BREAKING: Target Test Prep releases Brand New 2026 On Demand GMAT prep course

Redeem

Target Test Prep · GMAT

Choose how you want to prepare

Learn live with an expert or move at your own pace. Every option includes the complete TTP study system.

★★★★★5.0559 reviews
Vote for Target Test Prep, Newsweek Readers’ Choice Awards 2026
NEWSWEEK READERS’ CHOICE 2026

BIG NEWS! Target Test Prep has been nominated, and they’d love your vote!

TTP has worked incredibly hard to build the best test prep experience possible, and winning Newsweek’s 2026 Readers’ Choice Award for Best Test Prep would mean a lot to them. If TTP has helped you, they’d be incredibly grateful for your vote. You can vote once each day through September 9.

Vote for TTP
GMATLiveTeach 7 seats left
Chris Peckover
NEXT LIVE COHORT

Oct 13 to Jan 7, 2027

with Chris Peckover

Schedule
Tue, Thu · 8:00 to 10:00 PM ET
Included
40 live hours + 6 months of GMAT OnDemand
  • Live instruction and real-time questions
  • Class recordings and assigned practice
View class & enroll
Limited cohort · enrollment openTarget Test Prep
EALiveTeach 5 seats left
Logan Thompson
EXECUTIVE ASSESSMENT

Sep 6 to Dec 6, 2026

with Logan Thompson

Schedule
Sun · 9:30 AM to 12:30 PM ET
Included
40 hours of live online classes plus six months of access to the complete TTP EA OnDemand course.
  • 165+ EA Score Guarantee
  • 4,100+ Quant, Verbal, and Integrated Reasoning practice questions
  • 400+ hours of in-depth video lessons
  • 3,000+ step-by-step video solutions
View EA class & enroll
Limited cohort · enrollment openTarget Test Prep
GMATOnDemand Start anytime
SELF-PACED MASTERCLASS

Target Test Prep GMAT OnDemand

Complete access from day one. Study on your schedule.

715+ score guarantee
$0to start then $127/mo
  • Personalized study plan and analytics
  • Thousands of lessons and practice questions

Compare the format, schedule, and included access before enrolling. Prices and seat counts shown reflect the supplied offer details.

ZZZ: Agreement / Disagreement (LSAT)

Expert replies
by gmatusa2010 » Sun Aug 15, 2010 1:03 am
Kim: The rapidly growing world population is increasing demands on food producers in ways that threaten our natural resources. With more land needed for both food production and urban areas, less land will be available for forests and wildlife habitats.

Hampton: You are overlooking the promise of technology. I am confident that improvements in agriculture will allow for us to feed the world population of ten billion predicted for 2050 without significantly increasing the percentage of the world's land now devoted to agriculture.

Kim's and Hampton's statements most strongly support the claim that booth of them would agree which one of the following


B) Continued research into more-efficient agricultural practices and innovative biotechnology aimed at producing more food on less land would be beneficial.

D) In the next half century, human population growth will continue to erode wildlife habitats and diminish forests.


I put D because

1) "without significantly increasing the percentage of the world's land now devoted to agriculture" Implies although not significant but some increase of land devoted to agriculture will occur.

2) "Kim's and Hampton's statements most strongly support " It said Kim's and Hampton's statements NOT Kim or Hampton. Neither one talked about biotech. Kim just talked about land and nothing about efficiency. Although I do somewhat agree that Kim and Hampton might agree on B but their statements as present do not. Furthermore its more of a stretch then D which is explicit.


Please have input.
Join the discussion
Source: — Critical Reasoning |

by reply2spg » Sun Aug 15, 2010 2:10 pm
I think B is correct
gmatusa2010 wrote:Kim: The rapidly growing world population is increasing demands on food producers in ways that threaten our natural resources. With more land needed for both food production and urban areas, less land will be available for forests and wildlife habitats.

Hampton: You are overlooking the promise of technology. I am confident that improvements in agriculture will allow for us to feed the world population of ten billion predicted for 2050 without significantly increasing the percentage of the world's land now devoted to agriculture.

Kim's and Hampton's statements most strongly support the claim that booth of them would agree which one of the following


B) Continued research into more-efficient agricultural practices and innovative biotechnology aimed at producing more food on less land would be beneficial.

D) In the next half century, human population growth will continue to erode wildlife habitats and diminish forests.


I put D because

1) "without significantly increasing the percentage of the world's land now devoted to agriculture" Implies although not significant but some increase of land devoted to agriculture will occur.

2) "Kim's and Hampton's statements most strongly support " It said Kim's and Hampton's statements NOT Kim or Hampton. Neither one talked about biotech. Kim just talked about land and nothing about efficiency. Although I do somewhat agree that Kim and Hampton might agree on B but their statements as present do not. Furthermore its more of a stretch then D which is explicit.


Please have input.
Sudhanshu
(have lot of things to learn from all of you)
Join the discussion

by rashmi.kaushal » Mon Aug 16, 2010 2:43 am
What is the OA ??

B just reiterates hampton's Views !
Join the discussion

by Prashantbhardwaj » Mon Aug 16, 2010 5:59 am
I think the answer is B.

It can be inferred from the passage that Hampton acknowledges Kim's concern for the availability of land for natural resources and wildlife. And then he suggests an effective solution.

As such B being that solution; B is what they both will agree to.
Join the discussion

by diebeatsthegmat » Sun Aug 22, 2010 8:58 am
gmatusa2010 wrote:Kim: The rapidly growing world population is increasing demands on food producers in ways that threaten our natural resources. With more land needed for both food production and urban areas, less land will be available for forests and wildlife habitats.

Hampton: You are overlooking the promise of technology. I am confident that improvements in agriculture will allow for us to feed the world population of ten billion predicted for 2050 without significantly increasing the percentage of the world's land now devoted to agriculture.

Kim's and Hampton's statements most strongly support the claim that booth of them would agree which one of the following


B) Continued research into more-efficient agricultural practices and innovative biotechnology aimed at producing more food on less land would be beneficial.

D) In the next half century, human population growth will continue to erode wildlife habitats and diminish forests.


I put D because

1) "without significantly increasing the percentage of the world's land now devoted to agriculture" Implies although not significant but some increase of land devoted to agriculture will occur.

2) "Kim's and Hampton's statements most strongly support " It said Kim's and Hampton's statements NOT Kim or Hampton. Neither one talked about biotech. Kim just talked about land and nothing about efficiency. Although I do somewhat agree that Kim and Hampton might agree on B but their statements as present do not. Furthermore its more of a stretch then D which is explicit.


Please have input.
also agree that B is the answer. D is jsut what kim mentioned but in B both agree that producing more food on more land can threaten the resource
Join the discussion