCLASS

Target Test Prep GMAT OnDemand

Complete access from day one. Study on your schedule.

715+ score guarantee
$0to start then $127/mo
  • Personalized study plan and analytics
  • Thousands of lessons and practice questions

Compare the format, schedule, and included access before enrolling. Prices and seat counts shown reflect the supplied offer details.

set 24 Q 12

Expert replies
by radhika1306 » Tue Sep 04, 2007 11:55 am
During a 10-week summer vacation, was the average (arithmetic mean) number of
books that Carolyn read per week greater than the average number of books that Jacob
read per week?
(1) Twice the average number of books that Carolyn read per week was greater
than 5 less than twice the average number of books that Jacob read per week.
(2) During the last 5 weeks of the vacation, Carolyn read a total of 3 books more
than Jacob.
Join the discussion
Source: — Data Sufficiency |

Re: set 24 Q 12

by ri2007 » Tue Sep 04, 2007 1:27 pm
radhika1306 wrote:During a 10-week summer vacation, was the average (arithmetic mean) number of
books that Carolyn read per week greater than the average number of books that Jacob
read per week?
(1) Twice the average number of books that Carolyn read per week was greater
than 5 less than twice the average number of books that Jacob read per week.
(2) During the last 5 weeks of the vacation, Carolyn read a total of 3 books more
than Jacob.
Answer should be A.

Statement 2 just does not give enough information. However if you convert the information given in statement 1 you get the following equation -

2c > 2J - 5, where c & j stand for the average no of books read by each person.

No matter what value you put for X, Y will have to be greater than X to satisfy the equation.

Is this the correct answer?
Join the discussion

by radhika1306 » Tue Sep 04, 2007 2:12 pm
Correct thanks
Join the discussion

Re: set 24 Q 12

by TT » Mon Sep 10, 2007 7:09 pm
ri2007 wrote:
radhika1306 wrote:During a 10-week summer vacation, was the average (arithmetic mean) number of
books that Carolyn read per week greater than the average number of books that Jacob
read per week?
(1) Twice the average number of books that Carolyn read per week was greater
than 5 less than twice the average number of books that Jacob read per week.
(2) During the last 5 weeks of the vacation, Carolyn read a total of 3 books more
than Jacob.
Answer should be A.

Statement 2 just does not give enough information. However if you convert the information given in statement 1 you get the following equation -

2c > 2J - 5, where c & j stand for the average no of books read by each person.

No matter what value you put for X, Y will have to be greater than X to satisfy the equation.

Is this the correct answer?

I don't understand how though.

If 2c>2J-5: if c=5, j=4, the statement holds. Is c=5 and j=6, the statement still holds.
Join the discussion

TT

You are correct, thanks for pointing out my mistake.

To be honest I was hoping some one else would read ur comment and give the correct solution:)

Am not sure if I am reading statement 1 in the right way but here is how it could be written -

5> 2C<2J?

average number of books that Carolyn read was greater
than 5 less than twice the average
number of books that Jacob read per week

So statement 1 is enough ???
Join the discussion

by magical cook » Mon Feb 18, 2008 12:20 am
Is E or A? I think it's E but could be tricy than I think..
Join the discussion

by Stuart@KaplanGMAT » Mon Feb 18, 2008 3:23 pm
It's (e), not enough information.

Statement (1) was correctly translated as:

2C > 2J - 5

As TT pointed out, we can pick numbers that make C>J and that make J>C. Therefore, statement (1) by itself isn't sufficient.

Statement (2) was simpler.. it says that in the second half of the period, Carolyn read an extra 3 books, total. We know that her average for the last half will be greater than J's, but we know nothing about the first half, so (2) is also insufficient.

When we combine the statements, we're still out of luck. We can pick the exact same numbers suggested by TT and satisfy both statements, so we can still get both a yes and a no answer: insufficient.
Image

Stuart Kovinsky | Kaplan GMAT Faculty | Toronto

Kaplan Exclusive: The Official Test Day Experience | Ready to Take a Free Practice Test? | Kaplan/Beat the GMAT Member Discount
BTG100 for $100 off a full course
Join the discussion